Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
201,818 studies31 sourcesUpdated 37 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BYResearch and Practice in Thrombosis and Haemostasis

Integrating pharmacovigilance and machine learning: bleeding signal detection and risk prediction for oral anticoagulants in cancer patients

  1. 1Department of Pharmacy, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, China
  2. 2Department of Pharmacy, Wuping County Hospital, Longyan, China
  3. 3Department of Interventional Radiology, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, China

Abstract

Background: Oral anticoagulants (OACs) have been widely used for the prevention and treatment of thrombosis in cancer patients, but the bleeding signals associated with different OACs in this population have not been fully studied. Objectives: This study aimed to compare bleeding signals, identify risk factors, and establish a prediction model for OACs in cancer patients. Methods: This study was based on the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System database and used the reporting odds ratio to evaluate the bleeding event signals associated with OACs in cancer patients from Q1 2014 to Q1 2024. Additionally, this study used a retrospective cohort design to assess the impact of OACs on bleeding risk in cancer patients. Results: This study analyzed 29,897 adverse event reports of OACs in cancer patients, which included 4084 bleeding events. We found that bleeding events were mainly concentrated within the first 2 months of medication use. Compared with apixaban, the other 4 OACs (warfarin, edoxaban, rivaroxaban, and dabigatran) showed increased risks of bleeding, especially in the gastrointestinal system. Male, cardiovascular diseases, cerebral infarction, renal insufficiency, gastrointestinal cancer, and elevated international normalized ratio are linked to an increased risk of bleeding from OACs in cancer patients. The XGBoost model was the top-performing model among the 4 bleeding prediction models (training set area under the curve = 0.788; test set area under the curve = 0.783). Conclusion: Bleeding adverse events related to OACs primarily occur early in the treatment. Apixaban shows weaker bleeding signals. Male sex, cardiovascular diseases, cerebral infarction, renal insufficiency, gastrointestinal cancer, and an elevated international normalized ratio may be potential risk factors for bleeding events. The prediction model for OACs-related bleeding developed in this study demonstrated acceptable performance in internal validation.

Related

  1. Hyperbolic heterogeneous graph learning for adverse drug reaction prediction, candidate prioritization, and pathway-based interpretation in pharmacovigilance
    Ru Lv, Xiaoyu Xu, Yulin Ji +3
    Frontiers in PharmacologyPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Pharmacology & toxicologyFrontiersCrossref
  2. Integrating Causal Inference into Pharmacovigilance: Target Trial Emulations for Proactive Signal Detection of Atorvastatin Initiation in Medicare Beneficiaries
    C. G. Rowan, J. Tazare, M. Tran +3
    medRxivPreprintCC BYFull textEpidemiology & public healthmedRxiv
  3. A machine learning-driven and explainable prediction model for in-hospital mortality in patients with diabetes mellitus and congestive heart failure: integrating XGBoost and SHAP approaches.
    Jingru Hu, Shiqiong Su, Dongdong Liu
    Frontiers in public healthPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textEpidemiology & public healthEurope PMCCrossref
  4. A genetic algorithm–optimized EWMA control chart integrating machine learning-based risk prediction for multistage thyroid cancer treatment monitoring
    Mohammad Rasouli, Elham Rahimi, Arshia Ilaty
    PLOS OnePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textOncologyPLOS
  5. Machine learning models integrating 2D and 3D intratumoral heterogeneity features from multi-sequence MRI: accurate prediction of perineural invasion in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma
    Zhiqiang Ouyang, Zhengrui Song, Zhilin Li +9
    Frontiers in artificial intelligencePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textMedical imaging & radiologyEurope PMCPMC
BibTeX
@article{lv2026integrating,
  title = {{Integrating pharmacovigilance and machine learning: bleeding signal detection and risk prediction for oral anticoagulants in cancer patients}},
  author = {Meina Lv and Xiaochun Zheng and Hang Xie and Bijuan Lin},
  journal = {Research and Practice in Thrombosis and Haemostasis},
  year = {2026},
  month = aug,
  doi = {10.1016/j.rpth.2026.106868},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rpth.2026.106868},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Integrating pharmacovigilance and machine learning: bleeding signal detection and risk prediction for oral anticoagulants in cancer patients
AU  - Meina Lv
AU  - Xiaochun Zheng
AU  - Hang Xie
AU  - Bijuan Lin
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/08/01
JO  - Research and Practice in Thrombosis and Haemostasis
DO  - 10.1016/j.rpth.2026.106868
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rpth.2026.106868
AB  - Background: Oral anticoagulants (OACs) have been widely used for the prevention and treatment of thrombosis in cancer patients, but the bleeding signals associated with different OACs in this population have not been fully studied. Objectives: This study aimed to compare bleeding signals, identify risk factors, and establish a prediction model for OACs in cancer patients. Methods: This study was based on the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System database and used the reporting odds ratio to evaluate the bleeding event signals associated with OACs in cancer patients from Q1 2014 to Q1 2024. Additionally, this study used a retrospective cohort design to assess the impact of OACs on bleeding risk in cancer patients. Results: This study analyzed 29,897 adverse event reports of OACs in cancer patients, which included 4084 bleeding events. We found that bleeding events were mainly concentrated within the first 2 months of medication use. Compared with apixaban, the other 4 OACs (warfarin, edoxaban, rivaroxaban, and dabigatran) showed increased risks of bleeding, especially in the gastrointestinal system. Male, cardiovascular diseases, cerebral infarction, renal insufficiency, gastrointestinal cancer, and elevated international normalized ratio are linked to an increased risk of bleeding from OACs in cancer patients. The XGBoost model was the top-performing model among the 4 bleeding prediction models (training set area under the curve = 0.788; test set area under the curve = 0.783). Conclusion: Bleeding adverse events related to OACs primarily occur early in the treatment. Apixaban shows weaker bleeding signals. Male sex, cardiovascular diseases, cerebral infarction, renal insufficiency, gastrointestinal cancer, and an elevated international normalized ratio may be potential risk factors for bleeding events. The prediction model for OACs-related bleeding developed in this study demonstrated acceptable performance in internal validation.
SN  - 2475-0379
ER  -