Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 2 min ago
PreprintCC BY 4.0arXiv

Passive Phase-Aware Hadamard Decoding: Analytical and Machine-Learning Approaches

Abstract

Hadamard-coded optical receivers typically rely on stable interference conditions, which can motivate active optical phase control. We investigate a fixed, intensity-only decoder that embeds four populated modes in an eight-mode interferometer and provides six complementary trigonometric observables through simultaneous power measurements. An analytic transition decoder uses the resulting sign-change patterns without continuous optical phase stabilization. The receiver's intensity-to-observable map is inverted exactly, and an identifiability analysis characterizes exceptional phase configurations and conditional noise sensitivity. An ideal, equal-photon-budget comparison with conventional four-port Hadamard decoding illustrates the potential value of the additional outputs without implying an unconditional advantage. Measurements on programmable photonic processors give 96.19% accuracy for the analytical decoding experiment; a complementary machine-learning analysis reports 98.31% on a held-out experimental trace. These results demonstrate an intensity-only, phase-aware approach to differential Hadamard decoding under the tested conditions, while larger codebooks and hardware-level energy benefits remain topics for future investigation.

Related

  1. Increased-Order Generalized Synchronization in Memristive Neurons: Analytical and Data-Driven Approaches
    Dennis Mustafić, Marius E. Yamakou
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textDynamical systemsStatistical & nonlinear physicsarXiv
  2. An integrated viscoelastic modeling framework combining analytical and FEM approaches: Application to WSe2 coatings
    Mohamed Bensalem, Fateh Bahadur, Yue Wang +2
    arXivPreprintCC BY-NC-SA 4.0Full textApplied physics & instrumentationarXiv
  3. Separating active irradiation from passive outcome learning in radiotherapy: a finite-model computational benchmark
    Yuntao Wang
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textBiological & medical physicsarXiv
  4. Underdamped Stochastic Optimal Transport with Landauer boundary conditions: machine learning and analytical solution
    Julia Sanders, Dario Lucente, Marco Baldovin +1
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textOptimisation & controlStatistical & nonlinear physicsarXiv
  5. Decoding complexity through machine learning is redefining scientific discovery
    Ricardo Vinuesa, Paola Cinnella, Jean Rabault +10
    Communications PhysicsPeer-reviewedCC BYFull text3 citedAtomic, molecular & optical physicsHAL
BibTeX
@misc{elmas2026passive,
  title = {{Passive Phase-Aware Hadamard Decoding: Analytical and Machine-Learning Approaches}},
  author = {Gökhan Elmas and Igor A Litvin and Janis Nötzel},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2610.29797},
  eprint = {2610.29797},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.29797},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Passive Phase-Aware Hadamard Decoding: Analytical and Machine-Learning Approaches
AU  - Gökhan Elmas
AU  - Igor A Litvin
AU  - Janis Nötzel
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/21
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2610.29797
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.29797
AB  - Hadamard-coded optical receivers typically rely on stable interference conditions, which can motivate active optical phase control. We investigate a fixed, intensity-only decoder that embeds four populated modes in an eight-mode interferometer and provides six complementary trigonometric observables through simultaneous power measurements. An analytic transition decoder uses the resulting sign-change patterns without continuous optical phase stabilization. The receiver's intensity-to-observable map is inverted exactly, and an identifiability analysis characterizes exceptional phase configurations and conditional noise sensitivity. An ideal, equal-photon-budget comparison with conventional four-port Hadamard decoding illustrates the potential value of the additional outputs without implying an unconditional advantage. Measurements on programmable photonic processors give 96.19% accuracy for the analytical decoding experiment; a complementary machine-learning analysis reports 98.31% on a held-out experimental trace. These results demonstrate an intensity-only, phase-aware approach to differential Hadamard decoding under the tested conditions, while larger codebooks and hardware-level energy benefits remain topics for future investigation.
ER  -