PreprintCC BY 4.0arXiv
Response to "Late Time Dynamical Dark Energy and the CMB-Distance Ladder Tension"
Abstract
We respond to the recent paper by Efstathiou (arXiv:2607.29562) who makes several statements that appear to be in conflict with our recent paper (Turner & Huterer, arXiv:2606.05358). We stand by our primary result that direct determinations of H0 can be sensitive to the late-time expansion history. We also point out where there is significant agreement between his work and ours.
Related
- Does the inverse distance ladder rule out late-time solutions to the Hubble tension? A model-independent test using DES-Dovekie supernovae and DESI DR2 BAO
- Selection effects in correlated observations with application to distance-ladder observations
- Selection effects in correlated observations with application to distance-ladder observations
- A cosmological intercept tension in local distance ladders
- Revisiting the Hubble tension with an inverse power-law early dark energy
BibTeX
@misc{turner2026response,
title = {{Response to "Late Time Dynamical Dark Energy and the CMB-Distance Ladder Tension"}},
author = {Michael S. Turner and Dragan Huterer},
howpublished = {arXiv},
year = {2026},
month = nov,
doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2611.05199},
eprint = {2611.05199},
archivePrefix = {arXiv},
url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.05199},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - UNPB
TI - Response to "Late Time Dynamical Dark Energy and the CMB-Distance Ladder Tension"
AU - Michael S. Turner
AU - Dragan Huterer
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/11/03
PB - arXiv
DO - 10.48550/arxiv.2611.05199
UR - https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.05199
AB - We respond to the recent paper by Efstathiou (arXiv:2607.29562) who makes several statements that appear to be in conflict with our recent paper (Turner & Huterer, arXiv:2606.05358). We stand by our primary result that direct determinations of H_0 can be sensitive to the late-time expansion history. We also point out where there is significant agreement between his work and ours.
ER -