Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
223,421 studies31 sourcesUpdated 26 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0BMC Public Health

Implementation evaluation of a healthy beverage default policy in Illinois

4 affiliations
  1. 1Department of Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA USA
  2. 2Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD USA
  3. 3Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA USA
  4. 4Division of Health Policy and Administration, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, IL USA

Abstract

Background: At least 25 cities and counties and four states have implemented a healthy beverage default policy to reduce children’s intake of sweetened drinks. Compliance evaluations of these policies have shown that implementation has been incomplete and inconsistent. This study describes implementation of a 2021 Illinois policy requiring healthy beverage defaults with restaurant kids’ meals, identifies barriers and facilitators, and gathers lessons learned to improve implementation.

Methods: Data were collected from 2024 to 2025, 2–3 years after the policy implementation deadline and one year after a compliance evaluation. Data sources included policy documents (n = 50), restaurant menu board audits (n = 32), interviews with restaurant managers (n = 33), and in-depth interviews with staff from state and local health agencies, restaurant groups, industry trade associations, and public health advocacy organizations (n = 15). Descriptive statistics were calculated from survey data and qualitative data were coded using a deductive approach and thematically analyzed.

Results: Implementation facilitators included alignment with existing restaurant practices and industry initiatives, strong inter-organizational partnerships, and supply chain efficiencies at chain restaurants. Barriers included inadequate communication about the policy to restaurant staff, policy ambiguity, inadequate guidance and infrastructure for monitoring and enforcement, limited nutrition knowledge of health inspectors, and rulemaking delays. Practices to improve implementation included consulting health agencies’ offices of food protection during policy formulation, defining key terms in the statute, offering nutrition expertise to health inspectors, and providing adequate guidance and infrastructure for monitoring and enforcement.

Conclusions: Findings explain results from evaluations of similar policies and can improve future policy implementation.

Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-026-28460-4.

Related

  1. Recommendations for the development, implementation, and evaluation of technology-assisted physical activity interventions to support healthy aging: insights from PhysAgeNet
    Nadja Schott, Jana Pelclová, Eleftheria Giannouli +6
    Frontiers in digital healthPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textPhysiologyEurope PMCHAL
  2. Implementation of a workplace healthy lifestyle education intervention for metabolic syndrome risk reduction in Ethiopia: a mixed-methods process evaluation.
    Sitotaw Kerie Bogale, Haribondhu Sarma, Uday Narayan Yadav +1
    Frontiers in public healthPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textEpidemiology & public healthEurope PMCCrossref
  3. Neurodegenerative disorders: Stereotyped relationships between pathological metabolic topographies and the healthy default mode network
    Matej Perovnik, David Eidelberg
    Research SquarePreprintCC BY 4.0Full textPsychiatry & mental healthPMC
  4. Development and Evaluation of a Dietary Polysaccharide-Stabilized Peptide-Fe²⁺ Complex Beverage for Iron Deficiency Anemia Intervention.
    Yongqian Liang, Shanting Lin, Shengjun Chen +4
    Foods (Basel, Switzerland)Peer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  5. Development and evaluation of a functional beverage from red dragon peel, sweet orange, and bilimbi juices with antioxidant activity and preliminary chemoprotective potential
    S. Angel Miranda, Wahyu Haryati Maser, Elisa Julianti +2
    Discover FoodPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textNutritionDOAJ
BibTeX
@article{moran2026implementation,
  title = {{Implementation evaluation of a healthy beverage default policy in Illinois}},
  author = {Alyssa J. Moran and Angie L. Cradock and Andrea A. Pipito and Aline Vandenbroeck and Lisa M. Powell},
  journal = {BMC Public Health},
  year = {2026},
  month = aug,
  doi = {10.1186/s12889-026-28460-4},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-026-28460-4},
  note = {CC BY-NC-ND 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Implementation evaluation of a healthy beverage default policy in Illinois
AU  - Alyssa J. Moran
AU  - Angie L. Cradock
AU  - Andrea A. Pipito
AU  - Aline Vandenbroeck
AU  - Lisa M. Powell
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/08/11
JO  - BMC Public Health
DO  - 10.1186/s12889-026-28460-4
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-026-28460-4
AB  - Background: At least 25 cities and counties and four states have implemented a healthy beverage default policy to reduce children’s intake of sweetened drinks. Compliance evaluations of these policies have shown that implementation has been incomplete and inconsistent. This study describes implementation of a 2021 Illinois policy requiring healthy beverage defaults with restaurant kids’ meals, identifies barriers and facilitators, and gathers lessons learned to improve implementation.  Methods: Data were collected from 2024 to 2025, 2–3 years after the policy implementation deadline and one year after a compliance evaluation. Data sources included policy documents (n = 50), restaurant menu board audits (n = 32), interviews with restaurant managers (n = 33), and in-depth interviews with staff from state and local health agencies, restaurant groups, industry trade associations, and public health advocacy organizations (n = 15). Descriptive statistics were calculated from survey data and qualitative data were coded using a deductive approach and thematically analyzed.  Results: Implementation facilitators included alignment with existing restaurant practices and industry initiatives, strong inter-organizational partnerships, and supply chain efficiencies at chain restaurants. Barriers included inadequate communication about the policy to restaurant staff, policy ambiguity, inadequate guidance and infrastructure for monitoring and enforcement, limited nutrition knowledge of health inspectors, and rulemaking delays. Practices to improve implementation included consulting health agencies’ offices of food protection during policy formulation, defining key terms in the statute, offering nutrition expertise to health inspectors, and providing adequate guidance and infrastructure for monitoring and enforcement.  Conclusions: Findings explain results from evaluations of similar policies and can improve future policy implementation.  Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-026-28460-4.
SN  - 1471-2458
ER  -