Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
182,469 studies31 sourcesUpdated 39 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry

Longitudinal developmental profiles in 4- to 5-year-old Dutch children: a latent profile analysis

6 affiliations
  1. 1Accare Child Study Center, Groningen, The Netherlands
  2. 2University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Paediatrics, Beatrix Children’s Hospital, Division of Developmental Neurology, Groningen, The Netherlands
  3. 3The Research School of Behavioural and Cognitive Neurosciences, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
  4. 4University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Psychiatry, Groningen, The Netherlands
  5. 5Health in Context Research Institute, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
  6. 6University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Paediatric Neurology, Groningen, The Netherlands

Abstract

We aimed to gain knowledge on children’s development by distinguishing developmental profiles based on neurological and motor assessments in infancy, and motor and cognitive assessments at early school age. Profile characteristics and the associations between profiles and behavioural characteristics at early school age were also examined. Based on their neurological and motor scores at an age between 3 and 18 months, we invited 703 Dutch children of 4–5 years old (369 with atypical and 334 with typical infant neuromotor behaviour) of whom 518 (74%) participated in the current study. A latent profile analysis was performed to identify the developmental profiles. We examined profile characteristics and compared the parent-reported behavioural and emotional difficulties, ASD traits and ADHD traits at early school-age between the developmental profiles. We found four developmental profiles: ‘typical development’, ‘early advanced development’, ‘developmental catch-up’ and ‘developmental difficulties’. Being a boy was associated with the ‘developmental difficulties’ profile and being a girl and high parental educational level were associated with the ‘typical development’ profile. Children in the ‘developmental difficulties’ profile showed the most behavioural and emotional difficulties, ASD traits and ADHD traits The four profiles pointed to highly varying developmental patterns, underlining the inter- and intra-individual variability of development and showing the challenges of predicting later developmental outcome based on infancy assessments.

Related

  1. Factors Associated With Symptom Profiles Among Chinese Patients With Multiple Myeloma: A Latent Profile Analysis
    Ting Wang, Yingying Lin, Leiwen Tang +5
    Cancer medicinePeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  2. Dyadic coping and factors associated with prenatal depression and anxiety profiles: a couple-level latent profile analysis study
    Yue Sun, Ping Lei Chui, Mei Chan Chong +3
    BMC Public HealthPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Epidemiology & public healthCrossref
  3. Profiles of digital empowerment among older adults and their association with self-perception of aging: a latent profile analysis
    Lei Zhang, Longtao Wang, Weichao Chen
    BMC GeriatricsPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textGeneral medicinePMC
  4. Cognitive impairment profiles in patients with cerebrovascular diseases: a latent profile analysis
    Yao Yin, Hui Ma, Rong Zou +3
    Frontiers in NeurologyPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textPsychiatry & mental healthCrossrefEurope PMCPMC
  5. Lipid and immune profiles in children with systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis: a case-control study with paired longitudinal comparison of disease activity
    Translational pediatricsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
BibTeX
@article{rosinda2026longitudinal,
  title = {{Longitudinal developmental profiles in 4- to 5-year-old Dutch children: a latent profile analysis}},
  author = {Selena J. Rosinda and Pieter J. Hoekstra and Mijna Hadders-Algra and Kirsten R. Heineman and Annelies de Bildt},
  journal = {European Child \& Adolescent Psychiatry},
  year = {2026},
  month = jul,
  doi = {10.1007/s00787-026-03109-0},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1007/s00787-026-03109-0},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Longitudinal developmental profiles in 4- to 5-year-old Dutch children: a latent profile analysis
AU  - Selena J. Rosinda
AU  - Pieter J. Hoekstra
AU  - Mijna Hadders-Algra
AU  - Kirsten R. Heineman
AU  - Annelies de Bildt
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/07/08
JO  - European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
DO  - 10.1007/s00787-026-03109-0
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1007/s00787-026-03109-0
AB  - We aimed to gain knowledge on children’s development by distinguishing developmental profiles based on neurological and motor assessments in infancy, and motor and cognitive assessments at early school age. Profile characteristics and the associations between profiles and behavioural characteristics at early school age were also examined. Based on their neurological and motor scores at an age between 3 and 18 months, we invited 703 Dutch children of 4–5 years old (369 with atypical and 334 with typical infant neuromotor behaviour) of whom 518 (74%) participated in the current study. A latent profile analysis was performed to identify the developmental profiles. We examined profile characteristics and compared the parent-reported behavioural and emotional difficulties, ASD traits and ADHD traits at early school-age between the developmental profiles. We found four developmental profiles: ‘typical development’, ‘early advanced development’, ‘developmental catch-up’ and ‘developmental difficulties’. Being a boy was associated with the ‘developmental difficulties’ profile and being a girl and high parental educational level were associated with the ‘typical development’ profile. Children in the ‘developmental difficulties’ profile showed the most behavioural and emotional difficulties, ASD traits and ADHD traits The four profiles pointed to highly varying developmental patterns, underlining the inter- and intra-individual variability of development and showing the challenges of predicting later developmental outcome based on infancy assessments.
SN  - 1018-8827
SN  - 1435-165X
ER  -