Residual Tensile Strength of CFRP Panels with Dual Stepped-Lap Repairs: Effects of Ligament Spacing, Patch Lay-Up, and Repair Arrangement
- 1Department of Mechanical Engineering, TOBB University of Economics and Technology, Ankara 06560, Türkiye
Abstract
On-site repair of carbon fibre-reinforced polymer (CFRP) structures is widely employed when component removal and autoclave-based processing are impractical. However, existing repair guidelines provide limited guidance on the interaction between closely spaced repairs. The objective of this research is to investigate the coupled effects of ligament spacing, patch lay-up, and repair arrangement on the residual tensile strength of dual stepped-lap repaired composite panels. The methodology consists of a shell-based finite element model combining Hashin intralaminar damage and a mixed-mode bilinear cohesive zone model, which was validated against published experiments on damaged, stepped, and wet lay-up repaired laminates, predicting the measured strengths within 6.4%. Subsequently, fifteen repair configurations were analyzed, comprising four ligament spacings, three patch lay-up strategies, and two repair arrangements. Residual strength varied non-monotonically with ligament spacing for repairs arranged transverse to the loading direction. For the baseline patch, the strength retention factor increased from 0.57 for closely spaced repairs to a maximum of 0.85 at 120 mm, and decreased to 0.59 at 180 mm as the repairs approached the panel free edges. The compliant ±45° patch was the most sensitive to spacing (0.42–0.80), whereas the stiffness-matched patch varied only between 0.48 and 0.61. In contrast, in-line repairs showed limited sensitivity to spacing, retaining 0.72–0.77 of the intact strength. In conclusion, the results demonstrate that repair orientation relative to the principal load path governs the interaction between adjacent repairs more strongly than separation distance alone.
Related
- Uniaxial Tensile Behavior of β-InSe Nanosheets: Thickness-Dependent Strength and Progressive Failure
- Material-Level Shrinkage and Tensile-Performance Screening of High-Strength Polyethylene-Fibre Engineered Cementitious Composite (PE-ECC) Mortar: MgO Versus Liquid Shrinkage-Reducing Admixture
- Explainable ensemble learning with Bayesian Optimization for microstructure-driven tensile strength prediction and design optimization of Al–SiC metal matrix composites
- Effects of laser processing parameters and scanning angle on damage morphology and residual tensile properties of CFRP laminates with a continuum damage mechanics model
- Deformation-Aware Monte Carlo Assessment of a Bi2O3/Thermoplastic Polyurethane Shielding Surrogate Under Tensile Strain and Local Thickness Loss
BibTeX
@article{cambaz2026residual,
title = {{Residual Tensile Strength of CFRP Panels with Dual Stepped-Lap Repairs: Effects of Ligament Spacing, Patch Lay-Up, and Repair Arrangement}},
author = {Alihan Cambaz and Huseyin Enes Salman},
journal = {Polymers},
year = {2026},
month = nov,
doi = {10.3390/polym18212757},
url = {https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4360/18/21/2757},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Residual Tensile Strength of CFRP Panels with Dual Stepped-Lap Repairs: Effects of Ligament Spacing, Patch Lay-Up, and Repair Arrangement
AU - Alihan Cambaz
AU - Huseyin Enes Salman
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/11/05
JO - Polymers
DO - 10.3390/polym18212757
UR - https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4360/18/21/2757
AB - On-site repair of carbon fibre-reinforced polymer (CFRP) structures is widely employed when component removal and autoclave-based processing are impractical. However, existing repair guidelines provide limited guidance on the interaction between closely spaced repairs. The objective of this research is to investigate the coupled effects of ligament spacing, patch lay-up, and repair arrangement on the residual tensile strength of dual stepped-lap repaired composite panels. The methodology consists of a shell-based finite element model combining Hashin intralaminar damage and a mixed-mode bilinear cohesive zone model, which was validated against published experiments on damaged, stepped, and wet lay-up repaired laminates, predicting the measured strengths within 6.4%. Subsequently, fifteen repair configurations were analyzed, comprising four ligament spacings, three patch lay-up strategies, and two repair arrangements. Residual strength varied non-monotonically with ligament spacing for repairs arranged transverse to the loading direction. For the baseline patch, the strength retention factor increased from 0.57 for closely spaced repairs to a maximum of 0.85 at 120 mm, and decreased to 0.59 at 180 mm as the repairs approached the panel free edges. The compliant ±45° patch was the most sensitive to spacing (0.42–0.80), whereas the stiffness-matched patch varied only between 0.48 and 0.61. In contrast, in-line repairs showed limited sensitivity to spacing, retaining 0.72–0.77 of the intact strength. In conclusion, the results demonstrate that repair orientation relative to the principal load path governs the interaction between adjacent repairs more strongly than separation distance alone.
SN - 2073-4360
ER -