Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
201,683 studies31 sourcesUpdated 35 min ago
PreprintarXiv licencearXiv

There is no maximal K-degree

Abstract

The Kolmogorov complexity of a string characterize how complex it is to describe the string. If every prefix of a real x is more complex to describe than every prefix (of the same length) of real y, then it is seen as x is more complex to describe than y. It is wondered if there is a real x so that no other reals are strictly more complex (to describe) than x. The behavior of Kolmogorov complexity functions generated by reals (namely n↦ the minimal description length of the real) is quite chaos. Therefore, it is widely believed that there are many reals that are maximally complex to describe. For instance, it is conjectured that all random enough reals have maximal K-degree. In this paper, it is shown that there is no real with maximal K-degree. Actually, for almost all real x, we can uniformly computably find another real whose K-degree is strictly above x. The same construction also derives the following: (a) There is no maximal $C $-degree. (b) Every n-random real x admits an n-random real y such that y>Kx and y>C x; moreover, the difference of K-complexity and C-complexity of y,x (namely K(yupharpoonright n)−K(xupharpoonright n) and C(yupharpoonright n)−C(xupharpoonright n)) do not tend to infinity.

Related

  1. Total eight-colorings of maximal planar graphs of maximum degree six
    Enqiang Zhu
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textCombinatorics & discrete mathematicsarXiv
  2. Improved Lp maximal estimates for higher-degree Weyl sums
    Xuezhi Chen, Changxing Miao, Jiye Yuan +1
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textAlgebra & number theoryAnalysis & PDEsarXiv
  3. Maximal Hamiltonicity of realization graphs of degree sequences
    Jeffrey S. Baggett
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textCombinatorics & discrete mathematicsarXiv
  4. Currently, there are no reasons to doubt the Riemann Hypothesis: The zeta function beyond the realm of computation
    David W. Farmer
    Bulletin of the American Mathematical SocietyPeer-reviewedLicence not stated7 citedAlgebra & number theoryOpenAlex
  5. A simpler proof that there are no Landau--Siegel zeros
    Bryce Kerr
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textAlgebra & number theoryarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{liu2026there,
  title = {{There is no maximal $K$-degree}},
  author = {Lu Liu},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2609.11054},
  eprint = {2609.11054},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.11054},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - There is no maximal K-degree
AU  - Lu Liu
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/16
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2609.11054
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.11054
AB  - The Kolmogorov complexity of a string characterize how complex it is to describe the string. If every prefix of a real x is more complex to describe than every prefix (of the same length) of real y, then it is seen as x is more complex to describe than y. It is wondered if there is a real x so that no other reals are strictly more complex (to describe) than x. The behavior of Kolmogorov complexity functions generated by reals (namely n↦ the minimal description length of the real) is quite chaos. Therefore, it is widely believed that there are many reals that are maximally complex to describe. For instance, it is conjectured that all random enough reals have maximal K-degree. In this paper, it is shown that there is no real with maximal K-degree. Actually, for almost all real x, we can uniformly computably find another real whose K-degree is strictly above x. The same construction also derives the following: (a) There is no maximal $C $-degree. (b) Every n-random real x admits an n-random real y such that y>_Kx and y>_C x; moreover, the difference of K-complexity and C-complexity of y,x (namely K(yupharpoonright n)−K(xupharpoonright n) and C(yupharpoonright n)−C(xupharpoonright n)) do not tend to infinity.
ER  -