Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,952 studies31 sourcesUpdated 3 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Scientific Reports

Response surface optimization and ANFIS Prediction of abrasive waterjet machining in areca nut biofiller epoxy composites

Abstract

Abrasive waterjet machining (AWJM) of epoxy-10 wt.% areca nut biofiller composite was investigated using a face-centred central composite design in response surface methodology (RSM). Waterjet pressure (WJP), traverse speed (TS), abrasive flow rate (AFR), and stand-off distance (SoD) were varied to assess surface roughness (SR) and kerf angle (KA). Measured SR and KA ranged from 3.55 to 5.43 µm and 3.08 to 4.42°. Analysis of variance identified SoD as the dominant factor for both responses. Backward elimination improved the RSM predicted R ² from 0.8287 to 0.8553 (SR) and from 0.8954 to 0.9307 (KA). In the six-observation comparison, ANFIS achieved lower RMSE values (0.0313 µm and 0.0298°) than the backward-eliminated RSM models (0.0469 µm and 0.0462°) for SR and KA. ANFIS exhibited the lowest RMSE across all 30 observations (0.0859 µm and 0.0379°). Full-RSM desirability optimization identified 300 MPa WJP, 200 mm/min TS, 150 g/min AFR, and 1.5 mm SoD as the optimal conditions, with a desirability of 0.95. Confirmation experiments yielded 3.48 µm (SR) and 3.11° (KA), with prediction deviations of 3.53% and 2.81%. SEM observations revealed finer cutting tracks and fewer surface defects under optimized conditions. These findings highlight the complementary modelling capabilities of RSM and ANFIS for AWJM of biofiller-reinforced sustainable epoxy composites.

Related

  1. Characterization and multi-response optimization of epoxy–castor oil composites reinforced with coconut shell and marsh barbel powders
    A. Balaji, P. Prabhu, A. Arunkumar +5
    Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Crossref
  2. Prediction of the properties of sintered copper-graphite composites using response surface methodology
    Ankit, Vineet Kumar, Manvandra Kumar Singh +6
    PLOS OnePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textMaterials & polymersPLOS
  3. Explainable ensemble learning with Bayesian Optimization for microstructure-driven tensile strength prediction and design optimization of Al–SiC metal matrix composites
    Lakshmaiya Natrayan, Putta Nageswara rao, P. Hari Chandra Prasad +3
    Journal of Materials Research and TechnologyPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull text8 citedMaterials & polymersOpenAlex
  4. Development and multi-response optimization of sustainable hemp fibre/cassia gum reinforced polyester hybrid composites for structural and insulation applications
    Arunkumar Anbalagan, Elangovan Thangapandian, Baranitharan Paramasivam +7
    Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textMaterials & polymersCrossref
  5. Modular design and multi-objective performance optimization of an extended mechanical spindle for DH horizontal machining centers
    Xinchen Chen, Haiou Li, Chenxin Dong +1
    Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textCrossref
BibTeX
@article{murugadoss2026response,
  title = {{Response surface optimization and ANFIS Prediction of abrasive waterjet machining in areca nut biofiller epoxy composites}},
  author = {Palanivendhan Murugadoss and P. Vasanthkumar and N. Senthilkumar and Deepanraj Balakrishnan and Rajiv Selvam},
  journal = {Scientific Reports},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.1038/s41598-026-78440-2},
  url = {https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-026-78440-2},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Response surface optimization and ANFIS Prediction of abrasive waterjet machining in areca nut biofiller epoxy composites
AU  - Palanivendhan Murugadoss
AU  - P. Vasanthkumar
AU  - N. Senthilkumar
AU  - Deepanraj Balakrishnan
AU  - Rajiv Selvam
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/31
JO  - Scientific Reports
DO  - 10.1038/s41598-026-78440-2
UR  - https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-026-78440-2
AB  - Abrasive waterjet machining (AWJM) of epoxy-10 wt.% areca nut biofiller composite was investigated using a face-centred central composite design in response surface methodology (RSM). Waterjet pressure (WJP), traverse speed (TS), abrasive flow rate (AFR), and stand-off distance (SoD) were varied to assess surface roughness (SR) and kerf angle (KA). Measured SR and KA ranged from 3.55 to 5.43 µm and 3.08 to 4.42°. Analysis of variance identified SoD as the dominant factor for both responses. Backward elimination improved the RSM predicted R ² from 0.8287 to 0.8553 (SR) and from 0.8954 to 0.9307 (KA). In the six-observation comparison, ANFIS achieved lower RMSE values (0.0313 µm and 0.0298°) than the backward-eliminated RSM models (0.0469 µm and 0.0462°) for SR and KA. ANFIS exhibited the lowest RMSE across all 30 observations (0.0859 µm and 0.0379°). Full-RSM desirability optimization identified 300 MPa WJP, 200 mm/min TS, 150 g/min AFR, and 1.5 mm SoD as the optimal conditions, with a desirability of 0.95. Confirmation experiments yielded 3.48 µm (SR) and 3.11° (KA), with prediction deviations of 3.53% and 2.81%. SEM observations revealed finer cutting tracks and fewer surface defects under optimized conditions. These findings highlight the complementary modelling capabilities of RSM and ANFIS for AWJM of biofiller-reinforced sustainable epoxy composites.
SN  - 2045-2322
ER  -