Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 7 min ago
PreprintCC BY-NC-NDbioRxiv

Design and Construction of Three Customizable Pilot-Scale Hydroponic Systems

  1. 1University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign

Abstract

An increasing number of researchers, educators, and at-home growers are turning to hydroponics as an alternative method of food production, diversifying and strengthening the food supply chain. This has led to a substantial increase in the amount of academic work involving hydroponic production of plants for a variety of purposes, including but not limited to a more controlled and customizable environment than conventional production methods, utilizing hydroponics as a method of wastewater treatment, and investigating the vertical production of plants on a much smaller footprint than traditional commercial-scale production. Because so many unique stakeholders are interested in hydroponics for a variety of reasons, academic studies use a wide variety of hydroponic systems with varying levels of technology and automation, making comparisons across studies and systems challenging. A few institutions have sophisticated plant growth and research facilities, like those used by commercial companies, but these systems are often prohibitively expensive, costing upwards of $10,000 USD for a very limited amount of growing space for experimental trials. To enable more researchers, educators, and citizen scientists to conduct experiments and easily compare their results, this study details three pilot-scale hydroponic production systems (Kratky, NFT, and DWC), utilizing entirely off-the-shelf components, for under $5,000 USD each, that are capable of maintaining the desired consistent temperature and relative humidity levels, and have space for 216, 108 (6 irrigation loops), and 64 (16 irrigation bins) plants, respectively. The material lists and prices are provided along with assembly instructions and general guidelines for each hydroponic system. The testing and optimization process of environmental conditions within each growth system is also detailed, with suggested customizations for potential experimental setups. The authors developed these systems during their Masters and Doctoral degree programs, enabling improved hydroponic research at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign. They hope that other aspiring hydroponic researchers can benefit from this work in the development and operation of their hydroponic systems, increasing research efficiency and collaboration opportunities in this field of study.

Related

  1. Genomic surveillance-guided phage repository construction and rational cocktail design for carbapenem-resistant
    Miao Lei, Haoyu Guo, Yanzhang Guo +6
    Journal of InfectionPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textEcologyDOAJ
  2. Uncovering patterns and trait-based mechanisms of vegetation recovery over three time periods after low-impact seismic line construction in boreal uplands of northern Alberta
    Kellina L. Higgins, Anna Dabros, Daniel Belland +2
    Ecological IndicatorsPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textEcologyDOAJ
  3. Effect of microalgal biostimulants (Chlorella vulgaris and Arthrospira platensis) on the growth performance of Pak Choy in a hydroponic system.
    Isha Rasheed, Fong-Lee Ng, Ming-Li Teoh +4
    Tropical life sciences researchPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textPlant biologyEurope PMC
  4. Phenology-driven dynamic threshold iot control for hydroponic garlic sprout production
    Shuxin Chen, Yongchao Li, Panpan Liu +3
    Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textEcologyCrossref
  5. Nitrogen metabolism, plant growth, leaf gas exchange and stomata density under inoculation of Pseudomonas fluorescens and Azospirillum brasilense into hydroponic arugula
    Victória Moraes Giolo, Carlos Eduardo da Silva Oliveira, Vitória Almeida Moreira Girardi +9
    Frontiers in Plant SciencePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Plant biologyFrontiersCrossref
BibTeX
@misc{reynolds2026design,
  title = {{Design and Construction of Three Customizable Pilot-Scale Hydroponic Systems}},
  author = {L. P. Reynolds and B. N. Hollenback and P. C. Davidson},
  howpublished = {bioRxiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.64898/2026.09.24.747602},
  url = {https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.09.24.747602v1},
  note = {CC BY-NC-ND},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Design and Construction of Three Customizable Pilot-Scale Hydroponic Systems
AU  - L. P. Reynolds
AU  - B. N. Hollenback
AU  - P. C. Davidson
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/24
PB  - bioRxiv
DO  - 10.64898/2026.09.24.747602
UR  - https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.09.24.747602v1
AB  - An increasing number of researchers, educators, and at-home growers are turning to hydroponics as an alternative method of food production, diversifying and strengthening the food supply chain. This has led to a substantial increase in the amount of academic work involving hydroponic production of plants for a variety of purposes, including but not limited to a more controlled and customizable environment than conventional production methods, utilizing hydroponics as a method of wastewater treatment, and investigating the vertical production of plants on a much smaller footprint than traditional commercial-scale production. Because so many unique stakeholders are interested in hydroponics for a variety of reasons, academic studies use a wide variety of hydroponic systems with varying levels of technology and automation, making comparisons across studies and systems challenging. A few institutions have sophisticated plant growth and research facilities, like those used by commercial companies, but these systems are often prohibitively expensive, costing upwards of $10,000 USD for a very limited amount of growing space for experimental trials. To enable more researchers, educators, and citizen scientists to conduct experiments and easily compare their results, this study details three pilot-scale hydroponic production systems (Kratky, NFT, and DWC), utilizing entirely off-the-shelf components, for under $5,000 USD each, that are capable of maintaining the desired consistent temperature and relative humidity levels, and have space for 216, 108 (6 irrigation loops), and 64 (16 irrigation bins) plants, respectively. The material lists and prices are provided along with assembly instructions and general guidelines for each hydroponic system. The testing and optimization process of environmental conditions within each growth system is also detailed, with suggested customizations for potential experimental setups. The authors developed these systems during their Masters and Doctoral degree programs, enabling improved hydroponic research at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign. They hope that other aspiring hydroponic researchers can benefit from this work in the development and operation of their hydroponic systems, increasing research efficiency and collaboration opportunities in this field of study.
ER  -