Establishing baseline model performances for optical turbulence forecasting
Abstract
Accurate forecasting of optical turbulence (OT) is useful to optimise telescope scheduling and maximising observing efficiency, as the performance of adaptive optics systems strongly depends on turbulence conditions. While various numerical weather prediction and machine learning models are developed to predict these complex turbulence properties, properly evaluating their added value requires well-defined baseline reference models. This study establishes baseline performance thresholds for key astroclimatic parameters using two distinct models: one forecasting the parameter average over a specific timescale, and the other forecasting the temporal evolution over the same specific timescale. We apply these frameworks to extensive, multi-year datasets from the sites of the Very Large Telescope (VLT) and the Large Binocular Telescope (LBT) and discuss the possibility of extrapolating reference values of forecast performances for other sites based on their optical turbulence statistical characteristics. Our results show that baseline predictive accuracy varies according to the observing site, the specific parameter, the chosen timescale, and the forecasting approach. Therefore, an OT forecasting model's accuracy cannot be quantified in absolute terms, but relatively to the baseline.
Related
- R&D activity in INAF on light instrumentation for continuous optical turbulence monitoring
- Scientific performances of the XGIS instrument on-board THESEUS
- Post launch spectral and radiometric performances of MAJIS, the VIS-NIR imaging spectrometer of JUICE
- Type Ia supernova population machine – I. A unified cosmological simulation–binary synthesis framework establishing non-universal delay-time distributions and cosmic progenitor-channel dominance crossover
- A time-varying speed of light and implications for the evolution of the universe, Part I: Establishing a variable light speed model
BibTeX
@misc{sepibus2026establishing,
title = {{Establishing baseline model performances for optical turbulence forecasting}},
author = {M. De Sepibus and E. Masciadri and C. Weinberger and A. Otarola and S. Miesske and C. Veillet and S. Ragland},
howpublished = {arXiv},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2610.18702},
eprint = {2610.18702},
archivePrefix = {arXiv},
url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.18702},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - UNPB
TI - Establishing baseline model performances for optical turbulence forecasting
AU - M. De Sepibus
AU - E. Masciadri
AU - C. Weinberger
AU - A. Otarola
AU - S. Miesske
AU - C. Veillet
AU - S. Ragland
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/13
PB - arXiv
DO - 10.48550/arxiv.2610.18702
UR - https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.18702
AB - Accurate forecasting of optical turbulence (OT) is useful to optimise telescope scheduling and maximising observing efficiency, as the performance of adaptive optics systems strongly depends on turbulence conditions. While various numerical weather prediction and machine learning models are developed to predict these complex turbulence properties, properly evaluating their added value requires well-defined baseline reference models. This study establishes baseline performance thresholds for key astroclimatic parameters using two distinct models: one forecasting the parameter average over a specific timescale, and the other forecasting the temporal evolution over the same specific timescale. We apply these frameworks to extensive, multi-year datasets from the sites of the Very Large Telescope (VLT) and the Large Binocular Telescope (LBT) and discuss the possibility of extrapolating reference values of forecast performances for other sites based on their optical turbulence statistical characteristics. Our results show that baseline predictive accuracy varies according to the observing site, the specific parameter, the chosen timescale, and the forecasting approach. Therefore, an OT forecasting model's accuracy cannot be quantified in absolute terms, but relatively to the baseline.
ER -