Menstrual poverty, menstrual attitudes, and genital hygiene behaviors among adolescents: a cross-sectional study
Abstract
Background. This study aimed to examine the relationships between menstrual poverty, menstrual attitudes, and genital hygiene behaviors among adolescents, and to evaluate the influence of socio-demographic factors.
Methods. A cross-sectional study was conducted with 215 adolescent girls aged 15–19 years in Türkiye. Data were collected online using a questionnaire including socio-demographic information and three validated scales: Menstrual Poverty Scale (MPS), Menstrual Attitude Questionnaire (MAQ), and Genital Hygiene Behavior Scale (GHBS). Descriptive statistics, t-tests, ANOVA, Pearson correlations, and multiple linear regression analyses were performed.
Results. The mean age at menarche was 12.55 ± 1.16 years. MPS scores indicated moderate menstrual poverty, with the poorest scores for product access. MAQ scores were highest for Anticipation and Prediction and lowest for Denial of Any Effect, while GHBS averaged 87.11 ± 10.15. Associations between menstrual attitudes and hygiene behaviors were weak. Reporting stigma or shame, rather than economic reasons, as the main barrier to accessing menstrual products predicted lower menstrual poverty scores (adjusted R2 = 6.9%). Menstrual irregularity was the only independent predictor of genital hygiene behaviors (adjusted R2 = 12.9%).
Conclusions. Menstrual poverty and genital hygiene behaviors were only partly explained by the variables examined. Economic barriers remained relevant to menstrual poverty, whereas menstrual irregularity was independently associated with higher genital hygiene behavior scores. Menstrual attitudes showed limited independent associations with the outcomes. The modest explanatory power of both regression models suggests that broader structural, familial, educational, and environmental factors should be considered. Interventions should combine affordable access to menstrual products with comprehensive menstrual education and supportive family, school, and community environments.
Related
- Educational videos vs interactive e-modules: adolescents’ menstrual hygiene knowledge, attitudes, and practices
- Educational videos vs interactive e-modules: adolescents’ menstrual hygiene knowledge, attitudes, and practices
- Current situation and influencing factors of knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors related to depression among parents of adolescents with depression
- Knowledge, attitudes, and preventive behaviors regarding myopia among adults in Palestine: a cross-sectional online convenience-sample survey
- Socio-ecological risk factors associated with different health-risk behaviors among Chinese adolescents: a cross-sectional study
BibTeX
@article{tuncer2026menstrual,
title = {{Menstrual poverty, menstrual attitudes, and genital hygiene behaviors among adolescents: a cross-sectional study}},
author = {Merve Tuncer and Elifnur Güneş and Özlem Şensoy},
journal = {The Turkish Journal of Pediatrics},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.24953/turkjpediatr.2026.8368},
url = {https://doi.org/10.24953/turkjpediatr.2026.8368},
note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Menstrual poverty, menstrual attitudes, and genital hygiene behaviors among adolescents: a cross-sectional study
AU - Merve Tuncer
AU - Elifnur Güneş
AU - Özlem Şensoy
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/28
JO - The Turkish Journal of Pediatrics
DO - 10.24953/turkjpediatr.2026.8368
UR - https://doi.org/10.24953/turkjpediatr.2026.8368
AB - Background. This study aimed to examine the relationships between menstrual poverty, menstrual attitudes, and genital hygiene behaviors among adolescents, and to evaluate the influence of socio-demographic factors. Methods. A cross-sectional study was conducted with 215 adolescent girls aged 15–19 years in Türkiye. Data were collected online using a questionnaire including socio-demographic information and three validated scales: Menstrual Poverty Scale (MPS), Menstrual Attitude Questionnaire (MAQ), and Genital Hygiene Behavior Scale (GHBS). Descriptive statistics, t-tests, ANOVA, Pearson correlations, and multiple linear regression analyses were performed. Results. The mean age at menarche was 12.55 ± 1.16 years. MPS scores indicated moderate menstrual poverty, with the poorest scores for product access. MAQ scores were highest for Anticipation and Prediction and lowest for Denial of Any Effect, while GHBS averaged 87.11 ± 10.15. Associations between menstrual attitudes and hygiene behaviors were weak. Reporting stigma or shame, rather than economic reasons, as the main barrier to accessing menstrual products predicted lower menstrual poverty scores (adjusted R2 = 6.9%). Menstrual irregularity was the only independent predictor of genital hygiene behaviors (adjusted R2 = 12.9%). Conclusions. Menstrual poverty and genital hygiene behaviors were only partly explained by the variables examined. Economic barriers remained relevant to menstrual poverty, whereas menstrual irregularity was independently associated with higher genital hygiene behavior scores. Menstrual attitudes showed limited independent associations with the outcomes. The modest explanatory power of both regression models suggests that broader structural, familial, educational, and environmental factors should be considered. Interventions should combine affordable access to menstrual products with comprehensive menstrual education and supportive family, school, and community environments.
SN - 0041-4301
SN - 2791-6421
ER -