Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
186,631 studies31 sourcesUpdated 34 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY-NC 4.0The European Journal of Public Health

Nature-based social prescribing for children across care settings: baseline findings from CONNECT

Abstract

Background: Children and adolescents with psychosocial difficulties face barriers to mental health care, particularly in deprived areas. Social prescribing is a non-clinical, family-centered approach connecting children and families to community activities to improve wellbeing. It may foster psychosocial well-being and equity. The CONNECT project evaluates a nature-based social prescribing intervention.

Methods: We report baseline characteristics. Children and adolescents (6–17 years) with psychosocial difficulties were referred by professionals to a linkworker, who co-designed an 8–12-week plan prioritising nature-based activities. Caregivers completed the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ; abnormal ≥17) and Parental Stress Scale (PSS), among other measures.

Results: Of 76 referred, 57 dyads completed baseline; recruitment is ongoing. Participants had mean age 11.2 years (SD 2.8), 52.6% girls; caregivers were 89.5% women, 82.5% mothers and 24.6% unemployed. Main referral reasons included anxiety, depressed mood, sedentarism/obesity and social interaction difficulties; school learning was most affected (60.5% moderate-to-severe), and 93% of difficulties had lasted over one year (SDQ impact supplement). Mean SDQ Total was 15.3 (SD 6.9), with 45.6% scoring in the abnormal (clinical) range and 10.5% in the borderline range (56.1% clinically relevant). Hyperactivity/inattention was the highest subscale (M = 5.9). Profiles differed by referral setting (71.4% in the clinical range in mental health services vs. 25.0% in primary care). Mean PSS was 30.2 (SD 7.6); SDQ correlated with parental stress (r = 0.42, p = 0.002).

Conclusions: Baseline data show a high and chronic burden of psychosocial difficulties, with over half of participants in the borderline or clinical range and school functioning most affected. Differences by referral setting highlight the need for tailored implementation and support nature-based social prescribing as a promising approach.

Key messages: • Over half of children presented clinically relevant psychosocial difficulties, highlighting unmet needs in underserved populations.

• Nature-based social prescribing may offer a feasible, community-based approach to improve child mental health and support families.

Related

  1. Fecal biomarkers to characterize intestinal inflammation among children with medically attended diarrhea across six low-resource settings: Findings from the Enterics for Global Health (EFGH) Shigella surveillance study
    Bri’Anna Horne, Brian Otieno Onyando, Henry Badji +35
    PLOS Neglected Tropical DiseasesPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textMicrobiologyPhysiologyPLOS
  2. Effectiveness of green health prescribing and nature-based interventions in primary care and community settings for older adults: a systematic review of health, wellbeing and social outcomes
    Furqan Butt, Jeremiah Donoghue, Cameron Ley +10
    BMC MedicinePeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textPharmacology & toxicologyCrossref
  3. The United States CADASIL Consortium: Baseline Findings from a Natural History Study
    J. S. Paulsen, H. J. Bockholt, W. H. Adams +23
    medRxivPreprintAll rights reservedFull textNeurologymedRxiv
  4. Role of patient sex in prescribing long-term beta blockers after myocardial infarction in German-speaking European primary care settings: a cross-sectional online survey using case vignettes
    Rahel Grindat, Katharina T Jungo, Kali Tal +6
    BMJ OpenPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textCardiovascular medicineCrossrefPMC
  5. Baseline Liver Metabolic Health in Newly Diagnosed People Living with HIV Compared with HIV-Negative Controls: Cross-Sectional Findings from the Prospective MASHIV-TR Cohort.
    Çiğdem Mermutluoğlu, Yeşim Taşova, Ayşe Özlem Mete +17
    International journal of molecular sciencesPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textEpidemiology & public healthEurope PMC
BibTeX
@article{marques2026naturebased,
  title = {{Nature-based social prescribing for children across care settings: baseline findings from CONNECT}},
  author = {M J Marques and A R Goes and V Morgado and A Gama and S Dias},
  journal = {The European Journal of Public Health},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.1093/eurpub/ckag169.1737},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckag169.1737},
  note = {CC BY-NC 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Nature-based social prescribing for children across care settings: baseline findings from CONNECT
AU  - M J Marques
AU  - A R Goes
AU  - V Morgado
AU  - A Gama
AU  - S Dias
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/01
JO  - The European Journal of Public Health
DO  - 10.1093/eurpub/ckag169.1737
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckag169.1737
AB  - Background: Children and adolescents with psychosocial difficulties face barriers to mental health care, particularly in deprived areas. Social prescribing is a non-clinical, family-centered approach connecting children and families to community activities to improve wellbeing. It may foster psychosocial well-being and equity. The CONNECT project evaluates a nature-based social prescribing intervention.  Methods: We report baseline characteristics. Children and adolescents (6–17 years) with psychosocial difficulties were referred by professionals to a linkworker, who co-designed an 8–12-week plan prioritising nature-based activities. Caregivers completed the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ; abnormal ≥17) and Parental Stress Scale (PSS), among other measures.  Results: Of 76 referred, 57 dyads completed baseline; recruitment is ongoing. Participants had mean age 11.2 years (SD 2.8), 52.6% girls; caregivers were 89.5% women, 82.5% mothers and 24.6% unemployed. Main referral reasons included anxiety, depressed mood, sedentarism/obesity and social interaction difficulties; school learning was most affected (60.5% moderate-to-severe), and 93% of difficulties had lasted over one year (SDQ impact supplement). Mean SDQ Total was 15.3 (SD 6.9), with 45.6% scoring in the abnormal (clinical) range and 10.5% in the borderline range (56.1% clinically relevant). Hyperactivity/inattention was the highest subscale (M = 5.9). Profiles differed by referral setting (71.4% in the clinical range in mental health services vs. 25.0% in primary care). Mean PSS was 30.2 (SD 7.6); SDQ correlated with parental stress (r = 0.42, p = 0.002).  Conclusions: Baseline data show a high and chronic burden of psychosocial difficulties, with over half of participants in the borderline or clinical range and school functioning most affected. Differences by referral setting highlight the need for tailored implementation and support nature-based social prescribing as a promising approach.  Key messages: • Over half of children presented clinically relevant psychosocial difficulties, highlighting unmet needs in underserved populations.  • Nature-based social prescribing may offer a feasible, community-based approach to improve child mental health and support families.
SN  - 1101-1262
SN  - 1464-360X
ER  -