Cas12a cleavage and trimming kinetics reveal mismatches as a tool to steer editing
Abstract
Gene knockouts by CRISPR-Cas nucleases rely on targeted DNA cleavage and error-prone DNA repair: end-joining pathways can introduce insertions and deletions that assist in disrupting the coding sequence. However, only a fraction of edits achieves this, and an unfavorable array of repair outcomes typically requires switching to another editing technology. Key factors that influence repair are the types and lengths of DNA ends following cleavage. Here, we investigated Cas12a's ability to produce different ends and if they can be used to redistribute editing outcomes. We determined the sites and rates of target cleavage by Cas12a in vitro by combining kinetic modeling with nucleotide-resolution assays. Here, we show that trimming - repeated cleavage of an already cut target - occurs about 4x faster than initial cleavage; it also presents alternative DNA end structures for cellular repair. We also introduced specific mismatches to the gRNA: Cas12a maintained fast target cleavage, but changed where the target was cleaved and how quickly it was trimmed, compared to matched gRNA. We exploited the differences in cleavage kinetics between matched and mismatched gRNAs to develop reprogrammed gRNAs, i.e. rpgRNAs. Intentionally-mismatched rpgRNAs retained the high editing efficiency observed with traditional gRNAs. However, they shifted editing between in-frame and out-of-frame outcomes to enhance gene knockout success across genes. Reprogrammed gRNAs offer an efficient way to steer editing toward such preferred outcomes, while retaining the simplicity of gene editing with CRISPR-Cas nucleases.
Related
- Phosphate‐Engineered DNA Reporters Boost CRISPR‐Cas12a Trans‐Cleavage for Rapid and Sensitive Nucleic Acid Detection
- Toward transgenic multicellular parasites: CRISPR-Cas12a germline editing of Schistosoma mansoni eggs as key to success
- Using Polycistronic gRNAs and a tRNA Cleavage System in CRISPR-Based Genome Editing of Toxoplasma gondii
- Faecal microbiota transplant revisited - potential metabolic outcomes of regional microbiome mismatches.
- Ultrafast visual detection of Streptococcus suis via HtpsC‐targeted LAMP–CRISPR–Cas12a coupled with lateral flow immunochromatography
BibTeX
@misc{ahmed2026cas12a,
title = {{Cas12a cleavage and trimming kinetics reveal mismatches as a tool to steer editing}},
author = {U. Ahmed and F. Michneviciute and M. Vinogradovas and E. Dirvelyte-Valauske and U. Neniskyte and S. K. Jones},
howpublished = {bioRxiv},
year = {2026},
month = aug,
doi = {10.64898/2026.08.31.748204},
url = {https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.08.31.748204v1},
note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY - UNPB
TI - Cas12a cleavage and trimming kinetics reveal mismatches as a tool to steer editing
AU - U. Ahmed
AU - F. Michneviciute
AU - M. Vinogradovas
AU - E. Dirvelyte-Valauske
AU - U. Neniskyte
AU - S. K. Jones
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/08/31
PB - bioRxiv
DO - 10.64898/2026.08.31.748204
UR - https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.08.31.748204v1
AB - Gene knockouts by CRISPR-Cas nucleases rely on targeted DNA cleavage and error-prone DNA repair: end-joining pathways can introduce insertions and deletions that assist in disrupting the coding sequence. However, only a fraction of edits achieves this, and an unfavorable array of repair outcomes typically requires switching to another editing technology. Key factors that influence repair are the types and lengths of DNA ends following cleavage. Here, we investigated Cas12a's ability to produce different ends and if they can be used to redistribute editing outcomes. We determined the sites and rates of target cleavage by Cas12a in vitro by combining kinetic modeling with nucleotide-resolution assays. Here, we show that trimming - repeated cleavage of an already cut target - occurs about 4x faster than initial cleavage; it also presents alternative DNA end structures for cellular repair. We also introduced specific mismatches to the gRNA: Cas12a maintained fast target cleavage, but changed where the target was cleaved and how quickly it was trimmed, compared to matched gRNA. We exploited the differences in cleavage kinetics between matched and mismatched gRNAs to develop reprogrammed gRNAs, i.e. rpgRNAs. Intentionally-mismatched rpgRNAs retained the high editing efficiency observed with traditional gRNAs. However, they shifted editing between in-frame and out-of-frame outcomes to enhance gene knockout success across genes. Reprogrammed gRNAs offer an efficient way to steer editing toward such preferred outcomes, while retaining the simplicity of gene editing with CRISPR-Cas nucleases.
ER -