Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
194,161 studies31 sourcesUpdated 26 min ago
PreprintCC BYbioRxiv

Using Polycistronic gRNAs and a tRNA Cleavage System in CRISPR-Based Genome Editing of Toxoplasma gondii

  1. 1Dept. of Life Sciences, Imperial College London

Abstract

CRISPR/Cas9 is widely used for genetic manipulation in Toxoplasma gondii, but optimizing gRNA expression and multiplexed editing remains challenging. Here, we evaluated alternative promoters, gRNA scaffolds, and a tRNA-based polycistronic system to improve editing efficiency and reduce synthetic DNA costs. Four constructs targeting the SAG1 locus were used to compare the U6 and H1 promoters, as well as standard and modified gRNA scaffolds. U6-driven constructs supported robust gRNA-targeted Cas9 activity, whereas H1-driven constructs failed to produce detectable phenotypes. The alternative gRNA scaffold, modified by a number of base changes and insertions, increased knockout efficiency compared to the standard scaffold. To simplify dual gRNA-based methods, we establish a tRNA-based polycistronic system to simultaneously target two independent loci. Targeting the SAG1 and UPRT locus for proof-of-concept, all U6-driven polycistronic constructs conferred efficient SAG1 knockout and 5-fluorodeoxyuridine resistance, whereas H1-driven constructs exhibited position-dependent activity, with only the 3' gRNA being functional. These results demonstrate that U6-driven, tRNA-based polycistronic gRNA expression enables reliable multiplexed genome editing in T. gondii, with the minimal H1 promoter being insufficient for consistent multi-gRNA activity. This optimized system provides a scalable framework for dual-gRNA CRISPR strategies in this organism.

Related

  1. Treatment of Shiga toxin–producing E. coli infection by CRISPR-Cas–targeted cleavage of the Shiga toxin gene in animal models
    Matthieu Galtier, Antonina O. Krawczyk, Fabien J. Fuche +26
    Science Translational MedicinePeer-reviewedLicence not stated10 citedMolecular biology & gene regulationOpenAlex
  2. A phage DUF669 protein mediates post-cleavage DNA repair against host CRISPR immunity.
    Heng Zhu, Shengkun Dai, Hewen Deng +6
    Nature communicationsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textMolecular biology & gene regulationEurope PMC
  3. Phosphate‐Engineered DNA Reporters Boost CRISPR‐Cas12a Trans‐Cleavage for Rapid and Sensitive Nucleic Acid Detection
    Rui Yang, Chong Guo, Minjie Pei +9
    Advanced SciencePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textMolecular biology & gene regulationPMCEurope PMC
  4. Cas12a cleavage and trimming kinetics reveal mismatches as a tool to steer editing
    U. Ahmed, F. Michneviciute, M. Vinogradovas +3
    bioRxivPreprintCC BYFull textMolecular biology & gene regulationbioRxiv
  5. CasNano: An ultracompact CRISPR-Cas12f with a GC-rich PAM for epigenome editing with therapeutic potential
    Dongkyeong Kim, Chia-Wei Huang, Richard Pan +5
    Molecular therapy. Nucleic acidsPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textMolecular biology & gene regulationEurope PMC
BibTeX
@misc{grech2026using,
  title = {{Using Polycistronic gRNAs and a tRNA Cleavage System in CRISPR-Based Genome Editing of Toxoplasma gondii}},
  author = {J. C. Grech and M. Teng and R. Wang and M. A. Child},
  howpublished = {bioRxiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.64898/2026.10.12.755625},
  url = {https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.10.12.755625v1},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Using Polycistronic gRNAs and a tRNA Cleavage System in CRISPR-Based Genome Editing of Toxoplasma gondii
AU  - J. C. Grech
AU  - M. Teng
AU  - R. Wang
AU  - M. A. Child
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/12
PB  - bioRxiv
DO  - 10.64898/2026.10.12.755625
UR  - https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.10.12.755625v1
AB  - CRISPR/Cas9 is widely used for genetic manipulation in Toxoplasma gondii, but optimizing gRNA expression and multiplexed editing remains challenging. Here, we evaluated alternative promoters, gRNA scaffolds, and a tRNA-based polycistronic system to improve editing efficiency and reduce synthetic DNA costs. Four constructs targeting the SAG1 locus were used to compare the U6 and H1 promoters, as well as standard and modified gRNA scaffolds. U6-driven constructs supported robust gRNA-targeted Cas9 activity, whereas H1-driven constructs failed to produce detectable phenotypes. The alternative gRNA scaffold, modified by a number of base changes and insertions, increased knockout efficiency compared to the standard scaffold. To simplify dual gRNA-based methods, we establish a tRNA-based polycistronic system to simultaneously target two independent loci. Targeting the SAG1 and UPRT locus for proof-of-concept, all U6-driven polycistronic constructs conferred efficient SAG1 knockout and 5-fluorodeoxyuridine resistance, whereas H1-driven constructs exhibited position-dependent activity, with only the 3' gRNA being functional. These results demonstrate that U6-driven, tRNA-based polycistronic gRNA expression enables reliable multiplexed genome editing in T. gondii, with the minimal H1 promoter being insufficient for consistent multi-gRNA activity. This optimized system provides a scalable framework for dual-gRNA CRISPR strategies in this organism.
ER  -