Persistent Socioeconomic Concentration of Cesarean Delivery in Peru Across Selected Survey-Based Obstetric Marker Strata: A Serial Cross-Sectional Analysis of ENDES Rounds, 2018-2024.
- 1Facultad de Medicina (FAMED), Universidad Nacional Toribio Rodríguez de Mendoza de Amazonas (UNTRM), Chachapoyas 01001, Peru.
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Cesarean delivery is essential when clinically indicated, but socioeconomic differences in utilization may reflect differences in access, care pathways, preferences, provider practice, or facility characteristics. This study estimated survey-round-specific weighted prevalence of cesarean delivery by household wealth in Peru, quantified socioeconomic inequality, and examined whether the gradient persisted after sequential adjustment and across selected survey-based obstetric marker strata. Methods: We conducted a serial cross-sectional analysis of ENDES (Encuesta Nacional Demográfica y de Salud Familiar) rounds 2018-2024 using each woman's most recent live birth occurring 0-59 months before interview. The official annual REC0111, REC21, and REC41 modules were linked using audited woman- and birth-level keys. Survey-round-specific analyses used original sampling weights; pooled analyses normalized weights within each round so that all seven rounds contributed equally. We estimated Q5-Q1 gaps and ratios, conventional, Wagstaff-normalized, and Erreygers concentration indices, and survey-adjusted Poisson prevalence ratios. A sensitivity analysis was restricted to births in the preceding 12 months. Results: The analytic sample included 127,469 most recent live births. Equal-round weighted cesarean prevalence was 37.31% (95% CI, 36.92-37.70), ranging from 17.67% in Q1 to 61.90% in Q5; the absolute gap was 44.23 percentage points (95% CI, 42.92-45.54) and the ratio was 3.50 (95% CI, 3.38-3.64). The conventional, Wagstaff, and Erreygers indices were 0.228, 0.363, and 0.340, respectively. In the primary conditional model, the Q5-versus-Q1 prevalence ratio was 1.94 (95% CI, 1.84-2.04). The gradient remained in the 12-month sensitivity analysis (PR, 2.07; 95% CI, 1.86-2.30) and across marker strata. Conclusions: Cesarean delivery among recent live births represented in ENDES was consistently concentrated among wealthier women. These findings document socioeconomic inequality in utilization but do not distinguish clinically appropriate use, overuse, or unmet need.
Related
- Maternal characteristics, clinical indications, and neonatal outcomes in cesarean hysterectomy: A cross-sectional study
- The Association of a Previous Cesarean Section with Birth Weight and Gestational Age Among Women in the Second Pregnancy in Eastern Sudan: A Cross-Sectional Study
- Dietary Intake Relative to Japanese Reference Values During Late Pregnancy Among Japanese Women Undergoing Scheduled Cesarean Delivery: A Single-Center Cross-Sectional Study
- Postoperative Pain and Treatment Satisfaction among Women Receiving Transversus Abdominis Plane Block after Cesarean Delivery: A Cross-Sectional Study
- Sociodemographic and Perinatal Correlates of Perceived Obstetric Violence in Spain: A Cross-Sectional Study Informed by an Intersectional Framework.
BibTeX
@article{veraponce2026persistent,
title = {{Persistent Socioeconomic Concentration of Cesarean Delivery in Peru Across Selected Survey-Based Obstetric Marker Strata: A Serial Cross-Sectional Analysis of ENDES Rounds, 2018-2024.}},
author = {Víctor Juan Vera-Ponce and Fiorella E Zuzunaga-Montoya and Marcos Daniel García-Rodríguez and Witre Omar Padilla and José Celso Paredes Carranza},
journal = {Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland)},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.3390/healthcare14193263},
url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42881703},
note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Persistent Socioeconomic Concentration of Cesarean Delivery in Peru Across Selected Survey-Based Obstetric Marker Strata: A Serial Cross-Sectional Analysis of ENDES Rounds, 2018-2024.
AU - Víctor Juan Vera-Ponce
AU - Fiorella E Zuzunaga-Montoya
AU - Marcos Daniel García-Rodríguez
AU - Witre Omar Padilla
AU - José Celso Paredes Carranza
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/02
JO - Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland)
DO - 10.3390/healthcare14193263
UR - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42881703
AB - Background/Objectives: Cesarean delivery is essential when clinically indicated, but socioeconomic differences in utilization may reflect differences in access, care pathways, preferences, provider practice, or facility characteristics. This study estimated survey-round-specific weighted prevalence of cesarean delivery by household wealth in Peru, quantified socioeconomic inequality, and examined whether the gradient persisted after sequential adjustment and across selected survey-based obstetric marker strata. Methods: We conducted a serial cross-sectional analysis of ENDES (Encuesta Nacional Demográfica y de Salud Familiar) rounds 2018-2024 using each woman's most recent live birth occurring 0-59 months before interview. The official annual REC0111, REC21, and REC41 modules were linked using audited woman- and birth-level keys. Survey-round-specific analyses used original sampling weights; pooled analyses normalized weights within each round so that all seven rounds contributed equally. We estimated Q5-Q1 gaps and ratios, conventional, Wagstaff-normalized, and Erreygers concentration indices, and survey-adjusted Poisson prevalence ratios. A sensitivity analysis was restricted to births in the preceding 12 months. Results: The analytic sample included 127,469 most recent live births. Equal-round weighted cesarean prevalence was 37.31% (95% CI, 36.92-37.70), ranging from 17.67% in Q1 to 61.90% in Q5; the absolute gap was 44.23 percentage points (95% CI, 42.92-45.54) and the ratio was 3.50 (95% CI, 3.38-3.64). The conventional, Wagstaff, and Erreygers indices were 0.228, 0.363, and 0.340, respectively. In the primary conditional model, the Q5-versus-Q1 prevalence ratio was 1.94 (95% CI, 1.84-2.04). The gradient remained in the 12-month sensitivity analysis (PR, 2.07; 95% CI, 1.86-2.30) and across marker strata. Conclusions: Cesarean delivery among recent live births represented in ENDES was consistently concentrated among wealthier women. These findings document socioeconomic inequality in utilization but do not distinguish clinically appropriate use, overuse, or unmet need.
SN - 2227-9032
ER -