High-intensity interval training in cancer patients: a bayesian meta-analysis of effects on VO2max, dose–response, and adherence
4 affiliations
- 1College of Athletics and Physical Education, Beijing Sport University
- 2Zhongguancun Third Primary School Science Park Branch
- 3Division of Sport Science and Physical Education, Tsinghua University
- 4Department of Physical Education, Peking University
Abstract
Background Cancer treatment impairs cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF), an independent prognostic indicator in cancer populations. High-intensity interval training (HIIT) improves maximal oxygen uptake (VO2max), but existing meta-analyses have relied on frequentist approaches without probabilistic expression of clinical relevance and have analyzed dose–response and adherence in isolation. Methods Four databases were searched through 1 April 2026 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of HIIT versus non-exercise controls reporting VO2max. Mean differences (MDs) were pooled using a Bayesian three-level random-effects model, with the posterior median, 95% credible interval (CrI), probability of direction (pd), Bayes factor (BF10), and the posterior probability of exceeding a prespecified threshold of 1.0 mL·kg⁻1·min⁻1 reported. Functional-form comparison was applied to 14 dose moderators, and certainty of evidence was rated using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. Results Sixteen RCTs contributing 35 effect sizes were included. HIIT increased VO2max by 2.61 mL·kg⁻1·min⁻1 versus non-exercise controls (95% CrI: 1.68 to 3.51), with pd = 1.00 and a 99.96% posterior probability of exceeding the threshold. The primary effect remained stable across all subgroup and sensitivity analyses. Dose–response curves showed minimal variation, and only the number of intervals reached pd = 0.95 among the 14 moderators. Mean adherence was 85.7%, with no prescription parameter showing a statistically significant association. Certainty of evidence was rated moderate. Conclusions HIIT reliably improves VO2max in cancer patients, with near-certain posterior probability of exceeding clinical relevance. Dose–response and adherence analyses were exploratory and underpowered and do not support dose equivalence. Interval number was the only directional signal and may warrant further investigation.
Related
- Patients' experiences of and adherence to supervised high-intensity physical training integrated into specialised treatment for substance use disorders: study protocol for a qualitative collaborative health services study of facilitators and barriers.
- Moderate-intensity exercise versus high-intensity interval training to determine the optimal training intensity for walking rehabilitation in chronic stroke (HIT-Stroke Trial 2): a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
- School-based high-intensity interval training for children: a focused systematic review of implementation and school-relevant outcomes
- Targeting cGMP pathways: the impact of vericiguat and high intensity interval training on mammary cancer progression in female mice
- High-intensity interval training and moderate-intensity continuous training versus usual care in adults with familial hypercholesterolaemia: protocol for the UPPA-FH three-arm randomised trial
BibTeX
@article{zhang2026highintensity,
title = {{High-intensity interval training in cancer patients: a bayesian meta-analysis of effects on VO2max, dose–response, and adherence}},
author = {Jianbo Zhang and Jingjing Tao and Frank Li Wen Teo and May Xin Yu Teo},
journal = {BMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitation},
year = {2026},
month = jul,
doi = {10.1186/s13102-026-01876-6},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1186/s13102-026-01876-6},
note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - High-intensity interval training in cancer patients: a bayesian meta-analysis of effects on VO2max, dose–response, and adherence
AU - Jianbo Zhang
AU - Jingjing Tao
AU - Frank Li Wen Teo
AU - May Xin Yu Teo
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/07/01
JO - BMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitation
DO - 10.1186/s13102-026-01876-6
UR - https://doi.org/10.1186/s13102-026-01876-6
AB - Background Cancer treatment impairs cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF), an independent prognostic indicator in cancer populations. High-intensity interval training (HIIT) improves maximal oxygen uptake (VO2max), but existing meta-analyses have relied on frequentist approaches without probabilistic expression of clinical relevance and have analyzed dose–response and adherence in isolation. Methods Four databases were searched through 1 April 2026 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of HIIT versus non-exercise controls reporting VO2max. Mean differences (MDs) were pooled using a Bayesian three-level random-effects model, with the posterior median, 95% credible interval (CrI), probability of direction (pd), Bayes factor (BF10), and the posterior probability of exceeding a prespecified threshold of 1.0 mL·kg⁻1·min⁻1 reported. Functional-form comparison was applied to 14 dose moderators, and certainty of evidence was rated using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. Results Sixteen RCTs contributing 35 effect sizes were included. HIIT increased VO2max by 2.61 mL·kg⁻1·min⁻1 versus non-exercise controls (95% CrI: 1.68 to 3.51), with pd = 1.00 and a 99.96% posterior probability of exceeding the threshold. The primary effect remained stable across all subgroup and sensitivity analyses. Dose–response curves showed minimal variation, and only the number of intervals reached pd = 0.95 among the 14 moderators. Mean adherence was 85.7%, with no prescription parameter showing a statistically significant association. Certainty of evidence was rated moderate. Conclusions HIIT reliably improves VO2max in cancer patients, with near-certain posterior probability of exceeding clinical relevance. Dose–response and adherence analyses were exploratory and underpowered and do not support dose equivalence. Interval number was the only directional signal and may warrant further investigation.
SN - 2052-1847
ER -