Understanding the complex systems driving the perceived obesogenic environment among adults in socioeconomically disadvantaged situations: Findings from a participatory Group Model Building process in Flanders
8 affiliations
- 1Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Sciensano, Leuven, Belgium
- 2Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universiteit Gent, Ghent, Belgium
- 3Department of Adult Educational Sciences, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Brussels, Belgium
- 4Society and Ageing Research Lab (SARLab), Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Brussels, Belgium
- 5Department of Geography, Faculty of Sciences, Universiteit Gent, Ghent, Belgium
- 6Department of Movement and Sport Sciences, Faculty of Physical Education and Physiotherapy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Brussels, Belgium
- 7Department of Movement and Sports Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universiteit Gent, Ghent, Belgium
- 8Access-To-Medicines Research Centre, Faculty of Economics and Business, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
Abstract
Introduction: Persons in socioeconomically disadvantaged situations are disproportionally exposed to obesogenic environments and often have fewer resources to counteract their influence, resulting in poorer dietary outcomes and lower levels of physical activity. This study aimed to map the complex systems within the municipal obesogenic environment driving unhealthy eating behaviors and insufficient walking among adults in socioeconomically disadvantaged situations in Flanders, and to identify potential actions for local policymakers. Methods: Participatory group model building (GMB), a qualitative system dynamics method, was used to engage adults in socioeconomically disadvantaged situations (n = 7), local decision makers (n = 7) and local non-government stakeholders (n = 7) in two peri-urban Flemish municipalities. Two GMB sessions over two days were held in each municipality during which a causal loop diagram (CLD) was created and potential actions were identified for local policymakers by considering causal pathways and reinforcing loops in the system. Results: The CLD represents participants’ perceptions of how the local obesogenic environment contributes to unhealthy eating and insufficient walking among adults in socioeconomically disadvantaged situations. Six interconnected subsystems were identified: 1) social context, 2) facilities and activities, 3) mobility options, 4) information, 5) affordability, and 6) marketing and promotions. The perceived obesogenic environment, adverse health effects, and disadvantaged socioeconomic context in which individuals live mutually reinforce each other. Social and physical isolation emerged as important cross-cutting mechanisms, interacting with financial constraints, limited mobility, inadequate facilities, non-inclusive activities and restricted access to information. Conclusion: Participatory GMB and the resulting CLD provide a locally grounded basis for developing actions to promote healthy eating and walking among adults in socioeconomically disadvantaged situations. Actions addressing several subsystems simultaneously, while minimizing the effort required from residents to benefit from them, may be particularly valuable. Further co-design, feasibility assessment and sustained collaboration between residents, local stakeholders and decision-makers are needed to translate these findings into equitable local action.
Related
- Understanding wellbeing together with children from migrant backgrounds living in socio-economically disadvantaged neighborhoods- A participatory photovoice study
- Visual Acuity Outcomes in Socioeconomically Disadvantaged Patients With Vitreous Hemorrhage Resulting From Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy Treated at a County Hospital
- Metabolic syndrome before 16 weeks' gestation: prevalence and haemodynamic profile in a socioeconomically disadvantaged pregnancy cohort: baseline findings from Mother's Heart Study.
- Bridging gaps in perinatal mental health services for socioeconomically disadvantaged women.
- Malaria in an informal settlement of a socioeconomically disadvantaged population in Rajasthan, a non-endemic state of India, 2024: an epidemiological investigation.
BibTeX
@article{dhooghe2026understanding,
title = {{Understanding the complex systems driving the perceived obesogenic environment among adults in socioeconomically disadvantaged situations: Findings from a participatory Group Model Building process in Flanders}},
author = {Suzannah D’Hooghe and Yasemin Inaç and Sarah Dury and Benedicte Deforche and Karin De Ridder and Stefanie Vandevijvere and Delfien Van Dyck and Nico Van de Weghe and Leonor Guariguata},
journal = {PLOS One},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.1371/journal.pone.0346991},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0346991},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Understanding the complex systems driving the perceived obesogenic environment among adults in socioeconomically disadvantaged situations: Findings from a participatory Group Model Building process in Flanders
AU - Suzannah D’Hooghe
AU - Yasemin Inaç
AU - Sarah Dury
AU - Benedicte Deforche
AU - Karin De Ridder
AU - Stefanie Vandevijvere
AU - Delfien Van Dyck
AU - Nico Van de Weghe
AU - Leonor Guariguata
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/05
JO - PLOS One
DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0346991
UR - https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0346991
AB - Introduction: Persons in socioeconomically disadvantaged situations are disproportionally exposed to obesogenic environments and often have fewer resources to counteract their influence, resulting in poorer dietary outcomes and lower levels of physical activity. This study aimed to map the complex systems within the municipal obesogenic environment driving unhealthy eating behaviors and insufficient walking among adults in socioeconomically disadvantaged situations in Flanders, and to identify potential actions for local policymakers. Methods: Participatory group model building (GMB), a qualitative system dynamics method, was used to engage adults in socioeconomically disadvantaged situations (n = 7), local decision makers (n = 7) and local non-government stakeholders (n = 7) in two peri-urban Flemish municipalities. Two GMB sessions over two days were held in each municipality during which a causal loop diagram (CLD) was created and potential actions were identified for local policymakers by considering causal pathways and reinforcing loops in the system. Results: The CLD represents participants’ perceptions of how the local obesogenic environment contributes to unhealthy eating and insufficient walking among adults in socioeconomically disadvantaged situations. Six interconnected subsystems were identified: 1) social context, 2) facilities and activities, 3) mobility options, 4) information, 5) affordability, and 6) marketing and promotions. The perceived obesogenic environment, adverse health effects, and disadvantaged socioeconomic context in which individuals live mutually reinforce each other. Social and physical isolation emerged as important cross-cutting mechanisms, interacting with financial constraints, limited mobility, inadequate facilities, non-inclusive activities and restricted access to information. Conclusion: Participatory GMB and the resulting CLD provide a locally grounded basis for developing actions to promote healthy eating and walking among adults in socioeconomically disadvantaged situations. Actions addressing several subsystems simultaneously, while minimizing the effort required from residents to benefit from them, may be particularly valuable. Further co-design, feasibility assessment and sustained collaboration between residents, local stakeholders and decision-makers are needed to translate these findings into equitable local action.
SN - 1932-6203
ER -