Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 13 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BYFrontiers in global women's health

Bridging gaps in perinatal mental health services for socioeconomically disadvantaged women.

  1. 1Population Health Science Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, United Kingdom.
  2. 2Division of Health Research, Faculty of Health & Medicine, Lancaster University, Lancaster, United Kingdom.
  3. 3IDEAS-NET, Northumbria University, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, United Kingdom.

Abstract

Introduction

Perinatal mental health (PMH) is a critical aspect of maternal and child wellbeing, yet many women, particularly those from socioeconomically disadvantaged backgrounds, face significant barriers in accessing timely and appropriate support. While national policies have aimed to improve PMH services, disparities in awareness, accessibility, and engagement persist. This study explored the challenges and facilitators to PMH service access in the North East and North Cumbria (NENC) region in England, with a focus on identifying actions to improve accessibility.Methods

A two-phase qualitative study was conducted with 43 participants. Phase 1 involved semi-structured interviews with service providers from healthcare, voluntary, and community sectors who support women experiencing socioeconomic disadvantage (n = 23). Phase 2 comprised interviews with women from diverse, socioeconomically disadvantaged backgrounds who had experienced PMH challenges (n = 20). Data were analysed thematically and subsequently mapped to Levesque's conceptual framework of healthcare access, to examine individual and system-level factors influencing access to and engagement with PMH services.Results

Findings highlight multiple barriers to accessing PMH care, including the lack of routine mental health discussions in antenatal care, limited visibility of services, cultural stigma, and structural challenges such as service fragmentation and system distrust. Women from disadvantaged backgrounds often faced additional barriers due to digital exclusion, language difficulties, and lack of childcare. Participants identified six key actions to improve access: embedding PMH discussions into routine maternity care, enhancing service visibility through targeted outreach, expanding flexible service models, strengthening cultural competence, building trust through community-based models, and improving coordination and referral pathways between PMH support and existing healthcare and social services.Discussion

Addressing barriers to PMH access requires a multi-level approach that prioritises proactive service integration, workforce capacity building, and community-led engagement strategies. Strengthening service coordination and ensuring culturally responsive and flexible care models are critical steps toward improving equity in PMH support.

Related

  1. Visual Acuity Outcomes in Socioeconomically Disadvantaged Patients With Vitreous Hemorrhage Resulting From Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy Treated at a County Hospital
    Lucas W. Rowe, David A. Camp, Kartik Gannamaneni +2
    Journal of Vitreoretinal DiseasesPeer-reviewedLicence not statedFull text1 citedGeneral medicinePMC
  2. Metabolic syndrome before 16 weeks' gestation: prevalence and haemodynamic profile in a socioeconomically disadvantaged pregnancy cohort: baseline findings from Mother's Heart Study.
    A Mohebi, M Arstall, J Dalton +6
    EndocrinePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textEndocrinology & metabolismEurope PMC
  3. Understanding the complex systems driving the perceived obesogenic environment among adults in socioeconomically disadvantaged situations: Findings from a participatory Group Model Building process in Flanders
    Suzannah D’Hooghe, Yasemin Inaç, Sarah Dury +6
    PLOS OnePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textEpidemiology & public healthNutritionPLOS
  4. Malaria in an informal settlement of a socioeconomically disadvantaged population in Rajasthan, a non-endemic state of India, 2024: an epidemiological investigation.
    Pankaj Kumar Taylor, Ramkesh Choudhary, Srividya K Vedachalam +5
    Malaria journalPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textEpidemiology & public healthEurope PMCPMC
  5. Mixed-methods evaluation of a rights-based intervention to reduce long-term segregation in mental health services: the HOPE(S) National Programme in England.
    Alina Haines-Delmont, Kathryn Fradley, Dineesha Georgeena Rajan +1
    BMJ openPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textPsychiatry & mental healthEurope PMCCrossref
BibTeX
@article{udeozor2026bridging,
  title = {{Bridging gaps in perinatal mental health services for socioeconomically disadvantaged women.}},
  author = {Lem Ngongalah Udeozor and Catherine El-Zerbi and Josephine Wildman and Malcolm Moffat and Judith Rankin},
  journal = {Frontiers in global women's health},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.3389/fgwh.2026.1850520},
  url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42846155},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Bridging gaps in perinatal mental health services for socioeconomically disadvantaged women.
AU  - Lem Ngongalah Udeozor
AU  - Catherine El-Zerbi
AU  - Josephine Wildman
AU  - Malcolm Moffat
AU  - Judith Rankin
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/23
JO  - Frontiers in global women's health
DO  - 10.3389/fgwh.2026.1850520
UR  - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42846155
AB  - Introduction  Perinatal mental health (PMH) is a critical aspect of maternal and child wellbeing, yet many women, particularly those from socioeconomically disadvantaged backgrounds, face significant barriers in accessing timely and appropriate support. While national policies have aimed to improve PMH services, disparities in awareness, accessibility, and engagement persist. This study explored the challenges and facilitators to PMH service access in the North East and North Cumbria (NENC) region in England, with a focus on identifying actions to improve accessibility.Methods  A two-phase qualitative study was conducted with 43 participants. Phase 1 involved semi-structured interviews with service providers from healthcare, voluntary, and community sectors who support women experiencing socioeconomic disadvantage (n = 23). Phase 2 comprised interviews with women from diverse, socioeconomically disadvantaged backgrounds who had experienced PMH challenges (n = 20). Data were analysed thematically and subsequently mapped to Levesque's conceptual framework of healthcare access, to examine individual and system-level factors influencing access to and engagement with PMH services.Results  Findings highlight multiple barriers to accessing PMH care, including the lack of routine mental health discussions in antenatal care, limited visibility of services, cultural stigma, and structural challenges such as service fragmentation and system distrust. Women from disadvantaged backgrounds often faced additional barriers due to digital exclusion, language difficulties, and lack of childcare. Participants identified six key actions to improve access: embedding PMH discussions into routine maternity care, enhancing service visibility through targeted outreach, expanding flexible service models, strengthening cultural competence, building trust through community-based models, and improving coordination and referral pathways between PMH support and existing healthcare and social services.Discussion  Addressing barriers to PMH access requires a multi-level approach that prioritises proactive service integration, workforce capacity building, and community-led engagement strategies. Strengthening service coordination and ensuring culturally responsive and flexible care models are critical steps toward improving equity in PMH support.
SN  - 2673-5059
ER  -