Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,688 studies31 sourcesUpdated 37 min ago
PreprintCC BYmedRxiv

Effectiveness of Kalevala Manual Therapy, Health Coaching, and Physiotherapy for Chronic Low Back Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial (The INTEGRA Trial)

  1. 1School of Medicine, Institute of Biomedicine, Sports and Exercise Medicine, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.

Abstract

Background and aimLow back pain is the leading cause of years lived with disability (YLDs) globally. While physiotherapy (PT) is recommended as a first-line treatment, evidence regarding Kalevala Manual Therapy (KMT) remains limited. This study compared the effects of physiotherapy, KMT, and KMT combined with health coaching (KMT+HC) on pain, disability, and psychosocial outcomes in individuals with CLBP.

Experimental procedureIn this single-center, three-arm, parallel-group trial, 81 adults with non-specific CLBP (symptoms [≥] 12 weeks, STarT Back score > 3) were randomized (1:1:1) to receive PT (n = 27), KMT (n = 27), or KMT+HC (n = 27) over an 8-week intervention period. Primary outcomes were functional disability (Oswestry Disability Index, ODI) and pain intensity (Numeric Rating Scale, NRS). Secondary outcomes included work- and physical activity-related fear-avoidance beliefs (FABQ-W, FABQ-PA), depressive symptoms (BDI), quality of life (RAND-36), and patient-specific functional status (PSFS). Longitudinal changes were analyzed using linear mixed models.

ResultsStatistically significant and generally clinically meaningful improvements over time were observed across the intervention groups for both ODI and NRS (both p < 0.001), with no significant between-group differences in the primary outcomes. No significant between-group differences were identified for the primary outcomes. A significant group-by-time interaction was observed for work-related fear-avoidance beliefs (FABQ-W; p = 0.005). Post hoc analyses revealed that KMT+HC achieved a significantly greater reduction in FABQ-W scores than PT (p = 0.002), with only the KMT+HC group exceeding the established minimal clinically important difference (MCID) threshold. Overall treatment satisfaction was high, with a mean score of at least 6.2 out of 7 and 100% protocol adherence were observed across all arms without any reported adverse events.

ConclusionKMT and KMT combined with health coaching produced improvements in pain and functional disability comparable to guideline-based physiotherapy. Furthermore, the addition of structured health coaching to KMT significantly reduced work-related fear-avoidance beliefs, demonstrating the value of integrating behavioral support into manual therapy for comprehensive CLBP rehabilitation.

Related

  1. Effectiveness of dose-matched immersive virtual reality-stationary cycling combined with neurological physiotherapy versus neurological physiotherapy alone in individuals with chronic stroke (CIVIS): A single-blind, randomized crossover trial protocol
    Daniel Asensio-Perez, David Lucena-Anton, Jose A. Moral-Munoz
    PLOS OnePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0NeurologyPhysiologyPLOS
  2. Percussive Vibration Therapy as an Adjunct to Conventional Physiotherapy in Chronic Non-Specific Low Back Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Elif Esma Bayraktar, Ömer Şevgin, Ainaz Vahedi +1
    Journal of clinical medicinePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textPharmacology & toxicologyEurope PMCCrossref
  3. The POSH-Ex Study: Study Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial of a 12-Week Online Physiotherapy Intervention for Improving Postpartum Sexual Health.
    Nikolina Zaplatić Degač, Ivana Živoder, Špela Bogataj
    Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland)Peer-reviewedCC BYFull textPsychiatry & mental healthEurope PMC
  4. Job Coaching and Smartphone-Based Cognitive Behavioral Techniques for Returning to Work and Coping With Unemployment (DRIVEN): Randomized Controlled Trial.
    James W Griffith, Allison M Letkiewicz, Mystie L Saturday +5
    Journal of medical Internet researchPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textEpidemiology & public healthEurope PMCPMC
  5. Clinician-curated ChatGPT-4o– and DeepSeek-R1–assisted exercise programmes added to standard physiotherapy for subacromial pain syndrome: a triple-masked randomized controlled trial
    Ömer Alperen Gürses, Selin Özmut, Elife Ceyda Okumuş +12
    Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textSurgery & anaesthesiaDOAJ
BibTeX
@misc{venojarvi2026effectiveness,
  title = {{Effectiveness of Kalevala Manual Therapy, Health Coaching, and Physiotherapy for Chronic Low Back Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial (The INTEGRA Trial)}},
  author = {M. Venojarvi and S. Mattila- Rautiainen and M. Partinen and T. Finsjo and P. Puska and M. Nenonen},
  howpublished = {medRxiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.64898/2026.10.13.26364897},
  url = {https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.10.13.26364897v1},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Effectiveness of Kalevala Manual Therapy, Health Coaching, and Physiotherapy for Chronic Low Back Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial (The INTEGRA Trial)
AU  - M. Venojarvi
AU  - S. Mattila- Rautiainen
AU  - M. Partinen
AU  - T. Finsjo
AU  - P. Puska
AU  - M. Nenonen
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/13
PB  - medRxiv
DO  - 10.64898/2026.10.13.26364897
UR  - https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.10.13.26364897v1
AB  - Background and aimLow back pain is the leading cause of years lived with disability (YLDs) globally. While physiotherapy (PT) is recommended as a first-line treatment, evidence regarding Kalevala Manual Therapy (KMT) remains limited. This study compared the effects of physiotherapy, KMT, and KMT combined with health coaching (KMT+HC) on pain, disability, and psychosocial outcomes in individuals with CLBP.  Experimental procedureIn this single-center, three-arm, parallel-group trial, 81 adults with non-specific CLBP (symptoms [≥] 12 weeks, STarT Back score > 3) were randomized (1:1:1) to receive PT (n = 27), KMT (n = 27), or KMT+HC (n = 27) over an 8-week intervention period. Primary outcomes were functional disability (Oswestry Disability Index, ODI) and pain intensity (Numeric Rating Scale, NRS). Secondary outcomes included work- and physical activity-related fear-avoidance beliefs (FABQ-W, FABQ-PA), depressive symptoms (BDI), quality of life (RAND-36), and patient-specific functional status (PSFS). Longitudinal changes were analyzed using linear mixed models.  ResultsStatistically significant and generally clinically meaningful improvements over time were observed across the intervention groups for both ODI and NRS (both p < 0.001), with no significant between-group differences in the primary outcomes. No significant between-group differences were identified for the primary outcomes. A significant group-by-time interaction was observed for work-related fear-avoidance beliefs (FABQ-W; p = 0.005). Post hoc analyses revealed that KMT+HC achieved a significantly greater reduction in FABQ-W scores than PT (p = 0.002), with only the KMT+HC group exceeding the established minimal clinically important difference (MCID) threshold. Overall treatment satisfaction was high, with a mean score of at least 6.2 out of 7 and 100% protocol adherence were observed across all arms without any reported adverse events.  ConclusionKMT and KMT combined with health coaching produced improvements in pain and functional disability comparable to guideline-based physiotherapy. Furthermore, the addition of structured health coaching to KMT significantly reduced work-related fear-avoidance beliefs, demonstrating the value of integrating behavioral support into manual therapy for comprehensive CLBP rehabilitation.
ER  -