Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 44 min ago
PreprintCC BY 4.0arXiv

Causal Retention in Interactive Agents: Interface Factorization and Selective Adaptation

Abstract

Task performance need not determine which intervention mechanism an agent retains. We study causal retention: whether a frozen learned state answers a mechanism-probe map fixed independently of training, including action, context, direct target, value, and delay. For finite structural causal model classes, the optimal probe error is a Bayes decision risk. It vanishes exactly when every learning-interface fiber lies within one probe-answer fiber; any state obtained by post-processing that interface inherits the same lower bound. A posterior-coverage theorem characterizes budgeted retesting, while an exact edit decomposition shows that the shifted set is the unique support of an error-free target update. Causal Core implements these conditions through evidence-gated writing, readout filtering, temporal credit, hidden-context setup, and local diagnostic updates. Experiments cover finite causal systems, continuous simulators, an official TD-MPC2 world model, and Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct. A frozen Qwen last-layer probe reaches 0.958 balanced accuracy on source mechanisms but 0.583 on changed delays; the gated mechanism state reaches 1.000 and accepts only 0.056 of synchronized-readout candidates. In TD-MPC2, five target states per actuator recover effect-sign accuracy from 0.057 to 0.948 without degrading stable responses. Causal retention is therefore distinct from task sufficiency and source-domain decodability.

Related

  1. ParetoChat: An LLM-Based Interface for Interactive Multi-Objective Optimization
    Gokhan Ceyhan
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textOptimisation & controlarXiv
  2. Certified Behavioral Retention for Continual Adaptation with Held-Out Anchors
    Ahanaf Hasan Ariq, Abrar Shahid
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textStatisticsarXiv
  3. A Domain-specific adaptation network for elliptic interface problems
    Jiaqi Luo, Hongmei Kang, Xingye Yue +1
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textNumerical analysis & scientific computingarXiv
  4. Sharp Probabilistic Normwise Backward Error Bounds for LU Factorization
    Liam Burke, El-Mehdi El Arar, Stef Graillat +1
    HALPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textNumerical analysis & scientific computingProbabilityHAL
  5. A Categorical Realization of the (2-)Category of Monoids via Sch{ü}tzenberger Categories and Strict Factorization Systems
    Xavier Mary
    CompositionalityPeer-reviewedLicence not statedGeneral mathematicsHAL
BibTeX
@misc{zhang2026causal,
  title = {{Causal Retention in Interactive Agents: Interface Factorization and Selective Adaptation}},
  author = {Shengjun Zhang and Tingyi Liu and Dong Xie and Yunlong Dong and Xiang Wang and Cheng Zeng},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2609.30650},
  eprint = {2609.30650},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.30650},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Causal Retention in Interactive Agents: Interface Factorization and Selective Adaptation
AU  - Shengjun Zhang
AU  - Tingyi Liu
AU  - Dong Xie
AU  - Yunlong Dong
AU  - Xiang Wang
AU  - Cheng Zeng
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/25
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2609.30650
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.30650
AB  - Task performance need not determine which intervention mechanism an agent retains. We study causal retention: whether a frozen learned state answers a mechanism-probe map fixed independently of training, including action, context, direct target, value, and delay. For finite structural causal model classes, the optimal probe error is a Bayes decision risk. It vanishes exactly when every learning-interface fiber lies within one probe-answer fiber; any state obtained by post-processing that interface inherits the same lower bound. A posterior-coverage theorem characterizes budgeted retesting, while an exact edit decomposition shows that the shifted set is the unique support of an error-free target update. Causal Core implements these conditions through evidence-gated writing, readout filtering, temporal credit, hidden-context setup, and local diagnostic updates. Experiments cover finite causal systems, continuous simulators, an official TD-MPC2 world model, and Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct. A frozen Qwen last-layer probe reaches 0.958 balanced accuracy on source mechanisms but 0.583 on changed delays; the gated mechanism state reaches 1.000 and accepts only 0.056 of synchronized-readout candidates. In TD-MPC2, five target states per actuator recover effect-sign accuracy from 0.057 to 0.948 without degrading stable responses. Causal retention is therefore distinct from task sufficiency and source-domain decodability.
ER  -