Antibiotics in wastewater and removal efficiency of treatment plants: A systematic review
5 affiliations
- 1LAR5 Laboratory, Dipartimento di Ingegneria, University of Perugia, Via G. Duranti 93, 06125, Perugia, Italy. Electronic address: [email protected]
- 2Department of Environmental Sciences, Informatics and Statistics (DAIS), Ca' Foscari University of Venice, Venice, Italy
- 3R & D Biologicals, JU Agri Sciences Pvt. Ltd., Industrial Area, Sikandrabad, Bulandshahr, Uttar Pradesh, 203205, India
- 4School of Bioengineering and Food Technology, Faculty of Applied Sciences and Biotechnology, Shoolini University, Solan, Himachal Pradesh, 173229, India
- 5LAR5 Laboratory, Dipartimento di Ingegneria, University of Perugia, Via G. Duranti 93, 06125, Perugia, Italy. Electronic address: [email protected]
Abstract
The environmental spreading of antibiotics, antibiotic-resistant bacteria, and antibiotic resistance genes, along with a plethora of other chemical compounds via wastewater systems, represents a critical interface between human activity and aquatic ecosystems. Wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) have been identified by the latest EU directive 2024/3019 as points of primary control for limiting these emissions; however, conventional WWTPs, substantially designed for organic matter and nutrient removal, are often not able to remove such chemicals. As a result, treated effluents and sewage sludge may act as continuous sources of selective pressure for antimicrobial resistance in receiving environments. This systematic review critically evaluates the performance of advanced treatment technologies and monitoring strategies applied in wastewater systems for the removal of antibiotics and identifies research gaps while proposing recommendations for optimizing treatment processes and monitoring frameworks. Peer-reviewed studies published between January 2015 and March 2025 were retrieved from PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus and screened following PRISMA 2020; 28 studies were included after eligibility assessment. Conventional biological treatment achieved only partial and variable antibiotic removal, with macrolides, fluoroquinolones, and sulfonamides frequently persisting in effluents at environmentally relevant levels. Advanced and quaternary treatments generally showed higher efficiencies, often >90%, though performance was compound- and process-dependent. The occurrence of transformation products and the presence of antibiotics in sewage sludge indicate additional exposure pathways, while heterogeneous monitoring approaches limited cross-study comparability. Overall, the evidence indicates that conventional WWTPs act as incomplete barriers to antibiotic release, supporting the need for optimized advanced treatment implementation, harmonized monitoring, and integrated management strategies.
Related
- Assessment of viral pathogen removal across wastewater treatment stages in a swine processing facility
- Adsorptive removal of benzo(ghi)perylene from vehicle-wash wastewater using eucalyptus wood waste-derived biochar
- Bioinspired hierarchical electrospun TiO2/BiOI nanofibers for multifunctional photocatalytic PMS activation: Antibiotics and microplastics removal
- Design of a magnetically retrievable pectin-embedded MXene-Santa Barbara amorphous-15 network for high-performance removal of two β-lactam antibiotics from aqueous media.
- In-situ enhancement of autotrophic nitrogen removal in coking wastewater using staged diatomite and pyrite strategy
BibTeX
@article{sarvestani2026antibiotics,
title = {{Antibiotics in wastewater and removal efficiency of treatment plants: A systematic review}},
author = {Maryam Ebrahimzadeh Sarvestani and Tiziano Bonato and Ankur J. Phillips and Tarun Pal and Francesco Di Maria},
journal = {The Science of The Total Environment},
year = {2026},
month = may,
doi = {10.1016/j.scitotenv.2026.181868},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2026.181868},
note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Antibiotics in wastewater and removal efficiency of treatment plants: A systematic review
AU - Maryam Ebrahimzadeh Sarvestani
AU - Tiziano Bonato
AU - Ankur J. Phillips
AU - Tarun Pal
AU - Francesco Di Maria
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/05/14
JO - The Science of The Total Environment
DO - 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2026.181868
UR - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2026.181868
AB - The environmental spreading of antibiotics, antibiotic-resistant bacteria, and antibiotic resistance genes, along with a plethora of other chemical compounds via wastewater systems, represents a critical interface between human activity and aquatic ecosystems. Wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) have been identified by the latest EU directive 2024/3019 as points of primary control for limiting these emissions; however, conventional WWTPs, substantially designed for organic matter and nutrient removal, are often not able to remove such chemicals. As a result, treated effluents and sewage sludge may act as continuous sources of selective pressure for antimicrobial resistance in receiving environments. This systematic review critically evaluates the performance of advanced treatment technologies and monitoring strategies applied in wastewater systems for the removal of antibiotics and identifies research gaps while proposing recommendations for optimizing treatment processes and monitoring frameworks. Peer-reviewed studies published between January 2015 and March 2025 were retrieved from PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus and screened following PRISMA 2020; 28 studies were included after eligibility assessment. Conventional biological treatment achieved only partial and variable antibiotic removal, with macrolides, fluoroquinolones, and sulfonamides frequently persisting in effluents at environmentally relevant levels. Advanced and quaternary treatments generally showed higher efficiencies, often >90%, though performance was compound- and process-dependent. The occurrence of transformation products and the presence of antibiotics in sewage sludge indicate additional exposure pathways, while heterogeneous monitoring approaches limited cross-study comparability. Overall, the evidence indicates that conventional WWTPs act as incomplete barriers to antibiotic release, supporting the need for optimized advanced treatment implementation, harmonized monitoring, and integrated management strategies.
SN - 0048-9697
SN - 1879-1026
ER -