Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,203 studies31 sourcesUpdated 38 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Australian Veterinary Journal

Assessment of viral pathogen removal across wastewater treatment stages in a swine processing facility

  1. 1CSIRO Environment, Ecosciences Precinct Dutton Park Queensland Australia
  2. 2SunPork Group Brisbane Queensland Australia

Abstract

A swine abattoir wastewater treatment system in Queensland, Australia, was monitored over 6 months to assess the effectiveness of a pond‐based treatment system for the removal of viruses prior to irrigation reuse. Four viruses were tracked through the facility, from points of entry to the final treated effluent, to identify major sources of viral contamination and quantify viral reductions across treatment stages. The truck wash contributed the highest viral loads overall, reflecting the accumulation of porcine faecal materials on transport vehicles and its release during washing. Substantial viral loads were also detected from the lairage area and slaughter floor, consistent with direct contact with live animals and carcase processing. In contrast, the boning room contributed the lowest viral loads among sampled locations. These findings identified priority locations for targeted hygiene interventions and drainage management. The three‐pond system achieved substantial viral reductions, with concentrations decreasing consistently through the anaerobic, aerobic and storage ponds. By the final pond, viral concentrations were generally at or below detection limits. Overall reductions ranged from approximately 90%–99.9%, depending on virus type. Soil samples collected from irrigated areas tested negative for all viruses, consistent with non‐detectable levels in the applied effluent, indicating no measurable viral presence in the soil following land application under the conditions studied. Viability‐based quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) and reverse transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT‐qPCR) assays demonstrated that most detectable viral genomes in treated wastewater originated from non‐intact, likely non‐infectious particles. Intact viral particles were rarely detected following final treatment, even when viral genomes remained measurable, suggesting that conventional qPCR/RT‐qPCR quantification alone may overestimate the presence of infectious viruses in treated effluent. Overall, the pond‐based treatment system provided effective viral removal prior to irrigation reuse. Maintaining adequate retention times is recommended to sustain treatment performance and ensuring the safety of irrigation reuse. Strategic management of truck wash effluent was identified as an opportunity for further viral load reduction.

Related

  1. Hydrodynamic and electrochemical assessment of a compact continuous-flow electrocoagulation reactor for decentralized household wastewater treatment
    Hoang Anh Tuan, Le Huynh Duc, Nguyen Tuong Vi +2
    Desalination and Water TreatmentPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textHydrology & soilsDOAJ
  2. Green biosynthesis of multifunctional copper oxide nanoparticles using a leaf extract for potential applications: process optimization, wastewater treatment, phytotoxicity assessment, and antioxidant activity
    Abdelkader Dabagh, Fatima Zahra Erraji, Guellaa Mahmoudy +6
    Applied Surface Science AdvancesPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND9 citedHydrology & soilsOpenAlex
  3. From Outpatient Consumption to Receiving Waters: A Retrospective Screening Assessment of Antibiotic Loads, Resistance Indicators, and Implications for the Recast Urban Wastewater Treatment Directive.
    Aneta Łuczkiewicz, Wojciech Artichowicz, Małgorzata Szopińska +6
    Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland)Peer-reviewedCC BYFull textEnvironmental science & pollutionEurope PMC
  4. Global Harmonization of Life Cycle Assessments for Small- and Medium-Scale Wastewater Treatment
    Emilio Solis, Nils Thonemann, Ranran Wang +2
    ACS ES&T waterPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textEnvironmental science & pollutionEurope PMC
  5. Sustainable Chemical Approaches for Wastewater Treatment and Resource Utilization
    Jingtao Bi
    MoleculesPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Environmental science & pollutionCrossref
BibTeX
@article{ahmed2026assessment,
  title = {{Assessment of viral pathogen removal across wastewater treatment stages in a swine processing facility}},
  author = {W Ahmed and M Gebrewold and WJM Smith and K Richards and SL Simpson},
  journal = {Australian Veterinary Journal},
  year = {2026},
  month = jul,
  doi = {10.1111/avj.70121},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1111/avj.70121},
  note = {CC BY-NC-ND 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Assessment of viral pathogen removal across wastewater treatment stages in a swine processing facility
AU  - W Ahmed
AU  - M Gebrewold
AU  - WJM Smith
AU  - K Richards
AU  - SL Simpson
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/07/28
JO  - Australian Veterinary Journal
DO  - 10.1111/avj.70121
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1111/avj.70121
AB  - A swine abattoir wastewater treatment system in Queensland, Australia, was monitored over 6 months to assess the effectiveness of a pond‐based treatment system for the removal of viruses prior to irrigation reuse. Four viruses were tracked through the facility, from points of entry to the final treated effluent, to identify major sources of viral contamination and quantify viral reductions across treatment stages. The truck wash contributed the highest viral loads overall, reflecting the accumulation of porcine faecal materials on transport vehicles and its release during washing. Substantial viral loads were also detected from the lairage area and slaughter floor, consistent with direct contact with live animals and carcase processing. In contrast, the boning room contributed the lowest viral loads among sampled locations. These findings identified priority locations for targeted hygiene interventions and drainage management. The three‐pond system achieved substantial viral reductions, with concentrations decreasing consistently through the anaerobic, aerobic and storage ponds. By the final pond, viral concentrations were generally at or below detection limits. Overall reductions ranged from approximately 90%–99.9%, depending on virus type. Soil samples collected from irrigated areas tested negative for all viruses, consistent with non‐detectable levels in the applied effluent, indicating no measurable viral presence in the soil following land application under the conditions studied. Viability‐based quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) and reverse transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT‐qPCR) assays demonstrated that most detectable viral genomes in treated wastewater originated from non‐intact, likely non‐infectious particles. Intact viral particles were rarely detected following final treatment, even when viral genomes remained measurable, suggesting that conventional qPCR/RT‐qPCR quantification alone may overestimate the presence of infectious viruses in treated effluent. Overall, the pond‐based treatment system provided effective viral removal prior to irrigation reuse. Maintaining adequate retention times is recommended to sustain treatment performance and ensuring the safety of irrigation reuse. Strategic management of truck wash effluent was identified as an opportunity for further viral load reduction.
SN  - 0005-0423
SN  - 1751-0813
ER  -