Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,203 studies31 sourcesUpdated 26 min ago
PreprintCC BYbioRxiv

The cytokine structural homologs IL-1β and IL-1Ra have distinct dynamical character that potentially influence their roles in allosteric regulation of the IL-1 receptor.

  1. 1Texas AandM University

Abstract

Interleukin-1{beta} (IL-1{beta}) and the interleukin-1 receptor antagonist (IL-1Ra) share the {beta}-trefoil fold, engage the same receptor (IL-1R), but produce opposite biological outcomes. IL-1{beta} recruits the accessory protein IL-1RAcP to initiate inflammatory signaling while IL-1Ra occupies the receptor without supporting co-receptor recruitment. Seeking the origin of this divergence in properties not apparent from static structures, we used solution NMR relaxation to characterize fast internal motion in both proteins. Rigorous treatment of macromolecular tumbling shows both to be nearly maximally triaxial, which admits two near-degenerate axially symmetric solutions. This ambiguity was propagated throughout and found to have negligible impact. Complete replicate data sets from independently prepared IL-1{beta} samples establish the experimental precision directly. Backbone amide and methyl-bearing side chain order parameters are indistinguishable between the two proteins, the latter averaging 0.484 {+/-} 0.030 and 0.486 {+/-} 0.033, indicating essentially equivalent residual conformational entropy. Their spatial distributions are uncorrelated when projected onto the shared fold. Importantly, the difference between the proteins is concentrated at the receptor interface, where methyl probes lying on the IL-1{beta} footprint are considerably more mobile than those of IL-1Ra. It is therefore the agonist, not the antagonist, that presents an anomalously mobile binding surface. IL-1Ra also buries some 16% less surface while ostensibly binding IL-1R more tightly, the signature of an interface predisposed toward productive contact. Conformational entropy can thus distinguish protein function where structure and average flexibility are conserved, and the distinction resides not in how much entropy a protein has but in where it is kept.

Related

  1. Catalytic mechanism and allosteric regulation of an oligomeric (p)ppGpp synthetase by an alarmone.
    Steinchen W, Schuhmacher Js, Altegoer F +5
    Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of AmericaPeer-reviewedLicence not stated121 citedMolecular biology & gene regulationGeneral biologyHAL
  2. Mechanism of catalytic regulation by an allosteric hot spot in dihydrofolate reductase
    Paul Guénon, Marion Chauveau, Karolina Filipowska +6
    Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of AmericaPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full text1 citedMolecular biology & gene regulationPMC
  3. Regulation of a Classical Allosteric Molecular Machine by an Intrinsically Disordered Domain: the C-termini of GroEL
    M. E. Powers, K. A. Evans, H. Sun +2
    bioRxivPreprintCC BYFull textBiophysicsbioRxiv
  4. Mechanical regulation of LINC complex function: structural basis, physiological roles, and disease mechanisms in transnuclear mechanotransduction
    Shuoshuo Shao, Zhu Zhu, Huaiquan Liu
    Frontiers in cell and developmental biologyPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral biochemistryEurope PMC
  5. Fundamental dynamical units for physics-informed structural inference from perturbation time-series in networked systems
    Nima Nouri
    Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textMolecular biology & gene regulationCrossref
BibTeX
@misc{torresmontalvo2026cytokine,
  title = {{The cytokine structural homologs IL-1β and IL-1Ra have distinct dynamical character that potentially influence their roles in allosteric regulation of the IL-1 receptor.}},
  author = {G. Torres-Montalvo and T. Cole and A. C. Bishop and R. Lopes and A. J. Wand},
  howpublished = {bioRxiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.64898/2026.09.10.750673},
  url = {https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.09.10.750673v1},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - The cytokine structural homologs IL-1β and IL-1Ra have distinct dynamical character that potentially influence their roles in allosteric regulation of the IL-1 receptor.
AU  - G. Torres-Montalvo
AU  - T. Cole
AU  - A. C. Bishop
AU  - R. Lopes
AU  - A. J. Wand
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/10
PB  - bioRxiv
DO  - 10.64898/2026.09.10.750673
UR  - https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.09.10.750673v1
AB  - Interleukin-1{beta} (IL-1{beta}) and the interleukin-1 receptor antagonist (IL-1Ra) share the {beta}-trefoil fold, engage the same receptor (IL-1R), but produce opposite biological outcomes. IL-1{beta} recruits the accessory protein IL-1RAcP to initiate inflammatory signaling while IL-1Ra occupies the receptor without supporting co-receptor recruitment. Seeking the origin of this divergence in properties not apparent from static structures, we used solution NMR relaxation to characterize fast internal motion in both proteins. Rigorous treatment of macromolecular tumbling shows both to be nearly maximally triaxial, which admits two near-degenerate axially symmetric solutions. This ambiguity was propagated throughout and found to have negligible impact. Complete replicate data sets from independently prepared IL-1{beta} samples establish the experimental precision directly. Backbone amide and methyl-bearing side chain order parameters are indistinguishable between the two proteins, the latter averaging 0.484 {+/-} 0.030 and 0.486 {+/-} 0.033, indicating essentially equivalent residual conformational entropy. Their spatial distributions are uncorrelated when projected onto the shared fold. Importantly, the difference between the proteins is concentrated at the receptor interface, where methyl probes lying on the IL-1{beta} footprint are considerably more mobile than those of IL-1Ra. It is therefore the agonist, not the antagonist, that presents an anomalously mobile binding surface. IL-1Ra also buries some 16% less surface while ostensibly binding IL-1R more tightly, the signature of an interface predisposed toward productive contact. Conformational entropy can thus distinguish protein function where structure and average flexibility are conserved, and the distinction resides not in how much entropy a protein has but in where it is kept.
ER  -