Patient perspectives on virtual consultations for type 2 diabetes in the United Kingdom: use, associated factors, and perceived quality of care
- 1Department of Primary Care and Public Health, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
- 2Institute of Global Health Innovation (IGHI), Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Abstract
Introduction: Although virtual consultations (VCs) have become a routine component of type 2 diabetes (T2D) care, evidence regarding patient experiences remains limited. We investigated VC use among UK adults with T2D, factors associated with both current and intended use, and perceived quality of care.
Methods: A weighted national cross-sectional survey of 373 UK adults with self-reported T2D was conducted via the YouGov panel. The questionnaire included digital adoption factors based on the UTAUT2 framework, and perceived impacts of virtual consultations across IOM quality domains. Weighted logistic regression identified predictors of use and satisfaction.
Results: About one in three respondents (31.0%) had used virtual consultations, almost always by telephone (91.3%) and infrequently. After adjustment, younger age (18–44 vs. ≥65: OR 7.76, 95% CI 2.22–27.16) and a bachelor's undergraduate education (OR 2.05, 95% CI 1.06–3.96) were the only independent factors associated with use, and the same profile predicted intention to use. In the acceptance framework UTAUT2, effort expectancy and facilitating conditions were the strongest constructs and social influence the weakest. Across the full sample, efficiency was perceived as the quality domain most positively impacted by virtual consultations (62.4%), whereas patient-centredness was rated least favourably (34.5%). Perceived equity was also limited, with only 40.2% of respondents agreeing that different groups benefit equally from virtual consultations. Users rated the five parallel quality domains more positively than non-users anticipated; the equity item, asked of all respondents, did not differ significantly between groups.
Conclusion: Findings suggest that equitable and sustained uptake of virtual consultations requires attention to both digital inclusion and usability. Policies should support tailored interventions for populations at risk of exclusion, alongside investment in digital infrastructure and support resources. As perceived benefits vary across dimensions of care quality, virtual consultations are likely to be most effective when integrated within flexible hybrid models that align with patient preferences and care needs.
Related
- Type 2 Diabetes Self-Care in Family Life: A Qualitative Descriptive Study of Patient and Family Perspectives from Two Community Health Centers in Ogan Ilir Regency, South Sumatra, Indonesia.
- Psychosocial Factors Associated with Diabetes Distress Among Adults with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: The Roles of Perceived Social Support and Diabetes Management Self-Efficacy in an Indonesian Outpatient Sample.
- Case Report: Diabetic ketosis-associated hemichorea-hemiballism in an elderly patient with longstanding poorly controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus
- Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Associated with Diabetic Ketoacidosis in a Patient with Insulin-Dependent Diabetes: An Autopsy Case Report
- Perceived Multi-Level Diabetes Protective and Risk Factors Associated with Food and Dietary Acculturation Patterns Among East African Immigrants in the United States.
BibTeX
@article{aldakhil2026patient,
title = {{Patient perspectives on virtual consultations for type 2 diabetes in the United Kingdom: use, associated factors, and perceived quality of care}},
author = {Reham Aldakhil and Geva Greenfield and Albandari Alharbi and Ahmed Alboksmaty and Benedict Hayhoe and Azeem Majeed and Ana Luisa Neves},
journal = {Frontiers in Digital Health},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.3389/fdgth.2026.1921014},
url = {https://doi.org/10.3389/fdgth.2026.1921014},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Patient perspectives on virtual consultations for type 2 diabetes in the United Kingdom: use, associated factors, and perceived quality of care
AU - Reham Aldakhil
AU - Geva Greenfield
AU - Albandari Alharbi
AU - Ahmed Alboksmaty
AU - Benedict Hayhoe
AU - Azeem Majeed
AU - Ana Luisa Neves
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/12
JO - Frontiers in Digital Health
DO - 10.3389/fdgth.2026.1921014
UR - https://doi.org/10.3389/fdgth.2026.1921014
AB - Introduction: Although virtual consultations (VCs) have become a routine component of type 2 diabetes (T2D) care, evidence regarding patient experiences remains limited. We investigated VC use among UK adults with T2D, factors associated with both current and intended use, and perceived quality of care. Methods: A weighted national cross-sectional survey of 373 UK adults with self-reported T2D was conducted via the YouGov panel. The questionnaire included digital adoption factors based on the UTAUT2 framework, and perceived impacts of virtual consultations across IOM quality domains. Weighted logistic regression identified predictors of use and satisfaction. Results: About one in three respondents (31.0%) had used virtual consultations, almost always by telephone (91.3%) and infrequently. After adjustment, younger age (18–44 vs. ≥65: OR 7.76, 95% CI 2.22–27.16) and a bachelor's undergraduate education (OR 2.05, 95% CI 1.06–3.96) were the only independent factors associated with use, and the same profile predicted intention to use. In the acceptance framework UTAUT2, effort expectancy and facilitating conditions were the strongest constructs and social influence the weakest. Across the full sample, efficiency was perceived as the quality domain most positively impacted by virtual consultations (62.4%), whereas patient-centredness was rated least favourably (34.5%). Perceived equity was also limited, with only 40.2% of respondents agreeing that different groups benefit equally from virtual consultations. Users rated the five parallel quality domains more positively than non-users anticipated; the equity item, asked of all respondents, did not differ significantly between groups. Conclusion: Findings suggest that equitable and sustained uptake of virtual consultations requires attention to both digital inclusion and usability. Policies should support tailored interventions for populations at risk of exclusion, alongside investment in digital infrastructure and support resources. As perceived benefits vary across dimensions of care quality, virtual consultations are likely to be most effective when integrated within flexible hybrid models that align with patient preferences and care needs.
SN - 2673-253X
ER -