#KindnessbyPost: a pre-post, observational evaluation and feasibility study of a participatory public mental health intervention.
5 affiliations
- 1UCL Research Department of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, London, UK.
- 2Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK.
- 3School of Health in Social Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
- 4WHO Collaborating Centre for Arts and Health, Social Biobehavioural Research Group, University College London, London, UK.
- 5Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK. [email protected].
Abstract
Background
#KindnessbyPost (KbP) is a "national kindness exchange". Participants send and receive a card by post to different, unknown people containing messages of good will. Previous evidence suggests participation in KbP may reduce loneliness and improve wellbeing. We evaluated the outcomes and administrative costs of KbP and explored the feasibility of collecting health economic measures for future research.Methods
We used a pre-post, observational study design. Participants in two separate KbP exchanges in 2021 were invited to complete an online questionnaire. It included self-reported measures quantifying psychological wellbeing and loneliness, capability, and healthcare service use. Data were collected at three time-points per exchange: exchange-start (baseline), exchange-end (2 weeks), and 3 months post-exchange. Administrative cost data were obtained from the KbP programme organisers.Results
Across both exchanges, 1,285 responses were received from 1,142 participants. 143 participants completed questionnaires at both exchanges. In total, 623 (48%) participants completed follow-ups at exchange-end, and 414 (32%) at 3 months post-exchange. 70% (n = 789) of participants were aged between 31 and 60 years. 94% (n = 1,075) of participants were female and 95% (n = 1,078) were of white ethnicity. Compared to baseline, loneliness reduced and wellbeing increased at exchange end (change in loneliness = ‑0.21 units, 95% CI: -0.29 to -0.12; change in wellbeing = 0.68 units, 95% CI: 0.47 to 0.88, respectively) and at 3 months post-exchange (loneliness change = -0.40 units, 95% CI: -0.50 to -0.30; wellbeing change = 1.01 units, 95% CI: 0.77 to 1.25, respectively). Capability scores (mean (SD) were calculated at baseline: 0.74 (0.18); exchange-end: 0.75 (0.19); and 3 months: 0.76 (0.18)) from available responses. The average administrative cost of delivering the intervention was £0.67-£0.87 per participant, not including in-kind contributions.Conclusions
We observed a small, sustained improvement to people's wellbeing and loneliness following participation in a KbP exchange. Given the study design, causal attribution to KbP is uncertain. However, our results are consistent with previous evaluations and offer preliminary evidence that KbP may be an effective mental wellbeing intervention. Given its low administrative cost and highly scalable design, KbP could also be a cost-effective intervention for improving public mental health, warranting definitive evaluation of effectiveness and cost-effectiveness in future. Our study also demonstrated the feasibility of collecting wellbeing and health economic outcome measures needed for future research.
Related
- The implementation and evaluation of an advance care planning education intervention in a long-term care facility: a feasibility study.
- Feasibility and Operator-Reported Utility of Transesophageal Lung Ultrasound As an Adjunct to Resuscitative Transesophageal Echocardiography in the Evaluation of Shock: A Multicenter Observational Study
- Implementing the MATILDA intervention to enhance community participation for older adults with intellectual disability: A feasibility randomised controlled trial and RE-AIM guided process evaluation
- A mixed methods feasibility evaluation of a shared decision-making intervention for community dwelling adults living with dementia, family carers and practitioners
- Evaluation of a Contingency Management Intervention to Treat Substance Use Disorders in a Family Medicine Residency Program: A Retrospective Observational Review Study of Patient Outcomes and Experiences.
BibTeX
@article{novere2026kindnessbypost,
title = {{#KindnessbyPost: a pre-post, observational evaluation and feasibility study of a participatory public mental health intervention.}},
author = {Marie Le Novere and Caroline S Clarke and Rebecca Jones and Katey Warran and Brynmor Lloyd-Evans and Luke Sheridan Rains},
journal = {BMC public health},
year = {2026},
month = jul,
doi = {10.1186/s12889-026-28170-x},
url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42894147},
note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - #KindnessbyPost: a pre-post, observational evaluation and feasibility study of a participatory public mental health intervention.
AU - Marie Le Novere
AU - Caroline S Clarke
AU - Rebecca Jones
AU - Katey Warran
AU - Brynmor Lloyd-Evans
AU - Luke Sheridan Rains
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/07/01
JO - BMC public health
DO - 10.1186/s12889-026-28170-x
UR - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42894147
AB - Background #KindnessbyPost (KbP) is a "national kindness exchange". Participants send and receive a card by post to different, unknown people containing messages of good will. Previous evidence suggests participation in KbP may reduce loneliness and improve wellbeing. We evaluated the outcomes and administrative costs of KbP and explored the feasibility of collecting health economic measures for future research.Methods We used a pre-post, observational study design. Participants in two separate KbP exchanges in 2021 were invited to complete an online questionnaire. It included self-reported measures quantifying psychological wellbeing and loneliness, capability, and healthcare service use. Data were collected at three time-points per exchange: exchange-start (baseline), exchange-end (2 weeks), and 3 months post-exchange. Administrative cost data were obtained from the KbP programme organisers.Results Across both exchanges, 1,285 responses were received from 1,142 participants. 143 participants completed questionnaires at both exchanges. In total, 623 (48%) participants completed follow-ups at exchange-end, and 414 (32%) at 3 months post-exchange. 70% (n = 789) of participants were aged between 31 and 60 years. 94% (n = 1,075) of participants were female and 95% (n = 1,078) were of white ethnicity. Compared to baseline, loneliness reduced and wellbeing increased at exchange end (change in loneliness = ‑0.21 units, 95% CI: -0.29 to -0.12; change in wellbeing = 0.68 units, 95% CI: 0.47 to 0.88, respectively) and at 3 months post-exchange (loneliness change = -0.40 units, 95% CI: -0.50 to -0.30; wellbeing change = 1.01 units, 95% CI: 0.77 to 1.25, respectively). Capability scores (mean (SD) were calculated at baseline: 0.74 (0.18); exchange-end: 0.75 (0.19); and 3 months: 0.76 (0.18)) from available responses. The average administrative cost of delivering the intervention was £0.67-£0.87 per participant, not including in-kind contributions.Conclusions We observed a small, sustained improvement to people's wellbeing and loneliness following participation in a KbP exchange. Given the study design, causal attribution to KbP is uncertain. However, our results are consistent with previous evaluations and offer preliminary evidence that KbP may be an effective mental wellbeing intervention. Given its low administrative cost and highly scalable design, KbP could also be a cost-effective intervention for improving public mental health, warranting definitive evaluation of effectiveness and cost-effectiveness in future. Our study also demonstrated the feasibility of collecting wellbeing and health economic outcome measures needed for future research.
SN - 1471-2458
ER -