Radiation-Related Fear, Risk Perception, and Occupational Responses Among Healthcare Workers and Health Professions Students: A Scoping Review.
- 1Scientific Research Institute of Radiology Named After Academician Zh. H. Khamzabayev, Astana Medical University, Astana 010000, Kazakhstan.
- 2Department of Public Health, S. D. Asfendiyarov Kazakh National Medical University, Almaty 050012, Kazakhstan.
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Radiation-related fear, anxiety, risk perception, reproductive concern, protective behaviour, and avoidance are conceptually related but not interchangeable. This scoping review mapped how these constructs have been operationalised among healthcare workers and health professions students. Methods: Following JBI guidance and PRISMA-ScR, PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science Core Collection, and the Cochrane Library were searched for English-language records published from 1 January 2000 to 4 September 2026. Of 845 records, 388 duplicates were removed and 457 unique records were screened. Results: Twenty-seven reports underwent full-text assessment; one was excluded because its mixed population and radiation context did not permit a healthcare-specific occupational interpretation, leaving 26 studies. The evidence was dominated by cross-sectional studies and heterogeneous measurement instruments; therefore, study-level percentages were not treated as directly comparable prevalence estimates. Reported outcomes ranged from explicit radiophobia and affective anxiety to cognitive risk appraisal, reproductive concern, protective behaviour, and avoidance. Education was associated with differing changes across settings, while dosimetry, protective equipment, workflow, and safety climate were reported alongside occupational responses. Conclusions: The literature does not support a standardised operational definition or common measurement framework for professional radiophobia. Future research should distinguish affective fear or anxiety from contextually appropriate occupational risk appraisal and protective behaviour, and should evaluate organisational conditions alongside education.
Related
- Chemical risk perception among healthcare workers: formaldehyde exposure as a model for occupational prevention challenges
- Hematological Parameters and Occupational Ionizing Radiation Exposure in Interventional Healthcare Workers: A Longitudinal Matched Case-Control Study.
- Beyond the clicker: rethinking student response systems as pedagogical infrastructure for healthcare professions education
- Occupational ionizing radiation exposure among medical workers rose during the COVID-19 pandemic: a retrospective study
- Real-time occupational radiation dosimetry in anesthesiology personnel during fluoroscopy-guided interventions: a single-center descriptive and exploratory study
BibTeX
@article{almatova2026radiationrelated,
title = {{Radiation-Related Fear, Risk Perception, and Occupational Responses Among Healthcare Workers and Health Professions Students: A Scoping Review.}},
author = {Venera M Almatova and Zhanar Kozhakhmetova and Indira M Bozheyeva and Gaukhar L Medetova and Karlygash S Absattarova and Karlygash K Toguzbaeva},
journal = {Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland)},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.3390/healthcare14193353},
url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42881792},
note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Radiation-Related Fear, Risk Perception, and Occupational Responses Among Healthcare Workers and Health Professions Students: A Scoping Review.
AU - Venera M Almatova
AU - Zhanar Kozhakhmetova
AU - Indira M Bozheyeva
AU - Gaukhar L Medetova
AU - Karlygash S Absattarova
AU - Karlygash K Toguzbaeva
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/08
JO - Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland)
DO - 10.3390/healthcare14193353
UR - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42881792
AB - Background/Objectives: Radiation-related fear, anxiety, risk perception, reproductive concern, protective behaviour, and avoidance are conceptually related but not interchangeable. This scoping review mapped how these constructs have been operationalised among healthcare workers and health professions students. Methods: Following JBI guidance and PRISMA-ScR, PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science Core Collection, and the Cochrane Library were searched for English-language records published from 1 January 2000 to 4 September 2026. Of 845 records, 388 duplicates were removed and 457 unique records were screened. Results: Twenty-seven reports underwent full-text assessment; one was excluded because its mixed population and radiation context did not permit a healthcare-specific occupational interpretation, leaving 26 studies. The evidence was dominated by cross-sectional studies and heterogeneous measurement instruments; therefore, study-level percentages were not treated as directly comparable prevalence estimates. Reported outcomes ranged from explicit radiophobia and affective anxiety to cognitive risk appraisal, reproductive concern, protective behaviour, and avoidance. Education was associated with differing changes across settings, while dosimetry, protective equipment, workflow, and safety climate were reported alongside occupational responses. Conclusions: The literature does not support a standardised operational definition or common measurement framework for professional radiophobia. Future research should distinguish affective fear or anxiety from contextually appropriate occupational risk appraisal and protective behaviour, and should evaluate organisational conditions alongside education.
SN - 2227-9032
ER -