Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
190,860 studies31 sourcesUpdated 25 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Systematic Biology

Phylogenomics Illuminates the Evolutionary History of Wild Silkmoths in Space and Time (Lepidoptera: Saturniidae)

4 more authors
26 affiliations
  1. 1Institut de Systématique, Évolution, Biodiversité (ISYEB), Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle, CNRS, EPHE-PSL, Sorbonne Université, Université des Antilles , 45 rue Buffon, F-75005 Paris ,
  2. 2Institut de Systématique, Évolution, Biodiversité (ISYEB), Muséum national d'Histoire naturelle, CNRS, EPHE, Sorbonne Université, Université des Antilles, Paris, France ()
  3. 3Centre de Biologie pour la Gestion des Populations (CBGP), INRAE, CIRAD, IRD, Montpellier SupAgro, Université de Montpellier , 755 avenue du campus Agropolis CS 30016, F-34988 Montpellier ,
  4. 4Centre de Biologie pour la Gestion des Populations (CBGP), INRAE, CIRAD, IRD, Montpellier SupAgro, Université de Montpellier, Montpellier, France
  5. 5CESAB, Centre de Synthèse et d’Analyse sur la Biodiversité , 5 rue de l'École de médecine, F-34000 Montpellier ,
  6. 6CESAB, Centre de Synthèse et d'Analyse sur la Biodiversité, Montpellier, France
  7. 7Centre d’Écologie Fonctionnelle et Évolutive (CEFE), Université de Montpellier, CNRS, EPHE, IRD , 1919 route de Mende, F-34090 Montpellier ,
  8. 8Institut des Sciences de l'Évolution de Montpellier (ISEM), CNRS, Université de Montpellier, Montpellier, France
  9. 9Centre d'Écologie Fonctionnelle et Évolutive (CEFE), Université de Montpellier, CNRS, EPHE, IRD, Montpellier, France
  10. 10Molécules de Communication et Adaptation des Microorganismes (MCAM), Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle, CNRS , 61 rue Buffon, F-75005 Paris ,
  11. 11Service de Systématique Moléculaire, UAR 2700 DOHNEE, Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle , 57 rue Cuvier, F-75005 Paris ,
  12. 12Center for Biodiversity Genomics, University of Guelph , 50 Stone Road East, N1G2W1 Guelph, Ontario ,
  13. 13Molécules de Communication et Adaptation des Microorganismes (MCAM), Muséum national d'Histoire naturelle, CNRS, Paris, France
  14. 14Service de Systématique Moléculaire, UAR 2700 2AD, Muséum national d'Histoire naturelle, Paris, France
  15. 15Natural History Museum , Cromwell Road, South Kensington, London, SW7 5BD ,
  16. 16Center for Biodiversity Genomics, University of Guelph, Guelph, Canada
  17. 17Université Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, Université Savoie Mont Blanc, Laboratoire d’Écologie Alpine (LECA) , 2233 rue de la Piscine, F-38400 Saint Martin d'Heres ,
  18. 18Department of Life Sciences, Natural History Museum, London, United Kingdom
  19. 19INRAE, UR633, Zoologie Forestière , 2163 avenue de la pomme de pin, F-45075 Orléans ,
  20. 20Institut de Recherche sur la Biologie de l’Insecte, UMR7261 CNRS—Université de Tours , 20 Avenue Monge, Parc Grandmont, F-37200
  21. 21Université Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, Université Savoie Mont Blanc, Laboratoire d'Écologie Alpine (LECA), Grenoble, France
  22. 22Laboratoire Évolution et Diversité Biologique (EDB UMR5174), Université Toulouse 3 Paul Sabatier, CNRS, IRD , 118 Route de Narbonne, F-31062 Toulouse ,
  23. 23INRAE, UR633, Zoologie Forestière, F-45075 Orléans, France
  24. 24Institut de Recherche sur la Biologie de l'Insecte, UMR7261 CNRS - Université de Tours, France
  25. 25Laboratoire Évolution et Diversité Biologique (EDB UMR5174), Université Toulouse 3 Paul Sabatier, CNRS, IRD, Toulouse, France
  26. 26Institut des Sciences de l’Évolution de Montpellier (ISEM), CNRS, Université de Montpellier , Place Eugène Bataillon, F-34095 Montpellier ,

Abstract

Wild silkmoths (Saturniidae) are one of the most emblematic and well-studied families of moths. Yet, the absence of a robust phylogenetic framework based on a comprehensive taxonomic sampling impedes our understanding of their evolutionary history. We sequenced and analyzed 1024 ultraconserved elements (UCEs) and their flanking regions to infer the relationships among 338 species of Saturniidae representing all described subfamilies, tribes, and genera. We investigated systematic biases in genomic data and performed dating and historical biogeographic analyses using extinction-free and state-dependent speciation and extinction models to document the evolutionary history of wild silkmoths in space and time. Using gene genealogy interrogation, we showed that saturation of nucleotide sequence data blurs our understanding of early divergences and first biogeographic events. Our results support a Neotropical origin of saturniids but remain inconclusive with respect to the extent of the ancestral range for the family. The “traditional” hypothesis of an origin restricted to the Neotropics is supported by models that account for founder-effect dispersal, but a new alternative scenario recovered from other models is proposed and considered a better fit to the hypothetical modes of diversification in these moths. It estimates a broader ancestral range covering the Neotropical, West Nearctic, and East Palearctic bioregions and emphasizes the critical role of Beringia as a route between the New World and the Old World during the Eocene. Interestingly, all the early branching lineages of Saturniidae that diversified into today’s recognized subfamilies are characterized by a very strong geographic conservatism, except for one noticeable exception, the Saturniinae subfamily, that is now present on all continents but Antarctica. Overall, our results provide a framework for in-depth investigations into the spatial and temporal dynamics of all saturniid lineages and for the integration of their evolutionary history into further global studies of biodiversity and conservation. Rather unexpectedly for a taxonomically well-known family such as Saturniidae, the proper alignment of taxonomic divisions and ranks with our phylogenetic results leads us to propose substantial rearrangements of the family classification, including the description of one new subfamily and two new tribes.

Related

  1. A global mitochondrial genomic atlas illuminates freshwater microeukaryote diversity
    Lucas Serra Moncadas, Hans-Joachim Ruscheweyh, Jason Woodhouse +10
    Nature CommunicationsPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textMolecular biology & gene regulationPMC
  2. The Spirogyra pratensis genome illuminates the evolution of developmental programs and spiral chloroplast biology
    Elisa S. Goldbecker, Deepti Varshney, Anja Holzhausen +22
    The Plant cellPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full text9 citedMolecular biology & gene regulationHALOpenAlex
  3. Type-Strain-Anchored Phylogenomics Reveals Taxonomic Discordance and Functional Variation in Agrobacterium
    Maria S. Filatova, Peter V. Evseev, Alexander N. Ignatov +3
    International Journal of Molecular SciencesPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textMolecular biology & gene regulationCrossrefEurope PMC
  4. Systematic bias undermines mitochondrial phylogenomics of deep divergences of Diptera
    Debajyoti Kabiraj, Pulakeswar Basumatary
    Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textMolecular biology & gene regulationDOAJ
  5. The genome sequence of the Barred Marble, Celypha striana (Denis & Schiffermüller, 1775) (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) [version 1; peer review: 2 approved]
    Liam M. Crowley, Finley Hutchinson
    Wellcome Open ResearchPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textMolecular biology & gene regulationDOAJ
BibTeX
@article{rougerie2026phylogenomics,
  title = {{Phylogenomics Illuminates the Evolutionary History of Wild Silkmoths in Space and Time (Lepidoptera: Saturniidae)}},
  author = {Rodolphe Rougerie and Astrid Cruaud and Pierre Arnal and Liliana Ballesteros‐Mejia and Thibaud Decaëns and Marianne Élias and Delphine Gey and Paul D. N. Hebert and Ian J. Kitching and Sébastien Lavergne and Carlos López‐Vaamonde and Jérôme Murienne and Yves Cuenot and Sabine Nidelet and Fabien L. Condamine and Jean–Yves Rasplus},
  journal = {Systematic Biology},
  year = {2026},
  month = jul,
  doi = {10.1093/sysbio/syag056},
  url = {https://hal.science/hal-05743702v1},
  note = {CC BY-NC-ND 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Phylogenomics Illuminates the Evolutionary History of Wild Silkmoths in Space and Time (Lepidoptera: Saturniidae)
AU  - Rodolphe Rougerie
AU  - Astrid Cruaud
AU  - Pierre Arnal
AU  - Liliana Ballesteros‐Mejia
AU  - Thibaud Decaëns
AU  - Marianne Élias
AU  - Delphine Gey
AU  - Paul D. N. Hebert
AU  - Ian J. Kitching
AU  - Sébastien Lavergne
AU  - Carlos López‐Vaamonde
AU  - Jérôme Murienne
AU  - Yves Cuenot
AU  - Sabine Nidelet
AU  - Fabien L. Condamine
AU  - Jean–Yves Rasplus
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/07/24
JO  - Systematic Biology
DO  - 10.1093/sysbio/syag056
UR  - https://hal.science/hal-05743702v1
AB  - Wild silkmoths (Saturniidae) are one of the most emblematic and well-studied families of moths. Yet, the absence of a robust phylogenetic framework based on a comprehensive taxonomic sampling impedes our understanding of their evolutionary history. We sequenced and analyzed 1024 ultraconserved elements (UCEs) and their flanking regions to infer the relationships among 338 species of Saturniidae representing all described subfamilies, tribes, and genera. We investigated systematic biases in genomic data and performed dating and historical biogeographic analyses using extinction-free and state-dependent speciation and extinction models to document the evolutionary history of wild silkmoths in space and time. Using gene genealogy interrogation, we showed that saturation of nucleotide sequence data blurs our understanding of early divergences and first biogeographic events. Our results support a Neotropical origin of saturniids but remain inconclusive with respect to the extent of the ancestral range for the family. The “traditional” hypothesis of an origin restricted to the Neotropics is supported by models that account for founder-effect dispersal, but a new alternative scenario recovered from other models is proposed and considered a better fit to the hypothetical modes of diversification in these moths. It estimates a broader ancestral range covering the Neotropical, West Nearctic, and East Palearctic bioregions and emphasizes the critical role of Beringia as a route between the New World and the Old World during the Eocene. Interestingly, all the early branching lineages of Saturniidae that diversified into today’s recognized subfamilies are characterized by a very strong geographic conservatism, except for one noticeable exception, the Saturniinae subfamily, that is now present on all continents but Antarctica. Overall, our results provide a framework for in-depth investigations into the spatial and temporal dynamics of all saturniid lineages and for the integration of their evolutionary history into further global studies of biodiversity and conservation. Rather unexpectedly for a taxonomically well-known family such as Saturniidae, the proper alignment of taxonomic divisions and ranks with our phylogenetic results leads us to propose substantial rearrangements of the family classification, including the description of one new subfamily and two new tribes.
SN  - 1063-5157
SN  - 1076-836X
ER  -