Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
194,161 studies31 sourcesUpdated just now
Peer-reviewedCC BYJournal of Neuroinflammation

Neuroimmune braking mechanisms in exercise-related musculoskeletal injury: from nociceptors to tissue regeneration

  1. 1Department of Strength and Conditioning, School of Sports Training, Nanjing Sport Institute
  2. 2School of Physical Education, Jingdezhen University

Abstract

Background Musculoskeletal injuries are a frequent occurrence in sports medicine and rehabilitation, and their healing process needs an accurate response from inflammation. Recent studies show that sensory neurons play a critical role in tissue repair through neuropeptides, which is quite different from their usual function as simple pain detectors. The current review summarizes studies conducted during the last ten years concerning neuroimmune crosstalk mechanisms in musculoskeletal injury healing, in which the role of sensory neurons in macrophage polarization is emphasized. Methods We reviewed preclinical studies on the neuro-immune interaction after musculoskeletal injury, emphasizing the CGRP-RAMP1-thrombospondin-1 axis and parallel pathways including TGF-β-mediated macrophage specification and TAFA4-IL-10 signaling. Based on rodent data regarding skin wounds, muscle injury, peripheral nerve injury, and other pertinent models, a theoretical model relating mechanical loading and neuroimmune inhibition was established. Results CGRP-RAMP1-Thrombospondin 1 signaling pathway has been identified in preclinical studies as an candidate pathway for shifting macrophages from a pro-inflammatory (M1) to a pro-repair (M2) phenotype, hence balancing the process of pathogen clearance against tissue repair process. Parallel systems, such as TGF-β-mediated macrophage specification and TAFA4-IL-10 signaling, provide redundancy and robustness. Controlled loading, as seen with active recovery, causes stimulation of sensory neuron terminals, leads to the release of neuropeptides, triggers the neuroimmune braking process, and promotes proper M1-to-M2 conversion. The understanding of these mechanisms explains why patients have always been advised to undertake active recovery rather than rest following tendon/ligament damage. Conclusion This review proposes a new conceptual framework in which the neuroimmune axis may serve as a key controller of musculoskeletal repair. These biological mechanisms offer a potential explanation for the medical choice of active recovery over complete rest following specific injuries; nevertheless, there is no direct evidence in humans, and this theory needs to be tested in human studies.

Related

  1. The effects of resistance exercise snacks via a mobile health app on musculoskeletal strength in sedentary young women: a randomized controlled trial
    Zhangyuting Shang, Ziren Zhao, Xin Zheng +4
    Frontiers in physiologyPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  2. Gut Microbiota-Driven Neuroimmune Crosstalk in Ulcerative Colitis: From Mechanisms to Therapeutic Implications
    Lihan Yu, Lei He, Yanjun Lu
    BiomedicinesPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  3. Leucocytes, cytokines and satellite cells: what role do they play in muscle damage and regeneration following eccentric exercise?
    Gøran Paulsen, Ulla Ramer Mikkelsen, Truls Raastad +1
    PubMedPeer-reviewedLicence not stated572 citedPhysiologyOpenAlex
  4. Mechanisms of neuroimmune crosstalk in vestibular disorders: Linking inflammation with neural circuit dysfunction (Review)
    Xianfang Pan, Jin Fan, Zhiyi Yang +6
    International Journal of Molecular MedicinePeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textNeurologyPMC
  5. Beyond Synovitis: Molecular and Neuroimmune Mechanisms Informing Target-Joint Attribution and Pain Phenotyping for Arthroplasty in Inflammatory Arthritis.
    Michal Pruc, Andrzej Bielski, Robert Weglowski +7
    International journal of molecular sciencesPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textPhysiologyEurope PMC
BibTeX
@article{xie2026neuroimmune,
  title = {{Neuroimmune braking mechanisms in exercise-related musculoskeletal injury: from nociceptors to tissue regeneration}},
  author = {Enli Xie and Yushan He and Tainan Cao and Changchun Li and Zhiming Wang},
  journal = {Journal of Neuroinflammation},
  year = {2026},
  month = jul,
  doi = {10.1186/s12974-026-03938-5},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1186/s12974-026-03938-5},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Neuroimmune braking mechanisms in exercise-related musculoskeletal injury: from nociceptors to tissue regeneration
AU  - Enli Xie
AU  - Yushan He
AU  - Tainan Cao
AU  - Changchun Li
AU  - Zhiming Wang
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/07/01
JO  - Journal of Neuroinflammation
DO  - 10.1186/s12974-026-03938-5
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1186/s12974-026-03938-5
AB  - Background Musculoskeletal injuries are a frequent occurrence in sports medicine and rehabilitation, and their healing process needs an accurate response from inflammation. Recent studies show that sensory neurons play a critical role in tissue repair through neuropeptides, which is quite different from their usual function as simple pain detectors. The current review summarizes studies conducted during the last ten years concerning neuroimmune crosstalk mechanisms in musculoskeletal injury healing, in which the role of sensory neurons in macrophage polarization is emphasized. Methods We reviewed preclinical studies on the neuro-immune interaction after musculoskeletal injury, emphasizing the CGRP-RAMP1-thrombospondin-1 axis and parallel pathways including TGF-β-mediated macrophage specification and TAFA4-IL-10 signaling. Based on rodent data regarding skin wounds, muscle injury, peripheral nerve injury, and other pertinent models, a theoretical model relating mechanical loading and neuroimmune inhibition was established. Results CGRP-RAMP1-Thrombospondin 1 signaling pathway has been identified in preclinical studies as an candidate pathway for shifting macrophages from a pro-inflammatory (M1) to a pro-repair (M2) phenotype, hence balancing the process of pathogen clearance against tissue repair process. Parallel systems, such as TGF-β-mediated macrophage specification and TAFA4-IL-10 signaling, provide redundancy and robustness. Controlled loading, as seen with active recovery, causes stimulation of sensory neuron terminals, leads to the release of neuropeptides, triggers the neuroimmune braking process, and promotes proper M1-to-M2 conversion. The understanding of these mechanisms explains why patients have always been advised to undertake active recovery rather than rest following tendon/ligament damage. Conclusion This review proposes a new conceptual framework in which the neuroimmune axis may serve as a key controller of musculoskeletal repair. These biological mechanisms offer a potential explanation for the medical choice of active recovery over complete rest following specific injuries; nevertheless, there is no direct evidence in humans, and this theory needs to be tested in human studies.
SN  - 1742-2094
ER  -