Hydrodynamic and electrochemical assessment of a compact continuous-flow electrocoagulation reactor for decentralized household wastewater treatment
- 1University of Economics and Technology for Industries, 456 Minh Khai Street, Hanoi, Viet Nam
- 2Chemistry Specialized Class, Hanoi-Amsterdam High School for the Gifted, Hanoi, Viet Nam
- 3University of Economics and Technology for Industries, 456 Minh Khai Street, Hanoi, Viet Nam; Corresponding author.
Abstract
Compact continuous-flow electrocoagulation (EC) was evaluated for decentralized household wastewater treatment by integrating treatment experiments, residence-time-distribution (RTD) analysis, three-dimensional CFD, and electrical-energy assessment. The 3.0-L reactor employed four aluminum anodes and five stainless-steel cathodes in a monopolar-parallel arrangement with 15-mm spacing. Over nominal HRTs of 9–18 min, RTD indicated predominantly convective transport with finite axial dispersion, while single-phase CFD showed localized recirculation around the electrode array. Across the experimental series, COD removal reached 75–88%, turbidity removal exceeded 90%, TSS removal reached approximately 85–90%, and MBAS removal reached 84%. Separate series identified favorable ranges of 20–30 mA cm⁻² and 15–18 min. A paired confirmatory experiment at 15 min directly compared 20 and 25 mA cm⁻²; pollutant-removal gains at 25 mA cm⁻² were modest, whereas supply-reported specific electrical energy increased from 1.045 ± 0.031–1.431 ± 0.018 kWh m⁻³ . Thus, 20 mA cm⁻² at 15 min provided the more favorable treatment–electrical-input compromise among the two tested combinations. Faradaic aluminum doses remained theoretical, and residual aluminum, microbiological quality, and long-term robustness were not verified. The result does not establish a global optimum or reuse-ready effluent.
Related
- Hydrodynamic and ecological modeling for water quality assessment in Lake Qaroun, Egypt
- Comparative Hydrodynamic Assessment of Twill-Woven Feed Spacers in Flat-Sheet Ultrafiltration Membrane Cassettes: Balancing Hydraulic Resistance and Near-Membrane Flow Enhancement.
- Continuous Solar-Adaptive Electrochemical Stripping for Circular Nitrogen Recovery from Urine
- All-in-one continuous electrochemical monitoring of 2-phenylphenol removal from water by electro-Fenton treatment
- Kinetic Modeling of Iron Electrocoagulation in Moderate to Slightly Acidic Media
BibTeX
@article{tuan2026hydrodynamic,
title = {{Hydrodynamic and electrochemical assessment of a compact continuous-flow electrocoagulation reactor for decentralized household wastewater treatment}},
author = {Hoang Anh Tuan and Le Huynh Duc and Nguyen Tuong Vi and Nguyen Ngoc Anh and Trieu Quy Huy},
journal = {Desalination and Water Treatment},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.1016/j.dwt.2026.102002},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dwt.2026.102002},
note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Hydrodynamic and electrochemical assessment of a compact continuous-flow electrocoagulation reactor for decentralized household wastewater treatment
AU - Hoang Anh Tuan
AU - Le Huynh Duc
AU - Nguyen Tuong Vi
AU - Nguyen Ngoc Anh
AU - Trieu Quy Huy
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/25
JO - Desalination and Water Treatment
DO - 10.1016/j.dwt.2026.102002
UR - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dwt.2026.102002
AB - Compact continuous-flow electrocoagulation (EC) was evaluated for decentralized household wastewater treatment by integrating treatment experiments, residence-time-distribution (RTD) analysis, three-dimensional CFD, and electrical-energy assessment. The 3.0-L reactor employed four aluminum anodes and five stainless-steel cathodes in a monopolar-parallel arrangement with 15-mm spacing. Over nominal HRTs of 9–18 min, RTD indicated predominantly convective transport with finite axial dispersion, while single-phase CFD showed localized recirculation around the electrode array. Across the experimental series, COD removal reached 75–88%, turbidity removal exceeded 90%, TSS removal reached approximately 85–90%, and MBAS removal reached 84%. Separate series identified favorable ranges of 20–30 mA cm⁻² and 15–18 min. A paired confirmatory experiment at 15 min directly compared 20 and 25 mA cm⁻²; pollutant-removal gains at 25 mA cm⁻² were modest, whereas supply-reported specific electrical energy increased from 1.045 ± 0.031–1.431 ± 0.018 kWh m⁻³ . Thus, 20 mA cm⁻² at 15 min provided the more favorable treatment–electrical-input compromise among the two tested combinations. Faradaic aluminum doses remained theoretical, and residual aluminum, microbiological quality, and long-term robustness were not verified. The result does not establish a global optimum or reuse-ready effluent.
SN - 1944-3986
SN - 1944-3994
ER -