Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
181,686 studies31 sourcesUpdated 11 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BYMembranes

Comparative Hydrodynamic Assessment of Twill-Woven Feed Spacers in Flat-Sheet Ultrafiltration Membrane Cassettes: Balancing Hydraulic Resistance and Near-Membrane Flow Enhancement.

  1. 1College of Chemical Engineering, Beijing University of Chemical Technology, Chaoyang Campus, Beijing 100029, China.
  2. 2Hangzhou Horizone Technologies Co., Ltd., Hangzhou 310018, China.

Abstract

Feed spacers can promote membrane-side transport in flat-sheet ultrafiltration channels, but the accompanying hydraulic resistance increases pumping demand. This study combined pure-water pressure-drop measurements with transient three-dimensional ANSYS Fluent simulations to compare a commercial 2/1 twill-woven spacer (T-Base) and 16 systematically varied candidate configurations. A geometry-resolved finite-volume model was evaluated through computational-domain, mesh, and time-step sensitivity assessments; the predicted pressure gradients agreed with the measurements with a mean relative deviation below 4%. The methodological novelty lies in integrating pressure-normalized near-wall efficacy, bilateral wall shear stress balance, and equal-area spatial sampling within a geometry-resolved, multi-indicator framework for comparing spacer configurations with different periodic lengths and mesh densities. At a 60° low attack angle and a superficial inlet velocity of 0.0551 m·s⁻¹, T3823 (filament spacing 0.38 mm, filament diameter 0.23 mm, spacer thickness 0.44 mm) provided the most favorable hydrodynamic trade-off among the 16 candidates. It produced a near-membrane velocity of 0.0220 m·s⁻¹ and a pressure gradient of 53.5 kPa·m⁻¹; its pressure-normalized near-wall efficacy was 1.23 relative to T-Base. T3823 also reduced bilateral membrane shear deviation from 24.91% to 8.30% and near-wall velocity dispersion by 50.7%. Overall, the results highlight the value of coordinated spacer-geometry optimization for balancing near-membrane flow enhancement and hydraulic resistance, with T3823 emerging as the most promising configuration among the candidates evaluated.

Related

  1. Heavy metal bioaccumulation potential of indigenous rhizospheric soil fungi with comparative assessment of lead and cadmium resistance
    Insha Amin, Ruqeya Nazir, Mushtaq Ahmad Rather +1
    Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textEnvironmental science & pollutionCrossref
  2. Hydrodynamic and ecological modeling for water quality assessment in Lake Qaroun, Egypt
    Nermeen E. Eltahan, Noha H. Moghazy, Ibrahim Gaafar +1
    Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textGeology & geochemistryCrossref
  3. Hydrodynamic and electrochemical assessment of a compact continuous-flow electrocoagulation reactor for decentralized household wastewater treatment
    Hoang Anh Tuan, Le Huynh Duc, Nguyen Tuong Vi +2
    Desalination and Water TreatmentPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textHydrology & soilsDOAJ
  4. Mechanistic Divergence and Ozone Mass Transfer Enhancement in Photocatalytic Ozonation: A Comparative Study of Bimetallic Pd/Cu-Modified Rutile TiO2 and g-C3N4
    Marta Gmurek, Cong Xiaoyu, Jacek Balcerzak +8
    ACS OmegaPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textHydrology & soilsCrossrefEurope PMCEurope PMCPMC
  5. Assessment of Cloud Responses and Effects of Artificial Precipitation Enhancement Using Doppler Dual-Polarization Radar Observations
    Yuduo Feng, Debin Su, Ning Yang +3
    AtmospherePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textAtmospheric science & meteorologyDOAJ
BibTeX
@article{li2026comparative,
  title = {{Comparative Hydrodynamic Assessment of Twill-Woven Feed Spacers in Flat-Sheet Ultrafiltration Membrane Cassettes: Balancing Hydraulic Resistance and Near-Membrane Flow Enhancement.}},
  author = {Shu Li and Hongbo Huang and Dongzhu Wu and Junteng Liu},
  journal = {Membranes},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.3390/membranes16100329},
  url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42931007},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Comparative Hydrodynamic Assessment of Twill-Woven Feed Spacers in Flat-Sheet Ultrafiltration Membrane Cassettes: Balancing Hydraulic Resistance and Near-Membrane Flow Enhancement.
AU  - Shu Li
AU  - Hongbo Huang
AU  - Dongzhu Wu
AU  - Junteng Liu
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/30
JO  - Membranes
DO  - 10.3390/membranes16100329
UR  - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42931007
AB  - Feed spacers can promote membrane-side transport in flat-sheet ultrafiltration channels, but the accompanying hydraulic resistance increases pumping demand. This study combined pure-water pressure-drop measurements with transient three-dimensional ANSYS Fluent simulations to compare a commercial 2/1 twill-woven spacer (T-Base) and 16 systematically varied candidate configurations. A geometry-resolved finite-volume model was evaluated through computational-domain, mesh, and time-step sensitivity assessments; the predicted pressure gradients agreed with the measurements with a mean relative deviation below 4%. The methodological novelty lies in integrating pressure-normalized near-wall efficacy, bilateral wall shear stress balance, and equal-area spatial sampling within a geometry-resolved, multi-indicator framework for comparing spacer configurations with different periodic lengths and mesh densities. At a 60° low attack angle and a superficial inlet velocity of 0.0551 m·s⁻¹, T3823 (filament spacing 0.38 mm, filament diameter 0.23 mm, spacer thickness 0.44 mm) provided the most favorable hydrodynamic trade-off among the 16 candidates. It produced a near-membrane velocity of 0.0220 m·s⁻¹ and a pressure gradient of 53.5 kPa·m⁻¹; its pressure-normalized near-wall efficacy was 1.23 relative to T-Base. T3823 also reduced bilateral membrane shear deviation from 24.91% to 8.30% and near-wall velocity dispersion by 50.7%. Overall, the results highlight the value of coordinated spacer-geometry optimization for balancing near-membrane flow enhancement and hydraulic resistance, with T3823 emerging as the most promising configuration among the candidates evaluated.
SN  - 2077-0375
ER  -