Nicotine Equivalence Across Modern Delivery Systems: A Clinical Framework for Perioperative Assessment
- 1Univeristy of Toledo College of Medicine
- 2Department of Orthopedic Surgery Henry Ford Health System
Abstract
Background: Nicotine use is a well-established risk factor for impaired bone healing, infection, and poor outcomes following orthopedic surgery. Although perioperative assessment traditionally focuses on cigarette smoking, nicotine consumption has shifted toward electronic cigarettes, oral nicotine pouches, and other alternative systems. Many of these products deliver nicotine doses that equal or exceed those of traditional cigarettes, yet no standardized clinical method exists to quantify and compare exposure across products. This review provides an updated framework for nicotine exposure equivalence using cigarette pack equivalents, enabling clinicians to estimate systemic nicotine absorption across delivery systems. Methods: A narrative review was conducted of PubMed, Google Scholar, and Scopus for studies related to nicotine delivery systems, orthopedic outcomes, bone healing, and fracture through 2024. Nicotine concentrations from major brands and route-specific bioavailability data were identified from the literature. Cigarette pack equivalents were calculated using published bioavailability estimates and standardized against estimated systemic nicotine delivery from one pack of cigarettes. Results: Our model demonstrates many alternative products deliver nicotine comparable to or exceeding traditional cigarettes: a single 5,000-puff disposable vape delivers systemic nicotine equivalent to approximately 25 packs of cigarettes, a can of 6 mg nicotine pouches is exceeds 2 packs, and a single JUUL pod approximates 1 pack. Discussion: Despite differences in delivery mechanisms and pharmacokinetics, nicotine's negative effects on fracture and wound healing remain present. As nicotine usage evolves, surgeons must evaluate usage beyond cigarettes alone. This framework provides a practical method to estimate total and systemic nicotine exposure across delivery systems.
Related
- Standardized perioperative terminology for emergency cervical cerclage: A framework for feasibility and procedural complexity assessment
- The collective effect of non-nicotine constituents on the reinforcing and neuropharmacological effects of comprehensive cigarette smoke and electronic nicotine delivery system (ENDS) aerosol extracts in rats.
- Exposure to Toxicologically Relevant Inorganic Elements and Nicotine Content Variability in Electronic Nicotine Delivery System (ENDS) E-Liquids.
- The Physicochemical Principles Governing Nicotine Delivery from Oral Nicotine Pouches.
- Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems Policy Divergence and Surveillance Gaps: A Cancer Prevention Blind Spot in the WHO South-East Asia Region
BibTeX
@article{esser2026nicotine,
title = {{Nicotine Equivalence Across Modern Delivery Systems: A Clinical Framework for Perioperative Assessment}},
author = {Katherine Esser and Kashif Javid and Damon Ross and Ali Mehaidli and Muhammad J Abbas and Lafi Khalil and Stuart T Guthrie and Kevin Taliaferro},
journal = {Orthopedic Reviews},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.52965/001c.172843},
url = {https://doi.org/10.52965/001c.172843},
note = {CC BY-NC},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Nicotine Equivalence Across Modern Delivery Systems: A Clinical Framework for Perioperative Assessment
AU - Katherine Esser
AU - Kashif Javid
AU - Damon Ross
AU - Ali Mehaidli
AU - Muhammad J Abbas
AU - Lafi Khalil
AU - Stuart T Guthrie
AU - Kevin Taliaferro
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/30
JO - Orthopedic Reviews
DO - 10.52965/001c.172843
UR - https://doi.org/10.52965/001c.172843
AB - Background: Nicotine use is a well-established risk factor for impaired bone healing, infection, and poor outcomes following orthopedic surgery. Although perioperative assessment traditionally focuses on cigarette smoking, nicotine consumption has shifted toward electronic cigarettes, oral nicotine pouches, and other alternative systems. Many of these products deliver nicotine doses that equal or exceed those of traditional cigarettes, yet no standardized clinical method exists to quantify and compare exposure across products. This review provides an updated framework for nicotine exposure equivalence using cigarette pack equivalents, enabling clinicians to estimate systemic nicotine absorption across delivery systems. Methods: A narrative review was conducted of PubMed, Google Scholar, and Scopus for studies related to nicotine delivery systems, orthopedic outcomes, bone healing, and fracture through 2024. Nicotine concentrations from major brands and route-specific bioavailability data were identified from the literature. Cigarette pack equivalents were calculated using published bioavailability estimates and standardized against estimated systemic nicotine delivery from one pack of cigarettes. Results: Our model demonstrates many alternative products deliver nicotine comparable to or exceeding traditional cigarettes: a single 5,000-puff disposable vape delivers systemic nicotine equivalent to approximately 25 packs of cigarettes, a can of 6 mg nicotine pouches is exceeds 2 packs, and a single JUUL pod approximates 1 pack. Discussion: Despite differences in delivery mechanisms and pharmacokinetics, nicotine's negative effects on fracture and wound healing remain present. As nicotine usage evolves, surgeons must evaluate usage beyond cigarettes alone. This framework provides a practical method to estimate total and systemic nicotine exposure across delivery systems.
SN - 2035-8237
SN - 2035-8164
ER -