Data ethics and its role for trust, equity and innovation in the EHDS
Abstract
Issue/problem: The European Health Data Space (EHDS) creates new opportunities for secondary use of health data. Simultaneously, it raises concerns about secure, transparent, fair and responsible data use. The EHDS regulation leaves responsibility for ethics expertise largely to Member States (MS), creating ambiguities and risks of inconsistent interpretation.
Description of the problem: Using a multi‑method approach, the study examined whether existing ethical governance structures are equipped to address upcoming ethical challenges under the EHDS. Based on the European Network of Research Ethics Committees an in-depth mapping and comparison of ethical expertise and secondary use processes was carried out, complemented by a workshop on the role of ethics in the EHDS conducted within the TEHDAS2 Joint Action and supported by six semi-structured qualitative expert interviews across four European countries. The analysis explored which new expertise data ethics requires, how benefits and risks of secondary use can be assessed, and the consequences of fragmented ethics requirements across MS.
Results: Results suggest that existing ethical structures, such as clinical trials regulation and bioethical committees, are insufficient for the ethical challenges posed by secondary use of health data. Relevant expertise appears fragmented and weakly institutionalized, particularly beyond national contexts, underscoring the need for harmonized approaches to ensure accountability and equity.
Lessons: Data ethics should be institutionalized as a core governance element of the EHDS. Embedding interdisciplinary expertise and building ethical capacity is essential to enable sustainable, equitable, and transparent secondary use of health data. Without coordinated ethical frameworks, the EHDS risks ethics dumping, declining public trust, unequal benefits and administrative burdens. This analysis underscores the role of harmonized data ethics as an enabler for innovation.
Key messages: • The EHDS offers new opportunities for secondary use but lacks harmonised ethical governance, thus risking fragmentation, ethics dumping and loss of public trust.
• A data ethics beyond traditional bioethics is needed, to ensure fair, transparent, equitable and efficient data use across Europe.
Related
- Balancing innovation and ethics: responsible governance of artificial intelligence hallucinations in healthcare.
- Development of an ethical resolution process and education resources: supporting equity-focused public health ethics education through community-engaged research.
- Ethics of Telerehabilitation in Supportive Cancer Care Through a Responsible Innovation Lens.
- Modernising public health surveillance in an EHDS-enabled Europe: building a coordinated European public health intelligence ecosystem
- Between Likes and Ethics: Benefits and Challenges of Social Media Use in Medical Practice in a Pre- and Post-intervention Study
BibTeX
@article{echanove2026data,
title = {{Data ethics and its role for trust, equity and innovation in the EHDS}},
author = {C Fischer Echanove and L Ferent},
journal = {The European Journal of Public Health},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.1093/eurpub/ckag169.1307},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckag169.1307},
note = {CC BY-NC 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Data ethics and its role for trust, equity and innovation in the EHDS
AU - C Fischer Echanove
AU - L Ferent
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/01
JO - The European Journal of Public Health
DO - 10.1093/eurpub/ckag169.1307
UR - https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckag169.1307
AB - Issue/problem: The European Health Data Space (EHDS) creates new opportunities for secondary use of health data. Simultaneously, it raises concerns about secure, transparent, fair and responsible data use. The EHDS regulation leaves responsibility for ethics expertise largely to Member States (MS), creating ambiguities and risks of inconsistent interpretation. Description of the problem: Using a multi‑method approach, the study examined whether existing ethical governance structures are equipped to address upcoming ethical challenges under the EHDS. Based on the European Network of Research Ethics Committees an in-depth mapping and comparison of ethical expertise and secondary use processes was carried out, complemented by a workshop on the role of ethics in the EHDS conducted within the TEHDAS2 Joint Action and supported by six semi-structured qualitative expert interviews across four European countries. The analysis explored which new expertise data ethics requires, how benefits and risks of secondary use can be assessed, and the consequences of fragmented ethics requirements across MS. Results: Results suggest that existing ethical structures, such as clinical trials regulation and bioethical committees, are insufficient for the ethical challenges posed by secondary use of health data. Relevant expertise appears fragmented and weakly institutionalized, particularly beyond national contexts, underscoring the need for harmonized approaches to ensure accountability and equity. Lessons: Data ethics should be institutionalized as a core governance element of the EHDS. Embedding interdisciplinary expertise and building ethical capacity is essential to enable sustainable, equitable, and transparent secondary use of health data. Without coordinated ethical frameworks, the EHDS risks ethics dumping, declining public trust, unequal benefits and administrative burdens. This analysis underscores the role of harmonized data ethics as an enabler for innovation. Key messages: • The EHDS offers new opportunities for secondary use but lacks harmonised ethical governance, thus risking fragmentation, ethics dumping and loss of public trust. • A data ethics beyond traditional bioethics is needed, to ensure fair, transparent, equitable and efficient data use across Europe.
SN - 1101-1262
SN - 1464-360X
ER -