Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
201,818 studies31 sourcesUpdated 10 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDBMC medical ethics

Development of an ethical resolution process and education resources: supporting equity-focused public health ethics education through community-engaged research.

5 affiliations
  1. 1School of Nursing, Faculty of Applied Sciences, The University of British Columbia, 4288 - 5955 University Blvd, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z1, Canada. [email protected].
  2. 2School of Nursing, Faculty of Applied Sciences, The University of British Columbia, 4288 - 5955 University Blvd, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z1, Canada.
  3. 3Continuing Professional Development, Faculty of Medicine, The University of British Columbia, 200 - 555 West 12th Avenue, Vancouver, BC, V5Z 3X7, Canada.
  4. 4Clinical Ethics and Spiritual Care Service, Provincial Health Services Authority, 1333 West Broadway, Vancouver, BC, V6H 1G9, Canada.
  5. 5Department of Medical Genetics, The University of British Columbia, C234 - 4500 Oak Street, Vancouver, BC, V6H 3N1, Canada.

Abstract

Background

Healthcare ethics education is essential for supporting trainees and health professionals to build ethical reasoning skills necessary to resolve complex ethical issues, support equitable health outcomes, and promote just healthcare systems. Traditional ethical decision-making frameworks, grounded in principles-based approaches, may be insufficient in supporting a process of resolving clinical and public health ethical dilemmas that is attentive to both sociopolitical context and inclusion of parties most impacted by ethical issues. While many approaches to ethics education show promise, healthcare system resource constraints result in challenges in delivering ethics education.Methods

The aim of this project was to develop an equity-focused process for resolving ethical dilemmas in healthcare and to produce evidence-informed public health ethics education resources in British Columbia, Canada. A consultation process was undertaken to develop and refine an ethical resolution process to support healthcare ethics practice. An empirical qualitative study was conducted with members of equity-denied communities to inform educational resource development. An online course was collaboratively developed, based on the ethical resolution process and empirical data, that used universal design principles, scaffolded learning activities, and original artwork.Results

The ethical resolution process supports iterative and flexible analysis of clinical and public health ethics issues, consisting of five components: ethical dilemma, impacted parties, information, options, resolution. Public health ethics values and principles prioritized by participants included accessibility, transparency, and wholistic wellbeing. Other points of emphasis were acknowledgement of upstream causes, focus on current ethical issues, application of intersectionality, and incorporation of Indigenous Ways of Knowing. Participants made several recommendations to support development of education resources. The end products included a public health ethics guide and an accompanying openly accessible asynchronous online course in which fictional scenarios based on findings from the qualitative study were analyzed through the ethical resolution process.Conclusion

This project incorporated theoretical understandings of ethics and instructional design with qualitative data and the realities of providing ethics education in resource-constrained environments. A collaborative, interdisciplinary approach brought together those most impacted by public health ethics dilemmas, public health professionals, ethicists, and instructional designers to develop evidence-informed, context-specific, openly accessible online resources to support healthcare ethics education.

Related

  1. “We teach the students that mainstream can’t teach”: a mixed-methods examination of staff wellbeing, resources, and digital support potential in Ireland’s alternative education sector
    Justin Laiti, Lorna Burke, Elaine Byrne +3
    BMC Public HealthPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Epidemiology & public healthCrossref
  2. Development of a multimodal health education module for dementia prevention in at-risk rural Indian elders: a SMRUTHI INDIA initiative
    Kritika Sharma, Aditi Dubey, Shubham Gupta +57
    Frontiers in dementiaPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  3. Co-creating point-of-care ultrasound education for family medicine in Ethiopia: reflections on pedagogy, faculty development, and academic partnership.
    Bilal Negash, Leila Makhani, Jamie Rodas +3
    Frontiers in medicinePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  4. Evolution of Pharmacy Education and Pharmacist Competency Development in Japan in Response to Changing Healthcare Demands
    Kayoko Takeda Mamiya
    Biological and Pharmaceutical BulletinPeer-reviewedCC BY-NCFull textPharmacology & toxicologyJ-STAGE
  5. Developing national meta-accreditation standards for medical education accreditation bodies in Iran: a mixed-methods standards development and consensus study.
    Tahereh Sabouri Aghbolagh Rostam Khan, Tahereh Changiz, Azim Mirzazadeh +2
    Npj health systemsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull text2 citedEpidemiology & public healthEurope PMC
BibTeX
@article{clark2026development,
  title = {{Development of an ethical resolution process and education resources: supporting equity-focused public health ethics education through community-engaged research.}},
  author = {Drew B A Clark and Celeste Macevicius and Yona Gellert and Alice Virani},
  journal = {BMC medical ethics},
  year = {2026},
  month = aug,
  doi = {10.1186/s12910-026-01556-7},
  url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42958503},
  note = {CC BY-NC-ND},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Development of an ethical resolution process and education resources: supporting equity-focused public health ethics education through community-engaged research.
AU  - Drew B A Clark
AU  - Celeste Macevicius
AU  - Yona Gellert
AU  - Alice Virani
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/08/03
JO  - BMC medical ethics
DO  - 10.1186/s12910-026-01556-7
UR  - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42958503
AB  - Background  Healthcare ethics education is essential for supporting trainees and health professionals to build ethical reasoning skills necessary to resolve complex ethical issues, support equitable health outcomes, and promote just healthcare systems. Traditional ethical decision-making frameworks, grounded in principles-based approaches, may be insufficient in supporting a process of resolving clinical and public health ethical dilemmas that is attentive to both sociopolitical context and inclusion of parties most impacted by ethical issues. While many approaches to ethics education show promise, healthcare system resource constraints result in challenges in delivering ethics education.Methods  The aim of this project was to develop an equity-focused process for resolving ethical dilemmas in healthcare and to produce evidence-informed public health ethics education resources in British Columbia, Canada. A consultation process was undertaken to develop and refine an ethical resolution process to support healthcare ethics practice. An empirical qualitative study was conducted with members of equity-denied communities to inform educational resource development. An online course was collaboratively developed, based on the ethical resolution process and empirical data, that used universal design principles, scaffolded learning activities, and original artwork.Results  The ethical resolution process supports iterative and flexible analysis of clinical and public health ethics issues, consisting of five components: ethical dilemma, impacted parties, information, options, resolution. Public health ethics values and principles prioritized by participants included accessibility, transparency, and wholistic wellbeing. Other points of emphasis were acknowledgement of upstream causes, focus on current ethical issues, application of intersectionality, and incorporation of Indigenous Ways of Knowing. Participants made several recommendations to support development of education resources. The end products included a public health ethics guide and an accompanying openly accessible asynchronous online course in which fictional scenarios based on findings from the qualitative study were analyzed through the ethical resolution process.Conclusion  This project incorporated theoretical understandings of ethics and instructional design with qualitative data and the realities of providing ethics education in resource-constrained environments. A collaborative, interdisciplinary approach brought together those most impacted by public health ethics dilemmas, public health professionals, ethicists, and instructional designers to develop evidence-informed, context-specific, openly accessible online resources to support healthcare ethics education.
SN  - 1472-6939
ER  -