Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 46 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Molecules

Hybrid QuEChERS–Micro-Solid Phase Extraction for the Determination of Chloramphenicol in Honey by HPLC-MS/MS: Method Validation and Matrix-Effect Assessment

  1. 1Department of Chemical Research of Food and Feed, National Veterinary Research Institute, 24-100 Pulawy, Poland

Abstract

An HPLC-MS/MS method combining modified QuEChERS-based extraction with micro-solid-phase extraction (MSPE) using C18P-PVDF microspin filters was developed and validated for chloramphenicol (CAP) determination in honey. At validation levels of 0.10, 0.15, and 0.30 µg kg−1, apparent recoveries ranged from 102.1% to 105.1%, repeatability (RSDr) from 4.5% to 9.5%, and within-laboratory reproducibility (RSDwR) from 6.0% to 12.5%. The decision limit (CCα) was 0.123 µg kg−1, below the reference point for action of 0.15 µg kg−1, while the estimated limit of detection (LOD; not experimentally verified) was 0.01 µg kg−1.. Matrix-effect assessment across 20 honey samples showed responses within the 80–120% range for the proposed procedure and the SPE and QuEChERS comparators. No CAP was detected in the authentic honey samples. The developed workflow provides a practical, validated alternative for routine CAP determination in honey.

Related

  1. Development and Validation of Low-Temperature Partitioning Extraction Methods for Multiresidue Determination of Pesticides in Soil and Surface Water
    Adilson Correia Goulart, Simone Machado Goulart, Anizio Marcio de Faria
    ChemRxivPreprintCC BYFull textGeneral chemistryChemRxiv
  2. A selective review of LC–MS/MS-based pesticide residue analysis (2020–2025): advances in QuEChERS methods, multi-matrix applications, and analytical validation
    S. Kathirvel, Naba Fathima, Sana Fathima +2
    Sustainable Chemistry for Climate ActionPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral chemistryEnvironmental science & pollutionDOAJ
  3. First Application of 3,5-Dinitrocatechol and Benzalkonium Chloride in Cloud Point Extraction: Spectrophotometric Determination of Vanadium(V)
    Petya Racheva, Antoaneta Saravanska, Andrea Gajdošová +4
    Molecules (Basel, Switzerland)Peer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral chemistryEurope PMC
  4. Extraction of some pesticides from grape juice samples using an amide-based polymer as a sorbent followed by gas chromatographic determination
    Fatemeh Ershad, Mir Ali Farajzadeh, Sina Mohammad Mehri +1
    RSC advancesPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral chemistryEurope PMC
  5. Effective Extraction and Determination of 3-Nitropropanoic Acid in Sugarcane Samples Based on Magnetic Solid-Phase Extraction Coupled with HPLC-MS/MS.
    Yaqi Zhang, Jing Dai, Yijing Zhao +7
    Foods (Basel, Switzerland)Peer-reviewedCC BYFull textAnalytical chemistryEurope PMC
BibTeX
@article{sniegocki2026hybrid,
  title = {{Hybrid QuEChERS–Micro-Solid Phase Extraction for the Determination of Chloramphenicol in Honey by HPLC-MS/MS: Method Validation and Matrix-Effect Assessment}},
  author = {Tomasz Śniegocki and Elżbieta Samorek and Weronika Krajewska},
  journal = {Molecules},
  year = {2026},
  month = nov,
  doi = {10.3390/molecules31213971},
  url = {https://www.mdpi.com/1420-3049/31/21/3971},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Hybrid QuEChERS–Micro-Solid Phase Extraction for the Determination of Chloramphenicol in Honey by HPLC-MS/MS: Method Validation and Matrix-Effect Assessment
AU  - Tomasz Śniegocki
AU  - Elżbieta Samorek
AU  - Weronika Krajewska
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/11/04
JO  - Molecules
DO  - 10.3390/molecules31213971
UR  - https://www.mdpi.com/1420-3049/31/21/3971
AB  - An HPLC-MS/MS method combining modified QuEChERS-based extraction with micro-solid-phase extraction (MSPE) using C18P-PVDF microspin filters was developed and validated for chloramphenicol (CAP) determination in honey. At validation levels of 0.10, 0.15, and 0.30 µg kg−1, apparent recoveries ranged from 102.1% to 105.1%, repeatability (RSDr) from 4.5% to 9.5%, and within-laboratory reproducibility (RSDwR) from 6.0% to 12.5%. The decision limit (CCα) was 0.123 µg kg−1, below the reference point for action of 0.15 µg kg−1, while the estimated limit of detection (LOD; not experimentally verified) was 0.01 µg kg−1.. Matrix-effect assessment across 20 honey samples showed responses within the 80–120% range for the proposed procedure and the SPE and QuEChERS comparators. No CAP was detected in the authentic honey samples. The developed workflow provides a practical, validated alternative for routine CAP determination in honey.
SN  - 1420-3049
ER  -