Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
201,683 studies31 sourcesUpdated 58 min ago
PreprintCC BY-NC-ND 4.0arXiv

Heterarchy in the Brain: Control as a Spectrum, Not a Chain of Command

Abstract

Neuroscience treats the brain as a control hierarchy, with cortical systems governing subcortical mechanisms. We argue that this mistakes a configuration for an architecture. Local asymmetries of influence are real, but control is relational and process-specific; because neural elements constrain one another across concurrent processes, relations can form cycles that resist a stable ranking. Evidence from learned action, cortico-cerebellar and thalamocortical loops, and defensive behavior shows that control changes with practice, task phase, urgency, viability demands, and affordances. Hierarchical order therefore characterizes time-bounded configurations, whereas heterarchy characterizes the architecture's repertoire across occasions. We propose a spectrum of control indexed by dynamical decoupling: how far behavior can depend on history, internal state, and anticipated consequences. The account yields experimentally testable predictions.

Related

  1. Saccadic Neural Command Estimation via Forward Dynamics Control: Influence of Extraocular Muscle Geometry on Physiological Plausibility
    Even Harsigny, Pablo Alvarez Corrales, Michel Duprez +1
    Multidisciplinary Biomechanics JournalPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textNeuroscienceHAL
  2. Gut–Brain Axis-Mediated Neurological Manifestations in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Mechanisms and Disease Spectrum
    Bingchan Sun, Guoxin Wang, Xiaoxia Li +7
    Journal of Neurogastroenterology and MotilityPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC 4.0Full textGenetics & genomicsPMC
  3. A reproducible buccal transcriptomic response to music exposure in autism spectrum disorder: insights into the oral-brain axis
    A. Gomez Carballa, N. E. Z. Mallah, L. Navarro +2
    bioRxivPreprintCC BY-NC-NDFull textGenetics & genomicsbioRxiv
  4. PROTFIG: one-command, publication-quality biomolecular figures
    L. A. Chi
    bioRxivPreprintCC BYFull textBioinformatics & computational biologybioRxiv
  5. GlyComboCLI enables command line-based FAIR workflows for glycan composition assignment in mass spectrometry data
    M. I. Kelly, W. C. M. Thang, C. N. I. Pang +2
    bioRxivPreprintCC BYFull text1 citedBioinformatics & computational biologybioRxiv
BibTeX
@misc{pessoa2026heterarchy,
  title = {{Heterarchy in the Brain: Control as a Spectrum, Not a Chain of Command}},
  author = {Luiz Pessoa and Andrea Gambarotto},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2610.04643},
  eprint = {2610.04643},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.04643},
  note = {CC BY-NC-ND 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Heterarchy in the Brain: Control as a Spectrum, Not a Chain of Command
AU  - Luiz Pessoa
AU  - Andrea Gambarotto
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/03
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2610.04643
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.04643
AB  - Neuroscience treats the brain as a control hierarchy, with cortical systems governing subcortical mechanisms. We argue that this mistakes a configuration for an architecture. Local asymmetries of influence are real, but control is relational and process-specific; because neural elements constrain one another across concurrent processes, relations can form cycles that resist a stable ranking. Evidence from learned action, cortico-cerebellar and thalamocortical loops, and defensive behavior shows that control changes with practice, task phase, urgency, viability demands, and affordances. Hierarchical order therefore characterizes time-bounded configurations, whereas heterarchy characterizes the architecture's repertoire across occasions. We propose a spectrum of control indexed by dynamical decoupling: how far behavior can depend on history, internal state, and anticipated consequences. The account yields experimentally testable predictions.
ER  -