Prevalence and Clinical Characteristics of Myocardial Infarction With Non-obstructive Coronary Arteries Compared With Obstructive Myocardial Infarction: A Retrospective Tertiary-Centre Study.
4 affiliations
- 1Department of Cardiology, Dr. Al Tawil Polyclinic, Sarajevo, BIH.
- 2Clinic for Heart, Blood Vessel and Rheumatic Diseases, Clinical Centre University of Sarajevo, Sarajevo, BIH.
- 3Department of Radiology, Dr. Al Tawil Polyclinic, Sarajevo, BIH.
- 4Clinic for Internal Medicine, University Clinical Centre Tuzla, Tuzla, BIH.
Abstract
Myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA) is a working diagnosis in patients who fulfil the diagnostic criteria for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) but have no coronary artery stenosis ≥50% and no clinically evident alternative diagnosis that adequately explains the presentation. It encompasses heterogeneous coronary mechanisms. To determine the prevalence and clinical characteristics of MINOCA at a tertiary cardiac centre in Bosnia and Herzegovina and to compare demographic characteristics, cardiovascular risk factors, electrocardiographic presentation, laboratory parameters and echocardiographic findings with those of patients with obstructive myocardial infarction (OMI). This retrospective single-centre observational study comprised a prevalence analysis and a comparative analysis. For the prevalence analysis, medical records of 2,341 patients admitted to the Intensive Cardiac Care Unit between April 2022 and February 2024 were reviewed, of whom 1,104 fulfilled the diagnostic criteria for AMI. For the comparative analysis, 40 patients with MINOCA identified between January 2020 and February 2024 were compared with a simple random sample of 155 eligible patients with OMI. Demographic characteristics, cardiovascular risk factors, electrocardiographic presentation, laboratory parameters and echocardiographic variables were analysed. MINOCA accounted for 32 (2.9%) MIs in the prevalence analysis. Patients with MINOCA (N = 40) were younger than patients with OMI (N = 155) (52.1 ± 15.2 vs. 59.8 ± 11.7 years; p = 0.005). Among patients with available sex data, female sex was more frequent in the MINOCA group (19 {47.5%}) than in the OMI group (43 {29.9%}; p = 0.037). The MINOCA group had a shorter hospital stay and a lower prevalence of hypertension, dyslipidaemia and active smoking. Diabetes mellitus was numerically less frequent, but the difference was not statistically significant. MINOCA more frequently presented as non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI; 19 {51.4%} vs. 20 {13.9%}; p < 0.001) and was characterised by lower peak troponin T and CK-MB concentrations, higher left ventricular ejection fraction and a lower wall motion score index. MINOCA should be approached as a heterogeneous working diagnosis rather than a uniform final diagnosis. The absence of obstructive coronary artery disease should prompt continued clinical evaluation and a structured, individualised diagnostic approach. Standardised diagnostic pathways and prospective multicentre studies incorporating comprehensive imaging and long-term clinical follow-up are needed to refine risk assessment and guide management.
Related
- Myocardial Infarction with Non-obstructive Coronary Arteries; Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma Presenting as an Acute Coronary Syndrome.
- Prevalence, causes, and predictors of 30-day readmissions after acute myocardial infarction with ventricular arrhythmias: a cohort study using the 2016–2017 national readmissions database
- Sudden Cardiac Arrest in a Previously Healthy Young Male: Perimyocarditis Presenting as Myocardial Infarction With Non-obstructive Coronary Arteries.
- Factors associated with 30-day mortality in patients with post-myocardial infarction ventricular septal rupture: a retrospective cohort study
- Minimally Invasive Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in Patients With Prior Myocardial Infarction: A Propensity Score-Matched Retrospective Study
BibTeX
@article{tawil2026prevalence,
title = {{Prevalence and Clinical Characteristics of Myocardial Infarction With Non-obstructive Coronary Arteries Compared With Obstructive Myocardial Infarction: A Retrospective Tertiary-Centre Study.}},
author = {Amina Al Tawil and Rijad Jahić and Alen Džubur and Adnan Al Tawil and Daniela Lončar and Azra Durak Nalbantic},
journal = {Cureus},
year = {2026},
month = sep,
doi = {10.7759/cureus.117051},
url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42953109},
note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Prevalence and Clinical Characteristics of Myocardial Infarction With Non-obstructive Coronary Arteries Compared With Obstructive Myocardial Infarction: A Retrospective Tertiary-Centre Study.
AU - Amina Al Tawil
AU - Rijad Jahić
AU - Alen Džubur
AU - Adnan Al Tawil
AU - Daniela Lončar
AU - Azra Durak Nalbantic
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/09/28
JO - Cureus
DO - 10.7759/cureus.117051
UR - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42953109
AB - Myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA) is a working diagnosis in patients who fulfil the diagnostic criteria for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) but have no coronary artery stenosis ≥50% and no clinically evident alternative diagnosis that adequately explains the presentation. It encompasses heterogeneous coronary mechanisms. To determine the prevalence and clinical characteristics of MINOCA at a tertiary cardiac centre in Bosnia and Herzegovina and to compare demographic characteristics, cardiovascular risk factors, electrocardiographic presentation, laboratory parameters and echocardiographic findings with those of patients with obstructive myocardial infarction (OMI). This retrospective single-centre observational study comprised a prevalence analysis and a comparative analysis. For the prevalence analysis, medical records of 2,341 patients admitted to the Intensive Cardiac Care Unit between April 2022 and February 2024 were reviewed, of whom 1,104 fulfilled the diagnostic criteria for AMI. For the comparative analysis, 40 patients with MINOCA identified between January 2020 and February 2024 were compared with a simple random sample of 155 eligible patients with OMI. Demographic characteristics, cardiovascular risk factors, electrocardiographic presentation, laboratory parameters and echocardiographic variables were analysed. MINOCA accounted for 32 (2.9%) MIs in the prevalence analysis. Patients with MINOCA (N = 40) were younger than patients with OMI (N = 155) (52.1 ± 15.2 vs. 59.8 ± 11.7 years; p = 0.005). Among patients with available sex data, female sex was more frequent in the MINOCA group (19 {47.5%}) than in the OMI group (43 {29.9%}; p = 0.037). The MINOCA group had a shorter hospital stay and a lower prevalence of hypertension, dyslipidaemia and active smoking. Diabetes mellitus was numerically less frequent, but the difference was not statistically significant. MINOCA more frequently presented as non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI; 19 {51.4%} vs. 20 {13.9%}; p < 0.001) and was characterised by lower peak troponin T and CK-MB concentrations, higher left ventricular ejection fraction and a lower wall motion score index. MINOCA should be approached as a heterogeneous working diagnosis rather than a uniform final diagnosis. The absence of obstructive coronary artery disease should prompt continued clinical evaluation and a structured, individualised diagnostic approach. Standardised diagnostic pathways and prospective multicentre studies incorporating comprehensive imaging and long-term clinical follow-up are needed to refine risk assessment and guide management.
SN - 2168-8184
ER -