Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated just now
PreprintCC BY 4.0arXiv

Sharp Antipode-Neighbor Bounds in Every Dimension

Abstract

Let P⊂ℝd be finite with diam(P)≤1. For 0<ε<1, let 𝒩ε(P) denote the number of ordered pairs at distance at most ε, including the diagonal, and let 𝒜ε(P) denote the number of ordered pairs at distance at least 1−ε. We prove the sharp bound 𝒩ε(P)≳d ε(d−1)/2𝒜ε(P) conjectured by Steinerberger (2025). More generally, the same inequality holds for finite positive Borel measures. The main input is a uniform L2 estimate, at cap thickness comparable to lattice spacing, for a supporting-direction incidence operator. In gnomonic coordinates, this operator is controlled by an incidence estimate for small Fenchel--Young gaps.

Related

  1. A sharp minimum for cube-apex bodies in every dimension
    Hanyue Shen, Pavel B. Dubovski
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textGeometry & topologyarXiv
  2. Sharp Edge-Edit Bounds at Every Level for Leaky Positive Semidefinite Forcing
    Domenico Frijio
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textCombinatorics & discrete mathematicsarXiv
  3. Sharp dimension bounds for right-angled hyperbolic polytopes
    Alexander Kolpakov
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textGeometry & topologyarXiv
  4. Sharp discrete Hardy constants in dimensions three and four and strict upper bounds from dimension nine
    Carlos Lizama
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textAnalysis & PDEsarXiv
  5. Dimension Changes the Scale-Signal Channel in Nearest-Neighbor Two-Sample Testing
    Hao Chen
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textStatisticsarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{korsky2026sharp,
  title = {{Sharp Antipode-Neighbor Bounds in Every Dimension}},
  author = {Samuel Korsky},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2610.14037},
  eprint = {2610.14037},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.14037},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Sharp Antipode-Neighbor Bounds in Every Dimension
AU  - Samuel Korsky
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/02
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2610.14037
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.14037
AB  - Let P⊂ℝ^d be finite with diam(P)≤1. For 0<ε<1, let 𝒩_ε(P) denote the number of ordered pairs at distance at most ε, including the diagonal, and let 𝒜_ε(P) denote the number of ordered pairs at distance at least 1−ε. We prove the sharp bound 𝒩_ε(P)≳_d ε^(d−1)/2𝒜_ε(P) conjectured by Steinerberger (2025). More generally, the same inequality holds for finite positive Borel measures. The main input is a uniform L^2 estimate, at cap thickness comparable to lattice spacing, for a supporting-direction incidence operator. In gnomonic coordinates, this operator is controlled by an incidence estimate for small Fenchel--Young gaps.
ER  -