Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
190,332 studies31 sourcesUpdated 2 min ago
PreprintarXiv licencearXiv

Sharp Edge-Edit Bounds at Every Level for Leaky Positive Semidefinite Forcing

Abstract

This work disproves the 1-leaky positive semidefinite edge-deletion conjecture and replaces it with a sharp theorem. For every leak level ℓ and edge e, one has |Z+(ℓ)(G)−Z+(ℓ)(G−e)|≤ 2. More generally, if two graphs differ only on edges with both endpoints in S, their parameters differ by at most |S|. An endpoint-sensitive refinement recovers an increase of at most one whenever some minimum set for G−e contains an endpoint of e. Both signs are sharp for every positive leak level. Joining two copies of Kℓ+1 by a bridge gives Z+(ℓ)(G)=2ℓ and Z+(ℓ)(G−e)=2ℓ+2. For every ℓ≥ 2, a connected clique-leaf pair of order 2ℓ+3 gives the opposite difference. The remaining positive-difference one-leak case is attained by connected graphs on nine vertices with Z+(1)(H)=4 and Z+(1)(G)=6. Explicit forcing sequences, fort certificates, and an exact verifier check the finite extremal example and stress-test the general results.

Related

  1. On Completely Positive and Semidefinite Programs for Moment Bounds on Maximum of Random Quadratics
    Buse Unluturk, Divya Padmanabhan, Karthik Natarajan
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textOptimisation & controlarXiv
  2. Sharp Antipode-Neighbor Bounds in Every Dimension
    Samuel Korsky
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textCombinatorics & discrete mathematicsGeometry & topologyarXiv
  3. Bricks in which every vertex is incident with a forcing edge
    Xinyu Dai, Fuliang Lu, Yaxian Zhang
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textCombinatorics & discrete mathematicsarXiv
  4. Near-bipartite bricks in which every b-invariant edge is a forcing edge
    Yaxian Zhang, Fuliang Lu
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textCombinatorics & discrete mathematicsarXiv
  5. Bounds on the Semidefinite Programming Complexity of the Euclidean Ball
    Guanxi Li, Kevin Shu
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textOptimisation & controlarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{frijio2026sharp,
  title = {{Sharp Edge-Edit Bounds at Every Level for Leaky Positive Semidefinite Forcing}},
  author = {Domenico Frijio},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2609.22804},
  eprint = {2609.22804},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.22804},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Sharp Edge-Edit Bounds at Every Level for Leaky Positive Semidefinite Forcing
AU  - Domenico Frijio
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/19
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2609.22804
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.22804
AB  - This work disproves the 1-leaky positive semidefinite edge-deletion conjecture and replaces it with a sharp theorem. For every leak level ℓ and edge e, one has |Z^+_(ℓ)(G)−Z^+_(ℓ)(G−e)|≤ 2. More generally, if two graphs differ only on edges with both endpoints in S, their parameters differ by at most |S|. An endpoint-sensitive refinement recovers an increase of at most one whenever some minimum set for G−e contains an endpoint of e. Both signs are sharp for every positive leak level. Joining two copies of K_ℓ+1 by a bridge gives Z^+_(ℓ)(G)=2ℓ and Z^+_(ℓ)(G−e)=2ℓ+2. For every ℓ≥ 2, a connected clique-leaf pair of order 2ℓ+3 gives the opposite difference. The remaining positive-difference one-leak case is attained by connected graphs on nine vertices with Z^+_(1)(H)=4 and Z^+_(1)(G)=6. Explicit forcing sequences, fort certificates, and an exact verifier check the finite extremal example and stress-test the general results.
ER  -