Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,768 studies31 sourcesUpdated 43 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY-NC 4.0The European Journal of Public Health

Personalised cardiovascular prevention in primary care: feasibility results from the FitPreV trial

Abstract

Background: Cardiovascular disease prevention requires strategies for individuals at elevated metabolic risk. Polygenic risk scores (PRS) may refine risk stratification, while wearable health devices (WHDs) may support lifestyle change through self-monitoring. FitPreV assessed the feasibility and acceptability of integrating PRS-based risk communication and WHD-supported behavioural monitoring into primary cardiovascular prevention within the Italian NHS.

Methods: FitPreV (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06911294) is a pilot RCT conducted in seven general practices in Rome. Adults aged 40–69 with metabolic syndrome and 10-year cardiovascular risk of 2.5–10% were randomized to standard counselling, WHD-supported, PRS-informed, or combined intervention. Feasibility was assessed through recruitment, retention and eCRF completeness. Acceptability, participant-reported outcomes, blood tests and clinical measurements were evaluated at 12 months.

Results: Of 160 eligible individuals, 120 were enrolled (recruitment rate of 75%). Overall, 82 participants completed follow-up, resulting in a retention rate of 68.3%, while eCRF completeness exceeded 90%. PRS disclosure was well accepted: 58.5% reported no anxiety, and 70.7% stated that PRS information motivated preventive behaviours. WHD use was well tolerated, with 56.4% reporting use for ≥9 months. GP acceptability was high, with 89% considering PRS integrable into practice, although self-efficacy in using PRS remained limited. Participants reported improved lifestyle behaviours, with no significant differences across arms.

Conclusions: FitPreV suggests that integrating PRS-informed risk communication and WHD-supported self-monitoring into primary cardiovascular prevention is feasible and acceptable. These findings support a definitive trial and highlight the need to strengthen providers’ confidence in using innovative prevention tools.

Funding: Next Generation EU, Italian Ministry of University and Research (grant no. P20229BC5H).

Key messages: • Personalised cardiovascular prevention using polygenic risk scores and wearable devices can be feasibly integrated into routine primary care.

• Before wider health-system adoption, a definitive trial is needed with stronger strategies to improve participant retention.

Related

  1. Lipoprotein(a) as a cardiovascular risk accelerator in primary prevention: Age-equivalent risk and event-free survival at 10 years in the UK biobank
    Arturo Cesaro, Oveis Jamialahmadi, Nicola Pugliese +5
    American journal of preventive cardiologyPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  2. Comparative effectiveness of lipid-lowering therapies for primary cardiovascular prevention: a network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
    Mirudhula Gnanavelou, Glenn Jun Kit Ho, Cheng Han Ng +16
    eClinicalMedicinePeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Surgery & anaesthesiaCrossref
  3. Cost-effectiveness of statin-based primary prevention of cardiovascular disease with electronic pillboxes for people with HIV in China
    Yuxuan Li, Wanqing Huang, Lili Cui +4
    BMC Health Services ResearchPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textCardiovascular medicinePMC
  4. Time-to-Statin Prescription for Primary Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease Prevention in a Lung Cancer Screening Program in Missouri: A Retrospective Cohort Study
    I. Che Ngang, E. K. Zewde, S. Gopalsamy Ramaswamy +3
    medRxivPreprintCC BY-NC-NDFull textCardiovascular medicinemedRxiv
  5. Development and internal validation of a 5-year major cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events prediction model using a simplified carotid plaque score in a hospital-based primary-prevention cohort
    Haitao Hu, Daoyan Li, Qian Zhang
    Frontiers in Cardiovascular MedicinePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textCardiovascular medicineCrossref
BibTeX
@article{cuoco2026personalised,
  title = {{Personalised cardiovascular prevention in primary care: feasibility results from the FitPreV trial}},
  author = {F L Cuoco and S A Sottile and A N Romano and M F Cuoco and L E Terenzi and T I Pasciuto and C H De Waure and S T Boccia and R O Pastorino},
  journal = {The European Journal of Public Health},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.1093/eurpub/ckag169.1111},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckag169.1111},
  note = {CC BY-NC 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Personalised cardiovascular prevention in primary care: feasibility results from the FitPreV trial
AU  - F L Cuoco
AU  - S A Sottile
AU  - A N Romano
AU  - M F Cuoco
AU  - L E Terenzi
AU  - T I Pasciuto
AU  - C H De Waure
AU  - S T Boccia
AU  - R O Pastorino
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/01
JO  - The European Journal of Public Health
DO  - 10.1093/eurpub/ckag169.1111
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckag169.1111
AB  - Background: Cardiovascular disease prevention requires strategies for individuals at elevated metabolic risk. Polygenic risk scores (PRS) may refine risk stratification, while wearable health devices (WHDs) may support lifestyle change through self-monitoring. FitPreV assessed the feasibility and acceptability of integrating PRS-based risk communication and WHD-supported behavioural monitoring into primary cardiovascular prevention within the Italian NHS.  Methods: FitPreV (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06911294) is a pilot RCT conducted in seven general practices in Rome. Adults aged 40–69 with metabolic syndrome and 10-year cardiovascular risk of 2.5–10% were randomized to standard counselling, WHD-supported, PRS-informed, or combined intervention. Feasibility was assessed through recruitment, retention and eCRF completeness. Acceptability, participant-reported outcomes, blood tests and clinical measurements were evaluated at 12 months.  Results: Of 160 eligible individuals, 120 were enrolled (recruitment rate of 75%). Overall, 82 participants completed follow-up, resulting in a retention rate of 68.3%, while eCRF completeness exceeded 90%. PRS disclosure was well accepted: 58.5% reported no anxiety, and 70.7% stated that PRS information motivated preventive behaviours. WHD use was well tolerated, with 56.4% reporting use for ≥9 months. GP acceptability was high, with 89% considering PRS integrable into practice, although self-efficacy in using PRS remained limited. Participants reported improved lifestyle behaviours, with no significant differences across arms.  Conclusions: FitPreV suggests that integrating PRS-informed risk communication and WHD-supported self-monitoring into primary cardiovascular prevention is feasible and acceptable. These findings support a definitive trial and highlight the need to strengthen providers’ confidence in using innovative prevention tools.  Funding: Next Generation EU, Italian Ministry of University and Research (grant no. P20229BC5H).  Key messages: • Personalised cardiovascular prevention using polygenic risk scores and wearable devices can be feasibly integrated into routine primary care.  • Before wider health-system adoption, a definitive trial is needed with stronger strategies to improve participant retention.
SN  - 1101-1262
SN  - 1464-360X
ER  -