Cost-effectiveness of statin-based primary prevention of cardiovascular disease with electronic pillboxes for people with HIV in China
11 affiliations
- 1China-Australia Joint Research Center for Infectious Diseases, School of Public Health, Xi’an Jiaotong University Health Science Center, Xi’an, Shaanxi 710061 China
- 2Acacia Lab for Implementation Science, School of Health Management, Southern Medical University, 1023-1063, South Shatai Road, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510515 China
- 3West China Hospital Endocrinology and Metabolism Department, West China School of Nursing, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041 China
- 4Dermatology Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China
- 5Center for World Health Organization Studies, School of Health Management, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong China
- 6Microbiome Medicine Center, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China
- 7Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Shenzhen Hospital, Southern Medical University, Shenzhen, China
- 8Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Laboratory Medicine, Guangzhou, China
- 9State Key Laboratory of Multi-organ Injury Prevention and Treatment, Guangzhou, China
- 10Microbiome Medicine Center, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, 1333 Xinhu Road, Bao’an District, Shenzhen, 518000 China
- 11Shenzhen Hospital of Southern Medical University, 1333 Xinhu Road, Bao’an District, Shenzhen, Guangdong 518000 China
Abstract
Objectives: Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading non-AIDS cause of death among people with HIV (PWH). Although statins reduce CVD risk by over one-third, poor adherence limits real-world effectiveness. Electronic pillboxes may bridge this gap, but their cost-effectiveness for CVD primary prevention in PWH remains unclear.
Methods: We developed a Markov cohort model simulating 100,000 Chinese PWH (aged 40–75 years) over a lifetime horizon from a healthcare system perspective. Strategies varied by CVD screening frequency (every 6/12/24 months), lipid-lowering regimens (pitavastatin alone, or combined with ezetimibe or PCSK9 inhibitor), and electronic pillbox adherence support for high-risk individuals. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were calculated as cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained versus status quo at willingness-to-pay thresholds of 1 × and 3 × GDP per capita ($13,445 and $40,335) in China.
Results: Risk-stratified screening every 24 months with pitavastatin alone (without pillboxes) was optimal at 1×GDP per capita (ICER $8,269/QALY), averting 4,298 major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and gaining 28,570 QALYs versus status quo. At 3×GDP per capita, 6-monthly screening with risk-tailored therapy (pitavastatin ± ezetimibe) plus electronic pillboxes was optimal (ICER $16,799/QALY), averting 10,169 MACE and gaining 59,125 QALYs. Statin adherence and ezetimibe cost were key drivers of cost-effectiveness.
Conclusions: Risk-stratified CVD prevention integrating periodic screening and tailored pharmacotherapy is cost-effective for PWH in China. Electronic pillboxes become cost-effective when greater healthcare investment is available, supporting a threshold-dependent approach to translating statin efficacy into population-level impact.
Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-026-15173-y.
Related
- Comparative effectiveness of lipid-lowering therapies for primary cardiovascular prevention: a network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
- Lipoprotein(a) as a cardiovascular risk accelerator in primary prevention: Age-equivalent risk and event-free survival at 10 years in the UK biobank
- Effectiveness and implementation of electronic decision support for adult vaccination in primary care: a mixed-methods quasi-experimental evaluation
- Time-to-Statin Prescription for Primary Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease Prevention in a Lung Cancer Screening Program in Missouri: A Retrospective Cohort Study
- Personalised cardiovascular prevention in primary care: feasibility results from the FitPreV trial
BibTeX
@article{li2026costeffectiveness,
title = {{Cost-effectiveness of statin-based primary prevention of cardiovascular disease with electronic pillboxes for people with HIV in China}},
author = {Yuxuan Li and Wanqing Huang and Lili Cui and Dongmei Zhong and Dong Roman Xu and Hongwei Zhou and Rui Zhao},
journal = {BMC Health Services Research},
year = {2026},
month = aug,
doi = {10.1186/s12913-026-15173-y},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-026-15173-y},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Cost-effectiveness of statin-based primary prevention of cardiovascular disease with electronic pillboxes for people with HIV in China
AU - Yuxuan Li
AU - Wanqing Huang
AU - Lili Cui
AU - Dongmei Zhong
AU - Dong Roman Xu
AU - Hongwei Zhou
AU - Rui Zhao
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/08/04
JO - BMC Health Services Research
DO - 10.1186/s12913-026-15173-y
UR - https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-026-15173-y
AB - Objectives: Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading non-AIDS cause of death among people with HIV (PWH). Although statins reduce CVD risk by over one-third, poor adherence limits real-world effectiveness. Electronic pillboxes may bridge this gap, but their cost-effectiveness for CVD primary prevention in PWH remains unclear. Methods: We developed a Markov cohort model simulating 100,000 Chinese PWH (aged 40–75 years) over a lifetime horizon from a healthcare system perspective. Strategies varied by CVD screening frequency (every 6/12/24 months), lipid-lowering regimens (pitavastatin alone, or combined with ezetimibe or PCSK9 inhibitor), and electronic pillbox adherence support for high-risk individuals. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were calculated as cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained versus status quo at willingness-to-pay thresholds of 1 × and 3 × GDP per capita ($13,445 and $40,335) in China. Results: Risk-stratified screening every 24 months with pitavastatin alone (without pillboxes) was optimal at 1×GDP per capita (ICER $8,269/QALY), averting 4,298 major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and gaining 28,570 QALYs versus status quo. At 3×GDP per capita, 6-monthly screening with risk-tailored therapy (pitavastatin ± ezetimibe) plus electronic pillboxes was optimal (ICER $16,799/QALY), averting 10,169 MACE and gaining 59,125 QALYs. Statin adherence and ezetimibe cost were key drivers of cost-effectiveness. Conclusions: Risk-stratified CVD prevention integrating periodic screening and tailored pharmacotherapy is cost-effective for PWH in China. Electronic pillboxes become cost-effective when greater healthcare investment is available, supporting a threshold-dependent approach to translating statin efficacy into population-level impact. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-026-15173-y.
SN - 1472-6963
ER -