Planning while moving: when two hands are better than one
Abstract
Humans routinely prepare their next movement while performing the current one. Because accumulating evidence suggests that movement planning and execution depend on partially overlapping neural substrates, this study examined whether motor preparation is as efficient when a limb is in motion as compared to static. In Experiment 1 (12 females, 12 males), participants performed a two-choice reaction time (RT) task in which they initiated a leftward or rightward reach following the appearance of a visual target. On some trials, the upcoming target direction was precued a few seconds in advance. When the hand was at rest, the directional precue reduced RTs by 44ms, indicating effective preprogramming of the reaching movement. Interestingly, when the same hand was producing a rhythmic movement, the precue only reduced RTs by 16ms, suggesting interference. In Experiment 2 (13 females, 11 males), the same task was performed with the exception that the rhythmic movement was performed with the contralateral hand. Under these conditions, the benefit of the precue remained strong (37ms), suggesting that the interference arose from hemisphere-dependent competition rather than general attentional or biomechanical factors. Taken together, these findings constrain the behavioral conditions under which ongoing execution interferes with planning a forthcoming action while highlighting a fundamental limit in the brain’s capacity for parallel motor control. We propose that planning and execution compete for neural resources within the same hemisphere, revealing a form of motoric bottleneck whose strength depends upon the degree of overlap between neural populations engaged by the ongoing and upcoming actions.
Significance statement Many activities such as playing an instrument or typing require preparing a movement while one is ongoing. This study investigated the efficiency with which an action can be planned when the same limb is already moving. Using a reach reaction time task with directional precues, we found that advance information sped up responses when the hand was stationary but much less so when that hand was already moving. Notably, this interference was greatly reduced when reach planning and background movement were distributed across hands. These results are consistent with a hemisphere-dependent motoric bottleneck and open up the possibility that the balance between ongoing execution and upcoming preparation is constrained by the degree of overlap in neural representation.
Related
- City-specific or generalisable resistances? An urban animal connectivity model performs better when parameterised from two cities
- Better together? Microbial communities associated with enhanced growth of the invasive seagrass Halophila stipulacea when mixed with a native Mediterranean seagrass Cymodocea nodosa
- Learned Visual Relevance Shapes Perceptual Inference: Evidence from Eyes to Hands
- Better antibodies, better science
- Trait anxiety selectively amplifies reward learning under uncertainty, while N3 sleep attenuates it
BibTeX
@article{danion2026planning,
title = {{Planning while moving: when two hands are better than one}},
author = {Frederic R. Danion and Adrien Coudiere and Hugo Leblan-Falzone and Lucette Toussaint and Pierre-Michel Bernier},
journal = {eneuro},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.1523/eneuro.0255-26.2026},
url = {https://www.eneuro.org/lookup/doi/10.1523/ENEURO.0255-26.2026},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Planning while moving: when two hands are better than one
AU - Frederic R. Danion
AU - Adrien Coudiere
AU - Hugo Leblan-Falzone
AU - Lucette Toussaint
AU - Pierre-Michel Bernier
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/30
JO - eneuro
DO - 10.1523/eneuro.0255-26.2026
UR - https://www.eneuro.org/lookup/doi/10.1523/ENEURO.0255-26.2026
AB - Humans routinely prepare their next movement while performing the current one. Because accumulating evidence suggests that movement planning and execution depend on partially overlapping neural substrates, this study examined whether motor preparation is as efficient when a limb is in motion as compared to static. In Experiment 1 (12 females, 12 males), participants performed a two-choice reaction time (RT) task in which they initiated a leftward or rightward reach following the appearance of a visual target. On some trials, the upcoming target direction was precued a few seconds in advance. When the hand was at rest, the directional precue reduced RTs by 44ms, indicating effective preprogramming of the reaching movement. Interestingly, when the same hand was producing a rhythmic movement, the precue only reduced RTs by 16ms, suggesting interference. In Experiment 2 (13 females, 11 males), the same task was performed with the exception that the rhythmic movement was performed with the contralateral hand. Under these conditions, the benefit of the precue remained strong (37ms), suggesting that the interference arose from hemisphere-dependent competition rather than general attentional or biomechanical factors. Taken together, these findings constrain the behavioral conditions under which ongoing execution interferes with planning a forthcoming action while highlighting a fundamental limit in the brain’s capacity for parallel motor control. We propose that planning and execution compete for neural resources within the same hemisphere, revealing a form of motoric bottleneck whose strength depends upon the degree of overlap between neural populations engaged by the ongoing and upcoming actions. Significance statement Many activities such as playing an instrument or typing require preparing a movement while one is ongoing. This study investigated the efficiency with which an action can be planned when the same limb is already moving. Using a reach reaction time task with directional precues, we found that advance information sped up responses when the hand was stationary but much less so when that hand was already moving. Notably, this interference was greatly reduced when reach planning and background movement were distributed across hands. These results are consistent with a hemisphere-dependent motoric bottleneck and open up the possibility that the balance between ongoing execution and upcoming preparation is constrained by the degree of overlap in neural representation.
SN - 2373-2822
ER -