Fatigue Crack Growth in Rubber: Comparability of Test Results, Material Effects and Transfer to Component Life—A Critical Review
- 1Sustainable Materials R&D Center, Korea Automotive Technology Institute, 303 Pungse-ro, Pungse-myeon, Dongnam-gu, Cheonan-si 31214, Chungnam, Republic of Korea
Abstract
Fatigue crack growth (FCG) relations rank rubber compounds and predict component life, yet a reported rate–tearing-energy curve depends on how it was measured as well as on the compound. This critical review treats the test variables as criteria for deciding whether two results may be compared. Specimen geometry, energy accounting, load minimum, frequency, waveform, specimen temperature, crack preparation, imaging, rate extraction and data independence shape the measured response. A two-stage, seven-item checklist and an eight-domain minimum reporting set are proposed, and the evidence on backbone, filler, cure system, temperature, ageing and chemical environment, graded by strength, is read against them. Formulation rankings hold only within matched test conditions: when compounds differ in exponent, the power-law curves cross, and rankings can reverse within or beyond the tested energy range. Where exponents were reported for both, natural rubber mostly showed a lower exponent than styrene–butadiene rubber, but the backbone was not isolated and exponent values differ between programmes. Component transfer requires geometry-specific crack-driving histories, defect criteria, thermal and load histories, and independent validation. Quantitative comparison needs a shared endpoint and energy convention, with other items matched or bounded by measurement; a single-compound inter-laboratory round-robin would test the checklist.
Related
- ANN-based prediction of torsional fatigue behavior in an injection-molded compliant mechanism component
- Slip casting and stress-controlled co-sintering of a complex ceramic Al₂O₃–ZrO₂/Al₂O₃ bi-material component through bevelled interface design for electromagnetic applications
- Single-component dual emission and full-spectrum color tuning from through-space charge transfer in asymmetric [2.2]paracyclophanes
- Metal-organic frameworks for catalytic degradation of emerging dye contaminants in wastewater: A critical review of material design, reaction mechanisms, and engineering application
- Next Generation NPK Slow Release Hydrogel Fertilizers: A Critical Review of Material Design, Performance, and Field Translation
BibTeX
@article{yoon2026fatigue,
title = {{Fatigue Crack Growth in Rubber: Comparability of Test Results, Material Effects and Transfer to Component Life—A Critical Review}},
author = {Jeong-Hwan Yoon and Kyoung-Ho Shin and Ye-Won Park and Yeon-Jee Cho},
journal = {Polymers},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.3390/polym18202476},
url = {https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4360/18/20/2476},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Fatigue Crack Growth in Rubber: Comparability of Test Results, Material Effects and Transfer to Component Life—A Critical Review
AU - Jeong-Hwan Yoon
AU - Kyoung-Ho Shin
AU - Ye-Won Park
AU - Yeon-Jee Cho
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/10
JO - Polymers
DO - 10.3390/polym18202476
UR - https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4360/18/20/2476
AB - Fatigue crack growth (FCG) relations rank rubber compounds and predict component life, yet a reported rate–tearing-energy curve depends on how it was measured as well as on the compound. This critical review treats the test variables as criteria for deciding whether two results may be compared. Specimen geometry, energy accounting, load minimum, frequency, waveform, specimen temperature, crack preparation, imaging, rate extraction and data independence shape the measured response. A two-stage, seven-item checklist and an eight-domain minimum reporting set are proposed, and the evidence on backbone, filler, cure system, temperature, ageing and chemical environment, graded by strength, is read against them. Formulation rankings hold only within matched test conditions: when compounds differ in exponent, the power-law curves cross, and rankings can reverse within or beyond the tested energy range. Where exponents were reported for both, natural rubber mostly showed a lower exponent than styrene–butadiene rubber, but the backbone was not isolated and exponent values differ between programmes. Component transfer requires geometry-specific crack-driving histories, defect criteria, thermal and load histories, and independent validation. Quantitative comparison needs a shared endpoint and energy convention, with other items matched or bounded by measurement; a single-compound inter-laboratory round-robin would test the checklist.
SN - 2073-4360
ER -