Characteristics of junior residents choosing alternative career pathways without entering traditional specialty residency programs: An exploratory descriptive study
- 1Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University, Osaka, Japan
- 2Department of General Practice, Osaka Healthcare Clinic, Osaka, Japan
Abstract
Objectives: In Japan, the standard post-training trajectory for physicians involves entering a specialty residency program to obtain board certification. However, a growing number of recent graduates are opting for alternative career pathways immediately following their two-year mandatory postgraduate clinical training. This study aimed to identify the clinical evaluation scores and baseline backgrounds of junior residents who choose these alternative career paths.
Methods: This retrospective, longitudinal, descriptive study assessed 222 postgraduate year 1 (PGY1) residents during their mandatory emergency medicine (EM) rotations at an academic university hospital from fiscal years 2019 to 2024 (April 2019 to March 2025). Residents were evaluated using a standardized three-item survey based on the national E-POrtfolio of Clinical training for PostGraduates (PG-EPOC) rubrics, measuring Clinical Attitude, Knowledge and Skills, and Positive Participation. Participants were divided into the Traditional Specialty Residency Pathway Group (n=212) and the Alternative Career Pathway Group (n=10).
Results: Ten residents (4.5%) chose an alternative career pathway. This group demonstrated significantly lower scores across all three clinical assessment domains during their EM rotation compared to the traditional residency group (Total survey score mean: 2.79 vs. 3.61, P=0.0105). In univariable logistic regression analysis, lower scores on the clinical evaluation survey and graduation from a public university were significantly associated with selecting an alternative career pathway.
Conclusion: Junior residents who bypass traditional specialty residency programs exhibit lower clinical performance and engagement scores during their initial training. Early standardized clinical assessments and distinct educational backgrounds may serve as neutral indicators for identifying residents who require enhanced career counseling or educational support during their postgraduate transition.
Related
- Psychosocial predictors and justification patterns of traditional and alternative medicine in Peru
- Training and Assessment of Non-Technical Human Factor Skills Among Anesthesiology Residents: An Exploratory Educational Quality Improvement Initiative.
- Can GPT Be Used as an Alternative Prediction Model to Traditional Machine Learning and Neural Networks on Low-Volume Clinical Data?
- Low-Intensity Continuous Ultrasound vs. Traditional Ultrasound: A Systematic Review and Descriptive Analysis on Past and Future Gold Standards for Deep-Tissue Diathermy in Clinical Medicine.
- Monitoring of palliative care outcomes for nursing home residents with dementia: a secondary exploratory analysis of monthly recurrent deterioration data
BibTeX
@article{ota2026characteristics,
title = {{Characteristics of junior residents choosing alternative career pathways without entering traditional specialty residency programs: An exploratory descriptive study}},
author = {Koshi Ota and Kanna Ota},
journal = {SAGE Open Medicine},
year = {2026},
month = sep,
doi = {10.1177/20503121261491925},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1177/20503121261491925},
note = {CC BY-NC 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Characteristics of junior residents choosing alternative career pathways without entering traditional specialty residency programs: An exploratory descriptive study
AU - Koshi Ota
AU - Kanna Ota
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/09/21
JO - SAGE Open Medicine
DO - 10.1177/20503121261491925
UR - https://doi.org/10.1177/20503121261491925
AB - Objectives: In Japan, the standard post-training trajectory for physicians involves entering a specialty residency program to obtain board certification. However, a growing number of recent graduates are opting for alternative career pathways immediately following their two-year mandatory postgraduate clinical training. This study aimed to identify the clinical evaluation scores and baseline backgrounds of junior residents who choose these alternative career paths. Methods: This retrospective, longitudinal, descriptive study assessed 222 postgraduate year 1 (PGY1) residents during their mandatory emergency medicine (EM) rotations at an academic university hospital from fiscal years 2019 to 2024 (April 2019 to March 2025). Residents were evaluated using a standardized three-item survey based on the national E-POrtfolio of Clinical training for PostGraduates (PG-EPOC) rubrics, measuring Clinical Attitude, Knowledge and Skills, and Positive Participation. Participants were divided into the Traditional Specialty Residency Pathway Group (n=212) and the Alternative Career Pathway Group (n=10). Results: Ten residents (4.5%) chose an alternative career pathway. This group demonstrated significantly lower scores across all three clinical assessment domains during their EM rotation compared to the traditional residency group (Total survey score mean: 2.79 vs. 3.61, P=0.0105). In univariable logistic regression analysis, lower scores on the clinical evaluation survey and graduation from a public university were significantly associated with selecting an alternative career pathway. Conclusion: Junior residents who bypass traditional specialty residency programs exhibit lower clinical performance and engagement scores during their initial training. Early standardized clinical assessments and distinct educational backgrounds may serve as neutral indicators for identifying residents who require enhanced career counseling or educational support during their postgraduate transition.
SN - 2050-3121
ER -