Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 39 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY-NC-SAJournal of Indian Association of Public Health Dentistry

Understanding Dental Students’ Perspectives on Novel Caries Management Approaches in India: A Cross Sectional Study

Abstract

Aim and Background: The alternative caries management strategies are long advocated in the management of caries lesions due to their minimally invasive nature. However, the approach of dental students towards these techniques remains underexplored. Hence, the present study was conducted with an aim to assess awareness, attitude, and felt barriers among dental students toward alternative caries management strategies. Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted among 300 dental students, including BDS final year, interns, and postgraduate students. Study participants were selected using a probability proportional to size sampling technique. A 22-item questionnaire was prepared from the previously established literature. Face and content validity of the study tool was done by three subject experts using Lawshe’s index (CVI = 0.82). The questionnaires were sent to study participants through their registered email addresses and WhatsApp as a Google Form link. Chi-square test was used to find out the difference between the proportions, and ANOVA with post hoc analysis was applied to find the difference between mean awareness and attitude scores among the three study groups. Results: Most of the study participants (65%) were aware about these techniques. Almost half of the study participants stated that alternate/novel techniques can be used among noncooperative patients (58%), in case of lack of infrastructure (60.66%) for elaborated procedures, and for elders (70.67%). Whereas most among the study participants opined that these techniques do not restore form and function of the tooth (60%) and will affect their practices adversely (73%). Although believed that these procedures are time saving (93%), less costly (93%), and have more patient cooperation (95%). Felt barriers included lack of training (63%), patient acceptance (51%), unpredictability of outcome (54%), and chances of failure (62%). Conclusion: Postgraduates exhibited significantly higher knowledge and acceptance compared to BDS final year and interns. However, the considerable knowledge gaps among less experienced participants emphasize the need for targeted educational interventions at the undergraduate and internship levels.

Related

  1. Academic Discipline, Self-Medication, and Medication-Related Behaviors in Premenstrual Symptom Management Among Female University Students: A Cross-Sectional Study.
    Olcay Kıroğlu, Havanur Güllü, Rozelin Aydın +1
    Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland)Peer-reviewedCC BYFull textEpidemiology & public healthEurope PMC
  2. Pharmacy students' knowledge and attitudes regarding GLP-1 receptor agonist adverse effects in obesity management: a cross-sectional study.
    Alaa A Khojah, Malaz J Gazzaz, Mohammed M Aldurdunji +6
    The Libyan journal of medicinePeer-reviewedCC BY-NCFull textPharmacology & toxicologyEurope PMC
  3. The importance of integrating evolutionary–developmental perspectives into One Health approaches
    Camryn Kritzell, Mary Ann Ottinger, Molly Albecker
    BiosciencePeer-reviewedLicence not statedFull text2 citedEpidemiology & public healthPMC
  4. Understanding participation and quality of life of university students with probable DCD using structural equation modeling
    Brazilian journal of physical therapyPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  5. Understanding ChatGPT adoption among medical students: an integrated theoretical model of psychological barriers and individual factors
    Ayoob Lone, Ali Saleh Alshebami, Imtiyaz Ahmad Dar +1
    Frontiers in medicinePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
BibTeX
@article{sabbarwal2026understanding,
  title = {{Understanding Dental Students’ Perspectives on Novel Caries Management Approaches in India: A Cross Sectional Study}},
  author = {Bhavna Sabbarwal and Ankita Sharma and Ruchi Singhal and Ritu Namdev and Neha Sikka},
  journal = {Journal of Indian Association of Public Health Dentistry},
  year = {2026},
  month = jul,
  doi = {10.4103/jiaphd.jiaphd_281_25},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.4103/jiaphd.jiaphd_281_25},
  note = {CC BY-NC-SA},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Understanding Dental Students’ Perspectives on Novel Caries Management Approaches in India: A Cross Sectional Study
AU  - Bhavna Sabbarwal
AU  - Ankita Sharma
AU  - Ruchi Singhal
AU  - Ritu Namdev
AU  - Neha Sikka
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/07/01
JO  - Journal of Indian Association of Public Health Dentistry
DO  - 10.4103/jiaphd.jiaphd_281_25
UR  - https://doi.org/10.4103/jiaphd.jiaphd_281_25
AB  - Aim and Background: The alternative caries management strategies are long advocated in the management of caries lesions due to their minimally invasive nature. However, the approach of dental students towards these techniques remains underexplored. Hence, the present study was conducted with an aim to assess awareness, attitude, and felt barriers among dental students toward alternative caries management strategies. Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted among 300 dental students, including BDS final year, interns, and postgraduate students. Study participants were selected using a probability proportional to size sampling technique. A 22-item questionnaire was prepared from the previously established literature. Face and content validity of the study tool was done by three subject experts using Lawshe’s index (CVI = 0.82). The questionnaires were sent to study participants through their registered email addresses and WhatsApp as a Google Form link. Chi-square test was used to find out the difference between the proportions, and ANOVA with post hoc analysis was applied to find the difference between mean awareness and attitude scores among the three study groups. Results: Most of the study participants (65%) were aware about these techniques. Almost half of the study participants stated that alternate/novel techniques can be used among noncooperative patients (58%), in case of lack of infrastructure (60.66%) for elaborated procedures, and for elders (70.67%). Whereas most among the study participants opined that these techniques do not restore form and function of the tooth (60%) and will affect their practices adversely (73%). Although believed that these procedures are time saving (93%), less costly (93%), and have more patient cooperation (95%). Felt barriers included lack of training (63%), patient acceptance (51%), unpredictability of outcome (54%), and chances of failure (62%). Conclusion: Postgraduates exhibited significantly higher knowledge and acceptance compared to BDS final year and interns. However, the considerable knowledge gaps among less experienced participants emphasize the need for targeted educational interventions at the undergraduate and internship levels.
SN  - 2319-5932
SN  - 2350-0484
ER  -