Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 37 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BYDigital Health

AI literacy as a core competency for health professionals: A consolidated framework for implementation research (CFIR)-Informed perspective

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly transforming health practice through applications in clinical decision support, diagnostics, population health, and health system management. Yet, most health professionals lack formal training and understanding of AI concepts, as well as the critical appraisal of algorithmic outputs. This gap between technological adoption and workforce preparedness raises concerns about patient safety, ethical decision-making, and the quality of care, particularly due to overreliance on automated recommendations, limited recognition of bias, and inadequate understanding of model uncertainty. AI literacy has therefore become a critical competency for safe and effective participation in AI-enabled health systems. However, translating this need into sustained educational and professional practice requires attention to the multi-level determinants of implementation. This perspective article applies the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) to conceptualize AI literacy as an educational intervention and maps barriers and facilitators across intervention characteristics, inner and outer settings, individual attributes, and implementation processes. Building on this analysis, the article proposes strategies for integrating AI literacy through competency-based curriculum design, experiential and interprofessional learning, faculty development, performance-based assessment, and alignment with accreditation and continuing professional development structures. Positioning AI literacy as a core professional competency is essential to maintaining human oversight, supporting ethical AI use, and safeguarding patient-centered care in increasingly technology-mediated health environments.

Related

  1. Parental perceptions of childhood anxiety and mental health support needs in Czechia using the consolidated framework for implementation research
    Marie Polášková, Marta Fišerová, Anna Kågström
    BMC Public HealthPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Epidemiology & public healthCrossref
  2. Evaluating the digital dispensation of HIV self-testing (HIVST) among men who have sex with men (MSM) in Pakistan: Seeing through the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) lens
    Usman Ali, Muhammad Safdar Kamal Pasha, Ramesh Kumar +3
    PLOS Global Public HealthPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textMicrobiologyNeurosciencePLOS
  3. Entrustable Professional Activities in Residency Training: A Qualitative Study on Trainees' Perceptions Using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research.
    Fabienne Schwitz, Vera Bissig, Monika Brodmann Maeder +1
    Perspectives on medical educationPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textEpidemiology & public healthEurope PMC
  4. Implementation factors of group antenatal care in low-resource settings in Tanzania: A qualitative study using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research
    Alen Kinyina, Augustino Hellar, Raymond Bandio +15
    PLOS Global Public HealthPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textObstetrics, gynaecology & paediatricsPLOS
  5. Implementation Experiences of a School-Based Adolescent Nutrition Education Intervention: A Post-Intervention Qualitative Study Guided by Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research and the Social Ecological Model
    Humaira Mahmood, Babar Tasneem Shaikh, Farrah Pervaiz +5
    NutrientsPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0NutritionCrossref
BibTeX
@article{eneh2026literacy,
  title = {{AI literacy as a core competency for health professionals: A consolidated framework for implementation research (CFIR)-Informed perspective}},
  author = {Stanley Chinedu Eneh and Yok-Fong Paat},
  journal = {Digital Health},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.1177/20552076261501479},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1177/20552076261501479},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - AI literacy as a core competency for health professionals: A consolidated framework for implementation research (CFIR)-Informed perspective
AU  - Stanley Chinedu Eneh
AU  - Yok-Fong Paat
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/23
JO  - Digital Health
DO  - 10.1177/20552076261501479
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1177/20552076261501479
AB  - Artificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly transforming health practice through applications in clinical decision support, diagnostics, population health, and health system management. Yet, most health professionals lack formal training and understanding of AI concepts, as well as the critical appraisal of algorithmic outputs. This gap between technological adoption and workforce preparedness raises concerns about patient safety, ethical decision-making, and the quality of care, particularly due to overreliance on automated recommendations, limited recognition of bias, and inadequate understanding of model uncertainty. AI literacy has therefore become a critical competency for safe and effective participation in AI-enabled health systems. However, translating this need into sustained educational and professional practice requires attention to the multi-level determinants of implementation. This perspective article applies the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) to conceptualize AI literacy as an educational intervention and maps barriers and facilitators across intervention characteristics, inner and outer settings, individual attributes, and implementation processes. Building on this analysis, the article proposes strategies for integrating AI literacy through competency-based curriculum design, experiential and interprofessional learning, faculty development, performance-based assessment, and alignment with accreditation and continuing professional development structures. Positioning AI literacy as a core professional competency is essential to maintaining human oversight, supporting ethical AI use, and safeguarding patient-centered care in increasingly technology-mediated health environments.
SN  - 2055-2076
ER  -