Implementation factors of group antenatal care in low-resource settings in Tanzania: A qualitative study using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research
6 affiliations
- 1Prime Health Initiative Tanzania (PHIT), Dar es salaam, Tanzania
- 2Ifakara Health Institute (IHI), Dar es salaam, Tanzania
- 3Ministry of Health, Dodoma, Tanzania
- 4East, Central, and Southern Africa Health Community (ECSA-HC), Arusha, Tanzania
- 5Ministry of Foreign Affairs and East African Co-operation, Dodoma, Tanzania
- 6Geita Regional Health Management Team (RHMT), Geita, Tanzania
Abstract
Antenatal care (ANC) is essential for improving maternal and newborn health, yet many women do not complete the recommended follow-up visits and often experience suboptimal quality of care and weak provider-client interactions. Group antenatal care (G-ANC) offers an alternative service delivery model that combines clinical assessments with group-based education, facilitated discussion, and peer support for women with similar gestational age (GA). This study examined the facilitators and barriers to G-ANC implementation in low-resource settings in Tanzania using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR).A qualitative study was conducted in the Geita Region from June to November 2024. Data were collected through Focus Group Discussions (FGDs) with pregnant and recently delivered women who participated in G-ANC. Key Informant Interviews (KIIs) included the healthcare providers (HCPs), facility leaders, and health managers. Using NVivo Version 14.0 software, we managed and analysed all interviews to explore facilitators and barriers to the implementation of G-ANC. Data were grouped and reported according to their relevance to the CFIR constructs. Implementation of G-ANC was shaped by interacting factors across all CFIR domains. Key facilitators included the perceived relative advantage of G-ANC over conventional ANC, adaptability of the model to local contexts, supportive facility leadership, effective teamwork, and peer support among women. Similarly, implementation processes such as proper scheduling of group sessions supported continuity of G-ANC services. In addition, the positive experiences of community health workers (CHWs), HCPs and pregnant women reinforced sustained implementation. Major barriers included inadequate space for meetings, workforce shortages, competing clinical demands, socioeconomic constraints and privacy concerns in group settings. Successful implementation of G-ANC in low-resource settings requires alignment between intervention design, health system capacity, and community context. Addressing multilevel barriers while strengthening identified facilitators is critical for the successful adoption of G-ANC and its integration into other maternal and newborn health services.
Related
- Implementation Experiences of a School-Based Adolescent Nutrition Education Intervention: A Post-Intervention Qualitative Study Guided by Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research and the Social Ecological Model
- Stakeholder perspectives on sustainable antenatal point-of-care ultrasound (APOCUS) implementation in rural Australia: a qualitative study of professional body submissions and clinician focus groups.
- Parental perceptions of childhood anxiety and mental health support needs in Czechia using the consolidated framework for implementation research
- AI literacy as a core competency for health professionals: A consolidated framework for implementation research (CFIR)-Informed perspective
- Evaluating the digital dispensation of HIV self-testing (HIVST) among men who have sex with men (MSM) in Pakistan: Seeing through the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) lens
BibTeX
@article{kinyina2026implementation,
title = {{Implementation factors of group antenatal care in low-resource settings in Tanzania: A qualitative study using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research}},
author = {Alen Kinyina and Augustino Hellar and Raymond Bandio and Hamid Mandali and Ahmad Makuwani and Phineas Sospeter and Jennie Jaribu and Isaac Lyatuu and Yusuph Kulindwa and Frank Phiri and Ntuli Kapologwe and Sarah Chamos and Cyprian Mtani and Wilfred Kafuku and Omari Sukari and Abubakari Munga and Husna Athumani and James Hellar},
journal = {PLOS Global Public Health},
year = {2026},
month = sep,
doi = {10.1371/journal.pgph.0006221},
url = {https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth/article?id=10.1371/journal.pgph.0006221},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Implementation factors of group antenatal care in low-resource settings in Tanzania: A qualitative study using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research
AU - Alen Kinyina
AU - Augustino Hellar
AU - Raymond Bandio
AU - Hamid Mandali
AU - Ahmad Makuwani
AU - Phineas Sospeter
AU - Jennie Jaribu
AU - Isaac Lyatuu
AU - Yusuph Kulindwa
AU - Frank Phiri
AU - Ntuli Kapologwe
AU - Sarah Chamos
AU - Cyprian Mtani
AU - Wilfred Kafuku
AU - Omari Sukari
AU - Abubakari Munga
AU - Husna Athumani
AU - James Hellar
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/09/18
JO - PLOS Global Public Health
DO - 10.1371/journal.pgph.0006221
UR - https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth/article?id=10.1371/journal.pgph.0006221
AB - Antenatal care (ANC) is essential for improving maternal and newborn health, yet many women do not complete the recommended follow-up visits and often experience suboptimal quality of care and weak provider-client interactions. Group antenatal care (G-ANC) offers an alternative service delivery model that combines clinical assessments with group-based education, facilitated discussion, and peer support for women with similar gestational age (GA). This study examined the facilitators and barriers to G-ANC implementation in low-resource settings in Tanzania using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR).A qualitative study was conducted in the Geita Region from June to November 2024. Data were collected through Focus Group Discussions (FGDs) with pregnant and recently delivered women who participated in G-ANC. Key Informant Interviews (KIIs) included the healthcare providers (HCPs), facility leaders, and health managers. Using NVivo Version 14.0 software, we managed and analysed all interviews to explore facilitators and barriers to the implementation of G-ANC. Data were grouped and reported according to their relevance to the CFIR constructs. Implementation of G-ANC was shaped by interacting factors across all CFIR domains. Key facilitators included the perceived relative advantage of G-ANC over conventional ANC, adaptability of the model to local contexts, supportive facility leadership, effective teamwork, and peer support among women. Similarly, implementation processes such as proper scheduling of group sessions supported continuity of G-ANC services. In addition, the positive experiences of community health workers (CHWs), HCPs and pregnant women reinforced sustained implementation. Major barriers included inadequate space for meetings, workforce shortages, competing clinical demands, socioeconomic constraints and privacy concerns in group settings. Successful implementation of G-ANC in low-resource settings requires alignment between intervention design, health system capacity, and community context. Addressing multilevel barriers while strengthening identified facilitators is critical for the successful adoption of G-ANC and its integration into other maternal and newborn health services.
SN - 2767-3375
ER -