Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
194,220 studies31 sourcesUpdated 18 min ago
PreprintCC0arXiv

Solar Capture Tests of Inelastic Dark Matter after the LZ High-Recoil Event

  1. 1Department of Physics , James-Franck-Str. 1 , 85748 Garching , Germany
  2. 2Technical University of Munich , TUM School of Natural Sciences ,

Abstract

The LUX-ZEPLIN (LZ) Collaboration has reported a $248$ keV nuclear-recoil candidate for which endothermic dark matter (DM) gives some of the largest local significances. We study Solar-capture constraints on three interpretations: a thermal Higgsino, a thermal pseudo-Dirac fermion with off-diagonal vector interactions, and neutron-philic endothermic spin-dependent scattering through 𝒪4. The canonical full-density thermal Higgsino is excluded: its LZ-preferred splitting near 0.38 MeV lies well below the splitting required to suppress Solar capture sufficiently to satisfy the IceCube upper limits on DM annihilation in the Sun, δ≳0.51-0.56 MeV. For the pseudo-Dirac benchmark parameters that fit the LZ event, we find C⊙=1.53×1020 s−1, while two-state kinetics limits the fixed-orbit annihilation rate to ΓA≲4.4×1014 s−1, about 1.7×105 below the IceCube upper limit for the bb̅ channel. A semi-analytic treatment indicates that re-excitation cycles further cool the captured population, although a full phase-space calculation is required for its final distribution. For neutron-philic 𝒪4 scattering at mχ=1 TeV and δ=300 keV, finite-temperature capture gives C⊙=3.98×1017 s−1, with nuclear-structure uncertainties giving an envelope (1.77-9.72)×1017 s−1. Under the equilibrium assumption, the upper edge remains about a factor $154$ below the IceCube upper limit for the bb̅ channel. We use bb̅ only as a soft-hadronic proxy because an exact constraint requires the model-specific annihilation spectrum. Solar capture therefore excludes the thermal-Higgsino interpretation but not endothermic explanations generically.

Related

  1. LZ nuclear recoil event from inelastic singlet-doublet scalar dark matter
    Disha Bandyopadhyay, Debasish Borah, Pankaj Borah
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull text29 citedCosmologyHigh-energy & particle physicsarXivOpenAlex
  2. Inelastic Dark Photon Dark Matter for the LUX-ZEPLIN High-Recoil Event and the Galactic Halo Gamma-Ray Excess
    Kimiko Yamashita
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full text67 citedHigh-energy astrophysicsHigh-energy & particle physicsarXivOpenAlex
  3. Implications of Inelastic Dark Matter for Primordial Dark-Star Evolution: Kinematic Thresholds and Nonthermal Capture
    Qinxun Li, Shengyi Liu
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textCosmologyGalaxiesarXiv
  4. Solar Neutrino Constraints on Inelastic Dark Matter Scattering in Light of Recent LUX-ZEPLIN Observations
    Thong T. Q. Nguyen, Tim Linden, Dan Hooper
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full text33 citedHigh-energy astrophysicsSolar & stellar physicsarXivOpenAlex
  5. Testing Higgs-Coupled Minimal Dark Matter with Solar Neutrinos after the LZ High-Recoil Event
    Mattia Di Mauro
    arXivPreprintCC0Full textHigh-energy astrophysicsHigh-energy & particle physicsarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{mauro2026solar,
  title = {{Solar Capture Tests of Inelastic Dark Matter after the LZ High-Recoil Event}},
  author = {Mattia Di Mauro and Halim Shaikh},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2609.06760},
  eprint = {2609.06760},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.06760},
  note = {CC0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Solar Capture Tests of Inelastic Dark Matter after the LZ High-Recoil Event
AU  - Mattia Di Mauro
AU  - Halim Shaikh
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/06
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2609.06760
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.06760
AB  - The LUX-ZEPLIN (LZ) Collaboration has reported a $248$ keV nuclear-recoil candidate for which endothermic dark matter (DM) gives some of the largest local significances. We study Solar-capture constraints on three interpretations: a thermal Higgsino, a thermal pseudo-Dirac fermion with off-diagonal vector interactions, and neutron-philic endothermic spin-dependent scattering through 𝒪_4. The canonical full-density thermal Higgsino is excluded: its LZ-preferred splitting near 0.38 MeV lies well below the splitting required to suppress Solar capture sufficiently to satisfy the IceCube upper limits on DM annihilation in the Sun, δ≳0.51-0.56 MeV. For the pseudo-Dirac benchmark parameters that fit the LZ event, we find C_⊙=1.53×10^20 s^−1, while two-state kinetics limits the fixed-orbit annihilation rate to Γ_A≲4.4×10^14 s^−1, about 1.7×10^5 below the IceCube upper limit for the bb̅ channel. A semi-analytic treatment indicates that re-excitation cycles further cool the captured population, although a full phase-space calculation is required for its final distribution. For neutron-philic 𝒪_4 scattering at m_χ=1 TeV and δ=300 keV, finite-temperature capture gives C_⊙=3.98×10^17 s^−1, with nuclear-structure uncertainties giving an envelope (1.77-9.72)×10^17 s^−1. Under the equilibrium assumption, the upper edge remains about a factor $154$ below the IceCube upper limit for the bb̅ channel. We use bb̅ only as a soft-hadronic proxy because an exact constraint requires the model-specific annihilation spectrum. Solar capture therefore excludes the thermal-Higgsino interpretation but not endothermic explanations generically.
SN  - 2331-8422
ER  -