Using Bayesian inference to characterize cell-size regulation across organisms
- 1Weizmann Institute of Science
Abstract
How organisms regulate cell size and whether this varies with growth conditions remains a fundamental question. Inferring how cells regulate their size requires separating biological control from statistical effects. Yet regulatory strategies are commonly classified by estimating the size-control parameter, , from single-cell measurements using linear regression. We show that this conventional estimator is systematically biased by measurement noise, lineage-to-lineage extrinsic variability, and finite lineage length. Consequently, the same underlying regulatory mechanism can be misclassified as sizer-, adder-, or timer-like. We develop a Bayesian framework that jointly infers and the amplitudes of intrinsic, extrinsic, and measurement noise while accounting for lineage heterogeneity and finite sampling. Across simulations spanning experimentally relevant noise levels and lineage lengths, the framework recovers and outperforms conventional regression, particularly for short and heterogeneous lineages. Reanalysis of diverse bacterial and eukaryotic datasets collected under multiple growth conditions indicates that statistical bias accounts for much of the reported variation in across organisms and growth conditions. After accounting for these biases, the datasets are broadly consistent with adder-like regulation. Thus, our results provide a general framework for distinguishing genuine biological differences from noise-induced changes in inferred regulatory strategy and revise how cell-size regulation should be inferred from lineage data.
Related
- Bayesian Gaussian process inference of RNA velocity as a probabilistic vector field on single-cell manifolds
- The brilliant future of non-traditional model organisms in biology
- The NLRP3 Inflammasome Across the AKI–AKD–CKD Continuum: Mitochondrial, Epigenetic and Endocrine–Metabolic Regulation
- KEGG Syntax for comparison of organisms, organism groups, and viruses by conserved gene repertoires
- A multimodal adaptive optical microscope for in vivo imaging from molecules to organisms
BibTeX
@misc{biswas2026using,
title = {{Using Bayesian inference to characterize cell-size regulation across organisms}},
author = {K. Biswas and M. Sheinman and A. Amir},
howpublished = {bioRxiv},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.64898/2026.10.14.759273},
url = {https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.10.14.759273v1},
note = {CC BY-NC-ND},
}
RIS
TY - UNPB
TI - Using Bayesian inference to characterize cell-size regulation across organisms
AU - K. Biswas
AU - M. Sheinman
AU - A. Amir
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/14
PB - bioRxiv
DO - 10.64898/2026.10.14.759273
UR - https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.10.14.759273v1
AB - How organisms regulate cell size and whether this varies with growth conditions remains a fundamental question. Inferring how cells regulate their size requires separating biological control from statistical effects. Yet regulatory strategies are commonly classified by estimating the size-control parameter, , from single-cell measurements using linear regression. We show that this conventional estimator is systematically biased by measurement noise, lineage-to-lineage extrinsic variability, and finite lineage length. Consequently, the same underlying regulatory mechanism can be misclassified as sizer-, adder-, or timer-like. We develop a Bayesian framework that jointly infers and the amplitudes of intrinsic, extrinsic, and measurement noise while accounting for lineage heterogeneity and finite sampling. Across simulations spanning experimentally relevant noise levels and lineage lengths, the framework recovers and outperforms conventional regression, particularly for short and heterogeneous lineages. Reanalysis of diverse bacterial and eukaryotic datasets collected under multiple growth conditions indicates that statistical bias accounts for much of the reported variation in across organisms and growth conditions. After accounting for these biases, the datasets are broadly consistent with adder-like regulation. Thus, our results provide a general framework for distinguishing genuine biological differences from noise-induced changes in inferred regulatory strategy and revise how cell-size regulation should be inferred from lineage data.
ER -