More than 83.9% of the zeros of the Riemann zeta function are distinct and more than 67.35% are simple and on the critical line
Abstract
Let N(T) count the nontrivial zeros of the Riemann zeta function up to height T with multiplicity, N_d(T) the distinct ones, and N_0^s(T) those that are simple and on the critical line. We prove liminf N_d(T)/N(T) >= 1645064/1960733 = 0.83900...; earlier work proves 0.83699..., and a report we have not verified claims 0.83805.... Hence more than 67.80% are simple. Also liminf N_0^s(T)/N(T) >= 0.67353...; earlier work proves 0.67250..., and reports we have not verified claim 0.673492. Two estimates of Lamzouri are improved: at least 88.93% of the zeros are simple or on the critical line, and the proportions of simple zeros and of zeros on the line average at least 83.67%. By the unconditional form of Montgomery's pair-correlation theorem the energy, a sum of a test function over pairs of zeros, is known asymptotically. A zero of multiplicity d contributes d^2 to it and nearby zeros contribute too, so a lower bound for such pairs leaves less energy for multiple zeros. The proof has three steps. First, for zeros at least a fixed fraction of the mean spacing apart, a large sieve inequality lets their pairs be used in full, with multiplicities. Second, their contribution is bounded below by a computer-assisted inequality for seven or eight consecutive zeros which distinguishes simple and double zeros. Its correction terms telescope, as increments of a storage function. Third, the test function is chosen to make this contribution large, at the cost of more energy. We also prove upper limits for what such inequalities can give with the two main test functions. The lower bounds and these limits are proved in Lean 4, analytic inputs included. The proofs use three axioms beyond those of Mathlib, one per inequality. Each records that a search program returned true; Lean's kernel does not check the run itself. This work is an experiment in AI-assisted mathematical research.
Related
- Simple critical zeros and distinct zeros of the Riemann zeta function in short intervals
- More than 8/9 zeros of the Riemann zeta function are simple or on the critical line
- A new proof that more than 2/3 of the zeros of the Riemann zeta function are simple and on the critical line
- More than 83.69% of the zeros of the Riemann zeta function are distinct
- One-level density of zeros of the Riemann zeta function weighted by its special values
BibTeX
@misc{knausgard2026more,
title = {{More than 83.9% of the zeros of the Riemann zeta function are distinct and more than 67.35% are simple and on the critical line}},
author = {Kristian Muri Knausgård},
howpublished = {arXiv},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2610.08965},
eprint = {2610.08965},
archivePrefix = {arXiv},
url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.08965},
}
RIS
TY - UNPB
TI - More than 83.9% of the zeros of the Riemann zeta function are distinct and more than 67.35% are simple and on the critical line
AU - Kristian Muri Knausgård
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/06
PB - arXiv
DO - 10.48550/arxiv.2610.08965
UR - https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.08965
AB - Let N(T) count the nontrivial zeros of the Riemann zeta function up to height T with multiplicity, N_d(T) the distinct ones, and N_0^s(T) those that are simple and on the critical line. We prove liminf N_d(T)/N(T) >= 1645064/1960733 = 0.83900...; earlier work proves 0.83699..., and a report we have not verified claims 0.83805.... Hence more than 67.80% are simple. Also liminf N_0^s(T)/N(T) >= 0.67353...; earlier work proves 0.67250..., and reports we have not verified claim 0.673492. Two estimates of Lamzouri are improved: at least 88.93% of the zeros are simple or on the critical line, and the proportions of simple zeros and of zeros on the line average at least 83.67%. By the unconditional form of Montgomery's pair-correlation theorem the energy, a sum of a test function over pairs of zeros, is known asymptotically. A zero of multiplicity d contributes d^2 to it and nearby zeros contribute too, so a lower bound for such pairs leaves less energy for multiple zeros. The proof has three steps. First, for zeros at least a fixed fraction of the mean spacing apart, a large sieve inequality lets their pairs be used in full, with multiplicities. Second, their contribution is bounded below by a computer-assisted inequality for seven or eight consecutive zeros which distinguishes simple and double zeros. Its correction terms telescope, as increments of a storage function. Third, the test function is chosen to make this contribution large, at the cost of more energy. We also prove upper limits for what such inequalities can give with the two main test functions. The lower bounds and these limits are proved in Lean 4, analytic inputs included. The proofs use three axioms beyond those of Mathlib, one per inequality. Each records that a search program returned true; Lean's kernel does not check the run itself. This work is an experiment in AI-assisted mathematical research.
ER -