Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 26 min ago
PreprintarXiv licencearXiv

Dynamic prediction intervals for survival times

Abstract

Most work on survival prediction focuses on estimating survival probabilities rather than predicting individual event times. Recent conformal methods have made it possible to construct prediction intervals for survival times with right-censored outcomes, but existing approaches are restricted to settings with covariates only measured at baseline and do not address dynamic prediction with longitudinal data. We study prediction intervals for survival times in a dynamic prediction framework with longitudinal covariates. Our approach uses Penalized Regression Calibration (PRC) as a working dynamic prediction model, combining linear mixed models for the longitudinal histories with a Cox model for post-landmark survival, and then applies a conformal calibration step to obtain prediction intervals. We compare naive intervals obtained by direct inversion of the survival function estimated by PRC to our dynamic conformal method. A Monte Carlo simulation study evaluates empirical coverage and interval length across sample sizes, censoring levels, landmark times, and non-proportional hazards (NPH) scenarios. We illustrate the proposed methodology by computing dynamic prediction intervals for the time until a dementia diagnosis in the ADNI dataset. The results show that naive inversion is often unreliable, whereas the proposed dynamic conformal method yields more stable predictive performance.

Related

  1. Proper scoring rules for survival times
    Philip Dawid
    arXivPreprintCC BY-NC-SA 4.0Full textStatisticsarXiv
  2. Mean-Tilted Intervals: Regression and Dynamic Models
    Antonio De Leon, Raquel Prado, Bruno Sansó
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textStatisticsarXiv
  3. CASCADE Conformal Prediction: Uncertainty-Adaptive Prediction Intervals for Two-Stage Clinical Decision Support
    Ricardo Diaz-Rincon, Muxuan Liang, Adolfo Ramirez-Zamora +1
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textStatisticsarXiv
  4. PICPIs: Prediction-Interval-Conditional Prediction Intervals
    Xuelin Yang, Baihe Huang, Yilong Hou +2
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textStatisticsarXiv
  5. Frequentist prediction intervals for random-effects meta-analysis via confidence-distribution propagation
    Hisashi Noma, Guido Schwarzer
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textStatisticsarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{carvisiglia2026dynamic,
  title = {{Dynamic prediction intervals for survival times}},
  author = {Lorenzo Carvisiglia and Saverio Ranciati and Mirko Signorelli},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2609.10409},
  eprint = {2609.10409},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.10409},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Dynamic prediction intervals for survival times
AU  - Lorenzo Carvisiglia
AU  - Saverio Ranciati
AU  - Mirko Signorelli
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/09
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2609.10409
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.10409
AB  - Most work on survival prediction focuses on estimating survival probabilities rather than predicting individual event times. Recent conformal methods have made it possible to construct prediction intervals for survival times with right-censored outcomes, but existing approaches are restricted to settings with covariates only measured at baseline and do not address dynamic prediction with longitudinal data. We study prediction intervals for survival times in a dynamic prediction framework with longitudinal covariates. Our approach uses Penalized Regression Calibration (PRC) as a working dynamic prediction model, combining linear mixed models for the longitudinal histories with a Cox model for post-landmark survival, and then applies a conformal calibration step to obtain prediction intervals. We compare naive intervals obtained by direct inversion of the survival function estimated by PRC to our dynamic conformal method. A Monte Carlo simulation study evaluates empirical coverage and interval length across sample sizes, censoring levels, landmark times, and non-proportional hazards (NPH) scenarios. We illustrate the proposed methodology by computing dynamic prediction intervals for the time until a dementia diagnosis in the ADNI dataset. The results show that naive inversion is often unreliable, whereas the proposed dynamic conformal method yields more stable predictive performance.
ER  -